OBJECTIVE: The growing interest to integrate consumer smart wristbands in eHealth applications spawns the need for novel approaches of data parametrization which account for the technology-specific constraints. The present study aims to investigate the feasibility of a consumer smart wristband to be used for computing pulse rate parameters during free-living activities. APPROACH: The feasibility of computing pulse rate variability (PRV) as well as pulse rate and physical activity-related parameters using the smart wristband was investigated, having an electrocardiogram as a reference. The parameters were studied on the pulse rate and step data from 54 participants, diagnosed with various cardiovascular diseases. The data were acquired during free-living activities with no user lifestyle intervention. MAIN RESULTS: The comparison results show that the smart wristband is well-suited for computing the mean interbeat interval and the standard deviation of the averaged interbeat intervals. However, it is less reliable when estimating frequency domain and nonlinear parameters. Heart recovery time, estimated by fitting an exponential model to the events, satisfying the conditions of the 3 min step test, showed satisfactory agreement (relative error <20%) with the reference ECG in one-third of all cases. On the other hand, the heart's adaptation to physical workload, expressed as the slope of the linear regression curve, was underestimated in most cases. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study demonstrates that pulse rate parametrization using a consumer smart wristband is in principle feasible. The results show that the smart wristband is well suited for computing basic PRV parameters which have been reported to be associated with poorer health outcomes. In addition, the study introduces a methodology for the estimation of post-exercise heart recovery time and the heart's adaptation to physical workload during free-living activities.
OBJECTIVE: The growing interest to integrate consumer smart wristbands in eHealth applications spawns the need for novel approaches of data parametrization which account for the technology-specific constraints. The present study aims to investigate the feasibility of a consumer smart wristband to be used for computing pulse rate parameters during free-living activities. APPROACH: The feasibility of computing pulse rate variability (PRV) as well as pulse rate and physical activity-related parameters using the smart wristband was investigated, having an electrocardiogram as a reference. The parameters were studied on the pulse rate and step data from 54 participants, diagnosed with various cardiovascular diseases. The data were acquired during free-living activities with no user lifestyle intervention. MAIN RESULTS: The comparison results show that the smart wristband is well-suited for computing the mean interbeat interval and the standard deviation of the averaged interbeat intervals. However, it is less reliable when estimating frequency domain and nonlinear parameters. Heart recovery time, estimated by fitting an exponential model to the events, satisfying the conditions of the 3 min step test, showed satisfactory agreement (relative error <20%) with the reference ECG in one-third of all cases. On the other hand, the heart's adaptation to physical workload, expressed as the slope of the linear regression curve, was underestimated in most cases. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study demonstrates that pulse rate parametrization using a consumer smart wristband is in principle feasible. The results show that the smart wristband is well suited for computing basic PRV parameters which have been reported to be associated with poorer health outcomes. In addition, the study introduces a methodology for the estimation of post-exercise heart recovery time and the heart's adaptation to physical workload during free-living activities.
Authors: Peter H Charlton; Panicos A Kyriaco; Jonathan Mant; Vaidotas Marozas; Phil Chowienczyk; Jordi Alastruey Journal: Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 10.961