Literature DB >> 29853273

A reply to Sahle and Braun's reply to 'The pattern of emergence of a Middle Stone Age tradition at Gademotta and Kulkuletti (Ethiopia) through convergent tool and point technologies' [J. Hum. Evol. 91 (2016) 93-121].

Katja Douze1, Anne Delagnes2, Veerle Rots3, Brad Gravina4.   

Abstract

Sahle and Braun's (in press) recent comments on our identification (Douze and Delagnes, 2016) of diachronic trends in Middle Stone Age point traditions in several lithic assemblages from the sites of Gademotta and Kulkuletti (Ethiopia) focuses on pointed tool function rather than the gradual technological shifts we observed between sites. Here we address several of what we consider to be inaccuracies and misinterpretations concerning our work with the Gademotta and Kulkuletti lithic assemblages (Douze, 2012, 2014), more specifically, Sahle and Braun's (in press) interpretation of the tranchet blow technique. This discussion is inseparable from a critical review of the evidence advanced by Sahle and Braun to support projectile technology being present in the Gademotta Formation as early as >279 ka.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gademotta and Kulkuletti; Middle Stone Age; Obsidian; Points; Projectile technology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29853273     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  1 in total

1.  Why did hunting weapon design change at Abri Pataud? Lithic use-wear data on armature use and hafting around 24,000-22,000 BP.

Authors:  Noora Taipale; Laurent Chiotti; Veerle Rots
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.