Literature DB >> 29852899

Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device.

Wilfred R Pigeon1,2, Maddison Taylor1, Ashley Bui1, Courteney Oleynk1, Patrick Walsh1, Todd M Bishop1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To test the sleep-wake scoring reliability of a new wrist-worn sleep monitoring device.
METHODS: Twenty-seven adult good sleepers underwent 1 night of polysomnography (PSG) while wearing both the new device (myCadian [MC]; CurAegis Technologies, Rochester, New York, United States) and commercially available actigraphy (Actiwatch 2 [AW]; Philips Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, United States) on their nondominant wrist. PSG tests were manually stage scored. After excluding missing data, 20 participants had full-night data on all three devices with 17,734 total 30-second epochs. Using PSG as the gold standard, pooled epoch-by-epoch agreement for sleep and wake was calculated for each device using percent agreement and Cohen kappa statistic. Positive predictive values for both sleep and wake epochs, as well as sleep continuity statistics, were calculated.
RESULTS: Percent agreement with PSG-scored wake and sleep was 91.3% for MC (kappa = 0.67) and 87.7% for AW (kappa = 0.50). Positive predictive values for sleep epochs were 94.4% and 90.8% for MC and AW, respectively, and 74.5% and 65.6% for wake. Both devices underestimated wake and overestimated sleep compared to PSG. Descriptively, compared to PSG, sleep latency was higher with MC and wake after sleep onset higher with AW. Total sleep time and sleep efficiency were more similar across devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The kappa statistic for MC is consistent with a high level of agreement with PSG. Overall, the reliability of MC compared to PSG scoring was slightly more favorable than that of AW. Findings suggest that MC provides reliable sleep-wake scoring during a nocturnal sleep period for good sleepers.
© 2018 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; polysomnography; reliability; sleep-wake scoring; validation; wearable device

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29852899      PMCID: PMC5991960          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  20 in total

1.  Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research.

Authors:  C H. Bastien; A Vallières; C M. Morin
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  A pilot study of inexpensive sleep-assessment devices.

Authors:  Jack D Edinger; Melanie K Means; Karen M Stechuchak; Maren K Olsen
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.964

3.  Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time.

Authors:  D J Mullaney; D F Kripke; S Messin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  The first night effect: an EEG study of sleep.

Authors:  H W Agnew; W B Webb; R L Williams
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Laura S Hiruma; Kristin Avis; Hawley Montgomery-Downs; Judith Valentin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device.

Authors:  Hawley E Montgomery-Downs; Salvatore P Insana; Jonathan A Bond
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 7.  The role of actigraphy in sleep medicine.

Authors:  Avi Sadeh; Christine Acebo
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.609

8.  A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale.

Authors:  M W Johns
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  Practice parameters for the use of actigraphy in the assessment of sleep and sleep disorders: an update for 2007.

Authors:  Timothy Morgenthaler; Cathy Alessi; Leah Friedman; Judith Owens; Vishesh Kapur; Brian Boehlecke; Terry Brown; Andrew Chesson; Jack Coleman; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Jeffrey Pancer; Todd J Swick
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 10.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Michelle M Goto; Robert D Furberg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  5 in total

1.  Agreement between actigraphic and polysomnographic measures of sleep in adults with and without chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Conley; Andrea Knies; Janene Batten; Garrett Ash; Brienne Miner; Youri Hwang; Sangchoon Jeon; Nancy S Redeker
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 11.609

2.  Sleep Measurement Using Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Data Compared with Polysomnography.

Authors:  John D Chase; Michael A Busa; John W Staudenmayer; John R Sirard
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Measurement Methods of Fatigue, Sleepiness, and Sleep Behaviour Aboard Ships: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fiona Kerkamm; Dorothee Dengler; Matthias Eichler; Danuta Materzok-Köppen; Lukas Belz; Felix Alexander Neumann; Birgit Christiane Zyriax; Volker Harth; Marcus Oldenburg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Creating an algorithm to identify indices of sleep quantity and quality from a wearable armband in adults.

Authors:  Laura Grau; Jaron Arbet; Danielle M Ostendorf; Jennifer M Blankenship; Shelby L Panter; Victoria A Catenacci; Edward L Melanson; Seth A Creasy
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep

5.  Sleep in Myopic and Non-Myopic Children.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Scott A Read; Stephen J Vincent; Michael J Collins
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.