Literature DB >> 29851082

Compositional and structural dynamics of the ruminal microbiota in dairy heifers and its relationship to methane production.

Camila S Cunha1, Marcos I Marcondes1, Cristina M Veloso1, Hilário C Mantovani2, Luiz Gustavo R Pereira3, Thierry R Tomich3, Kimberly A Dill-McFarland4, Garret Suen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heifers emit more enteric methane (CH4 ) than adult cows and these emissions tend to decrease per unit feed intake as they age. However, common mitigation strategies like expensive high-quality feeds are not economically feasible for these pre-production animals. Given its direct role in CH4 production, altering the rumen microbiota is another potential avenue for reducing CH4 production by ruminants. However, to identify effective microbial targets, a better understanding of the rumen microbiota and its relationship to CH4 production across heifer development is needed.
RESULTS: Here, we investigate the relationship between rumen bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities as well as CH4 emissions and a number of production traits in prepubertal (PP), pubertal (PB), and pregnant heifers (PG). Overall, PG heifers emitted the most CH4 , followed by PB and PP heifers. The bacterial genus Acetobacter and the archaeal genus Methanobrevibacter were positively associated, while Eubacterium and Methanosphaera were negatively associated with raw CH4 production by heifers. When corrected for dietary intake, both Eubacterium and Methanosphaera remained negatively associated with CH4 production.
CONCLUSION: We suggest that Eubacterium and Methanosphaera represent likely targets for CH4 mitigation efforts in heifers as they were negatively associated with CH4 production and not significantly associated with production traits.
© 2018 Society of Chemical Industry. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; greenhouse gases; methane; microbiota; next generation sequencing; rumen microbiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29851082     DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Food Agric        ISSN: 0022-5142            Impact factor:   3.638


  6 in total

1.  Methane Reduction Potential of Brown Seaweeds and Their Influence on Nutrient Degradation and Microbiota Composition in a Rumen Simulation Technique.

Authors:  Susanne Künzel; Timur Yergaliyev; Katharina J Wild; Hanna Philippi; Asta H Petursdottir; Helga Gunnlaugsdottir; Chris K Reynolds; David J Humphries; Amélia Camarinha-Silva; Markus Rodehutscord
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Metagenomic and Metabolomic Insights Into the Mechanism Underlying the Disparity in Milk Yield of Holstein Cows.

Authors:  Abdulmumini B Amin; Lei Zhang; JiYou Zhang; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.064

3.  Effects of Dietary Forage Proportion on Feed Intake, Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein Heifers at Various Growth Stages.

Authors:  Lifeng Dong; Binchang Li; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Role of Secondary Plant Metabolites on Enteric Methane Mitigation in Ruminants.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ku-Vera; Rafael Jiménez-Ocampo; Sara Stephanie Valencia-Salazar; María Denisse Montoya-Flores; Isabel Cristina Molina-Botero; Jacobo Arango; Carlos Alfredo Gómez-Bravo; Carlos Fernando Aguilar-Pérez; Francisco Javier Solorio-Sánchez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-08-27

5.  Ceftiofur formulation differentially affects the intestinal drug concentration, resistance of fecal Escherichia coli, and the microbiome of steers.

Authors:  Derek M Foster; Megan E Jacob; Kyle A Farmer; Benjamin J Callahan; Casey M Theriot; Sophia Kathariou; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Timo Prange; Mark G Papich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characterization of dairy cow rumen bacterial and archaeal communities associated with grass silage and maize silage based diets.

Authors:  Jueeli D Vaidya; Sanne van Gastelen; Hauke Smidt; Caroline M Plugge; Joan E Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.