Literature DB >> 29850771

Quality Control Practices for Chemistry and Immunochemistry in a Cohort of 21 Large Academic Medical Centers.

Matthew W Rosenbaum1, James G Flood1, Stacy E F Melanson2, Nikola A Baumann3, Mark A Marzinke4, Alex J Rai5, Joshua Hayden6, Alan H B Wu7, Megan Ladror8, Mark S Lifshitz9, Mitchell G Scott10, Octavia M Peck-Palmer11, Raffick Bowen12, Nikolina Babic13, Kimia Sobhani14, Donald Giacherio15, Gregary T Bocsi16, Daniel S Herman17, Ping Wang17, John Toffaletti18, Elizabeth Handel18, Kathleen A Kelly19, Sami Albeiroti19, Sihe Wang20, Melissa Zimmer20, Brandon Driver21, Xin Yi21, Clayton Wilburn21, Kent B Lewandrowski1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, minimum standards for quality control (QC) are specified in federal law under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment and its revisions. Beyond meeting this required standard, laboratories have flexibility to determine their overall QC program.
METHODS: We surveyed chemistry and immunochemistry QC procedures at 21 clinical laboratories within leading academic medical centers to assess if standardized QC practices exist for chemistry and immunochemistry testing.
RESULTS: We observed significant variation and unexpected similarities in practice across laboratories, including QC frequency, cutoffs, number of levels analyzed, and other features.
CONCLUSIONS: This variation in practice indicates an opportunity exists to establish an evidence-based approach to QC that can be generalized across institutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850771     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  3 in total

1.  Integrating moving average control procedures into the risk-based quality control plan in small-volume medical laboratories.

Authors:  Vera Lukić; Svetlana Ignjatović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.515

2.  Improving quality control for in-clinic hematology analyzers: Common myths and opportunities.

Authors:  Helen T Michael; Mary B Nabity; C Guillermo Couto; Andreas Moritz; John W Harvey; Dennis B DeNicola; Jeremy M Hammond
Journal:  Vet Clin Pathol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.333

3.  Moving average procedures as an additional tool for real-time analytical quality control: challenges and opportunities of implementation in small-volume medical laboratories.

Authors:  Vera Lukić; Svetlana Ignjatović
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.