Literature DB >> 29852380

Comparison of two digestion strategies on characteristics and differentiation potential of human dental pulp stem cells.

Maziar Ebrahimi Dastgurdi1, Fatemeh Ejeian2, Marzie Nematollahi2, Ahmad Motaghi3, Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the behavior of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) after isolation using solutions containing either collagenase/dispase or collagenase alone.
DESIGN: DPSCs were isolated by two digestion methods (collagenase/dispase or collagenase alone) from human third molars. Immunophenotypic features were confirmed by flow cytometry for cell markers STRO-1, cluster of differentiation (CD) 146, CD45, and collagen type-I. The proliferation potential of cells was evaluated by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (brdU) incorporation assay, and finally they were assessed for multi-lineage differentiation potential. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and independent t-tests.
RESULTS: DPSCs isolated by either method showed similar levels of STRO-1, CD45, and collagen type-I and similar incorporation of brdU (P > 0.05). However, DPSCs obtained by collagenase I/dispase treatment had significantly higher numbers of CD146+ cells and osteogenic and chondrogenic capacities compared to those obtained by treatment with collagenase I alone (P < 0.05). On the other hand, more STRO-1+/CD164-DPSCs were found in the collagenase alone group with higher adipogenic potential.
CONCLUSIONS: Different enzyme solutions gave rise to different populations of DPSCs. Dispase enhanced isolation of CD146+ DPSCs probably by disrupting the basement membranes of blood vessels and releasing DPCSs embedded in the perivascular niche. Furthermore, the differentiation potential of DPSCs was influenced by the change in enzyme solution.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CD 146; Dental pulp cell; Isolation method; Mesenchymal stem cell

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29852380     DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Oral Biol        ISSN: 0003-9969            Impact factor:   2.633


  5 in total

1.  Best Practices for Preparing a Single Cell Suspension from Solid Tissues for Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Andrew Reichard; Kewal Asosingh
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 2.  Regenerative Capacity of Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Adlin S Rosaian; Gururaj Narayana Rao; Sunil P Mohan; Mahalakshmi Vijayarajan; Rebekkah C Prabhakaran; Anand Sherwood
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2020-08-28

Review 3.  Recycle the dental fairy's package: overview of dental pulp stem cells.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Li Li; Li Xiao; Donghui Zhang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 6.832

4.  ZIF-8 Modified Polypropylene Membrane: A Biomimetic Cell Culture Platform with a View to the Improvement of Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ejeian; Amir Razmjou; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani; Munirah Mohammad; Fereshteh Karamali; Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani; Mohsen Asadnia; Vicki Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-12-09

5.  In Vitro Study of the Recruitment and Expansion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells at the Interface of a Cu-Doped PCL-Bioglass Scaffold.

Authors:  Behnaz Malekahmadi; Vahid Esfahanian; Fatemeh Ejeian; Maziar Ebrahimi Dastgurdi; Maria Agheb; Faranak Kaveian; Mohammad Rafienia; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.