| Literature DB >> 29851331 |
Devin O'Kelly1, Heling Zhou1, Ralph P Mason1.
Abstract
Physiological monitoring is a critical aspect of in vivo experimentation, particularly imaging studies. Physiological monitoring facilitates gated acquisition of imaging data and more robust experimental interpretation but has historically required additional instrumentation that may be cumbersome. As frame rates have increased, imaging methods have been able to capture ever more rapid dynamics, passing the Nyquist sampling rate of most physiological processes and allowing the capture of motion, such as breathing. With this transition, image artifacts have also changed their nature; rather than intraframe motion causing blurring and deteriorating resolution, interframe motion does not affect individual frames and may be recovered as useful information from an image time series. We demonstrate a method that takes advantage of interframe movement for detection of gross physiological motion in real-time image sequences. We further demonstrate the ability of the method, dubbed tomographic breathing detection to quantify the dynamics of respiration, allowing the capture of respiratory information pertinent to anesthetic depth monitoring. Our example uses multispectral optoacoustic tomography, but it will be widely relevant to other technologies. (2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).Entities:
Keywords: breathing detection; motion detection; multispectral optoacoustic tomography; photoacoustics; respiratory motion
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29851331 PMCID: PMC5974565 DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.5.056011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Opt ISSN: 1083-3668 Impact factor: 3.170
Fig. 1Cartoon overview of the method: (a) an image series (e.g., Video 1, MP4, 129 kB [URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.5.056011.1]) is bandpass filtered and (b) the MSE between each sequential image is calculated. This error may then be used to infer the presence of motion between a given pair of frames.
Fig. 2(a, upper) Experimental protocol for isoflurane challenge. A mouse was induced while breathing 1.5% isoflurane in air at for 20 min and then underwent the isoflurane and oxygen challenge experiment. The animal breathed air for the first 20 min, at which point the breathing gas was switched to oxygen. (a, lower) Breathing rate determined from the isoflurane challenge experiment with both the MSE method and the manually annotated data. (b) Bland–Altman plot showing the variation in detected breathing rate between the MSE and manual breathing traces. The differences between the methods have a mean of . (c–f) Time courses of MSE and recovered breathing rate under (c) 2.0%, (d, e) 2.5%, and (f) 1.5% isoflurane exposure, while breathing (c, d) air and (e, f) oxygen. In (d), we see the capture of a breathing transient in compensation for suspended breathing, whereas (f) shows the increased breathing rate due to switching back to 1.5% isoflurane. Note the change of scale in (e, f).
Fig. 3Comparison of averaged images (a) without () and (b) with () removal of image frames exceeding the first quartile of the MSE distribution. Improved resolution due to decreased blurring may clearly be seen, particularly in regions with rich vascular structure (insets). The images are pooled from the 800-nm channel of the first 300 image frames of Video 1.