Literature DB >> 29850866

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF in Treatment-Seeking Veterans with History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

S M Jurick1,2, L D Crocker3,4, A V Keller3, S N Hoffman3, J Bomyea3, M W Jacobson3,5, A J Jak3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-Second Edition-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) to better understand symptom presentation in a sample of treatment-seeking Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans with self-reported history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
METHOD: Participants underwent a comprehensive clinical neuropsychological battery including performance and symptom validity measures and self-report measures of depressive, posttraumatic, and post-concussive symptomatology. Those with possible symptom exaggeration (SE+) on the MMPI-2-RF were compared with those without (SE-) with regard to injury, psychiatric, validity, and cognitive variables.
RESULTS: Between 50% and 87% of participants demonstrated possible symptom exaggeration on one or more MMPI-2-RF validity scales, and a large majority were elevated on content scales related to cognitive, somatic, and emotional complaints. The SE+ group reported higher depressive, posttraumatic, and post-concussive symptomatology, had higher scores on symptom validity measures, and performed more poorly on neuropsychological measures compared with the SE- group. There were no group differences with regard to injury variables or performance validity measures. Participants were more likely to exhibit possible symptom exaggeration on cognitive/somatic compared with traditional psychopathological validity scales.
CONCLUSIONS: A sizable portion of treatment-seeking OEF/OIF Veterans demonstrated possible symptom exaggeration on MMPI-2-RF validity scales, which was associated with elevated scores on self-report measures and poorer cognitive performance, but not higher rates of performance validity failure, suggesting symptom and performance validity are distinct concepts. These findings have implications for the interpretation of clinical data in the context of possible symptom exaggeration and treatment in Veterans with persistent post-concussive symptoms. Published by Oxford University Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Depression; Head injury; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Symptom validity testing; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850866     DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acy048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0887-6177            Impact factor:   2.813


  4 in total

1.  Does Validity Measure Response Affect CPT Group Outcomes in Veterans with PTSD?

Authors:  M Wright Williams; David Graham; Nicole A Sciarrino; Matt Estey; Katherine L McCurry; Pearl Chiu; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Resilience facilitates adjustment through greater psychological flexibility among Iraq/Afghanistan war veterans with and without mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Timothy R Elliott; Yu-Yu Hsiao; Nathan A Kimbrel; Bryann B DeBeer; Suzy Bird Gulliver; Oi-Man Kwok; Sandra B Morissette; Eric C Meyer
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2019-06-27

3.  Performance validity and symptom validity tests: Are they measuring different constructs?

Authors:  Anna S Ord; Robert D Shura; Ashley R Sansone; Sarah L Martindale; Katherine H Taber; Jared A Rowland
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  White Matter Hyperintensities Are Not Related to Symptomatology or Cognitive Functioning in Service Members with a Remote History of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Sara M Lippa; Kimbra Kenney; Gerard Riedy; John Ollinger
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-06-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.