| Literature DB >> 29852439 |
Jian Sun1, Zhenxing Shen2, Yaling Zeng3, Xinyi Niu3, Jinhui Wang4, Junji Cao5, Xuesong Gong3, Hongmei Xu3, Taobo Wang3, Hongxia Liu3, Liu Yang3.
Abstract
The emission factors (EFs) of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM2.5 were measured from commonly used stoves and fuels in the rural Guanzhong Plain, China. The toxicity of the PM2.5 also was measured using in vitro cellular tests. EFs of PAHs varied from 0.18 mg kg-1 (maize straw charcoal burning in a clean stove) to 83.3 mg kg-1 (maize straw burning in Heated Kang). The two largest influencing factors on PAH EFs were air supply and volatile matter proportion in fuel. Improvements in these two factors could decrease not only EFs of PAHs but also the proportion of 3-ring to 5-ring PAHs. Exposure to PM2.5 extracts caused a concentration-dependent decline in cell viability but an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). PM2.5 emitted from maize burning in Heated Kang showed the highest cytotoxicity, and EFs of ROS and inflammatory factors were the highest as well. In comparison, maize straw charcoal burning in a clean stove showed the lowest cytotoxicity, which indicated a clean stove and fuel treatment were both efficient methods for reducing cytotoxicity of primary PM2.5. The production of these bioreactive factors were highly correlated with 3-ring and 4-ring PAHs. Specifically, pyrene, anthracene and benzo(a)anthracene had the highest correlations with ROS production (R = 0.85, 0.81 and 0.80, respectively). This study shows that all tested stoves emitted PM2.5 that was cytotoxic to human cells; thus, there may be no safe levels of exposure to PM2.5 emissions from cooking and heating stoves using solid fuels. The study may also provide a new approach for evaluating the cytotoxicity of primary emitted PM2.5 from solid fuel burning as well as other PM2.5 sources.Entities:
Keywords: Cytotoxicity; Emission factors; Inflammatory cytokine; PAHs; ROS; Solid fuel burning
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29852439 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Pollut ISSN: 0269-7491 Impact factor: 8.071