Literature DB >> 29850091

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and anti-oxidant capacity of 2,2'-{(1E,1'E)-[1,2-phenyl-enebis(aza-nylyl-idene)]bis-(methanylyl-idene)}bis-(5-benz-yloxy)phenol.

Nadir Ghichi1, Ali Benboudiaf1, Yacine DJebli2, Chawki Bensouici3, Hocine Merazig1.   

Abstract

The whole mol-ecule of the title Schiff base compound, C34H28N2O4, is generated by mirror symmetry, with the mirror bis-ecting the central benzene ring. It was synthesized via the condensation reaction of 1,2-di-amine-benzene with 4-benz-yloxy-2-hy-droxy-benzaldehyde. The mol-ecule is V-shaped and there are two intra-molecular O-H⋯N hydrogen bonds present forming S(6) ring motifs. The configuration about the C=N imine bonds is E. The central benzene ring makes dihedral angles of 41.9 (2) and 43.6 (2)° with the phenol ring and the outer benz-yloxy ring, respectively. The latter two rings are inclined to each other by 84.4 (2)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked by C-H⋯π inter-actions, forming layers lying parallel to the ab plane. The Hirshfeld surface analysis and the two-dimensional fingerprint plots confirm the predominance of these inter-actions in the crystal structure. The anti-oxidant capacity of the compound was determined by the cupric reducing anti-oxidant capacity (CUPRAC) process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CUPRAC; C—H⋯π inter­actions; Hirshfeld surface analysis; Schiff base; anti­oxidant capacity; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850091      PMCID: PMC5947487          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018005832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Schiff base derivatives are a biologically versatile class of compounds possessing diverse activities, such as anti-oxidant (Haribabu et al., 2015 ▸, 2016 ▸), anti-inflammatory (Alam et al., 2012 ▸), anti­anxiety, anti­depressant (Jubie et al., 2011 ▸), anti-tumour, anti­bacterial, and fungicidal properties (Refat et al., 2008 ▸; Kannan & Ramesh, 2006 ▸). Bis-bidentate Schiff base ligands have been studied extensively and used as building blocks in metallo-supra­molecular chemistry (Birkedal & Pattison, 2006 ▸; Shahverdizadeh & Tiekink, 2011 ▸; Chu & Huang, 2007 ▸; Yoshida & Ichikawa, 1997 ▸; Kruger et al., 2001 ▸). The common structural feature of these compounds is the presence of an azomethine group, linked by a η methyl­ene bridge, which can act as a hydrogen-bond acceptor. In view of this inter­est we have synthesized the title compound, (I), and report herein on its crystal structure. The 1H NMR NMR spectrum reveals the presence of an imino group (N=CH) in the range δ = 8.5–8.7 p.p.m. The anti­oxidant capacity of the compound was determined by the cupric reducing anti­oxidant capacity (CUPRAC) process.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of compound (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1 ▸. The asymmetric unit consists of half a mol­ecule, with the whole mol­ecule being generated by mirror symmetry. The mirror bis­ects the central benzene ring, viz. bonds C1—C1i and C3—C3i [symmetry code: (i) −x, y, z]. In the mol­ecule there are two intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds present (Table 1 ▸), which form S(6) ring motifs as shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The configuration of the C4=N1 imine bonds is E and the C4=N1 bond length is 1.278 (6) Å. The C3—N1=C4 bond angles are less than 120° [118.9 (4)°], and the imine group has a C3—N1—C4—C5 torsion angle of −176.8 (4)°. The mol­ecule is V-shaped and the two arms are non-planar; the central benzene ring forms dihedral angles of 41.9 (2) and 43.6 (2)° with the phenol ring (C5-C10) and the outer benz­yloxy ring (C12–C17), respectively. The latter two rings are almost normal to each other, with a dihedral angle of 84.4 (2)°.
Figure 1

View of the mol­ecular structure of compound (I), with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Unlabelled atoms are related to labelled atoms by the mirror symmetry code: (i) −x, y, z. The intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (see Table 1 ▸) are shown as dashed lines.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg2 is the centroid of the C5–C10 phenol ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1O⋯N10.821.902.622 (5)147
C2—H2⋯Cg2i 0.932.883.499 (5)125
C13—H13⋯Cg2ii 0.932.603.493 (5)161

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features and Hirshfeld surface analysis

In the crystal of (I), mol­ecules are linked by C—H⋯π inter­actions (Table 1 ▸), forming layers parallel to the (001) plane, as illustrated in Fig. 2 ▸.
Figure 2

Crystal packing of compound (I) viewed along the c axis, with the O—H⋯N intra­molecular hydrogen bonds and the C—H⋯π inter­actions (see Table 1 ▸) illustrated as dashed lines.

The Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) and the associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) were performed with CrystalExplorer17 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸). The Hirshfeld surface of compound (I) mapped over d norm is given in Fig. 3 ▸, and the fingerprint plots are given in Fig. 4 ▸. They reveal that the principal inter­molecular inter­actions are H⋯H at 45.7% (Fig. 4 ▸ b) and H⋯C/C⋯H at 34.6% (Fig. 4 ▸ c), followed by the H⋯O/O⋯H inter­actions at 13.6% (Fig. 4 ▸ d).
Figure 3

View of the Hirshfeld surface of (I) mapped over d norm.

Figure 4

The two-dimensional fingerprint plots of (I): (a) all inter­actions; (b) H⋯H; (c) H⋯C/C⋯H; (d) H⋯O/O⋯H.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39, last update February 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for similar compounds yielded four hits. These compounds (see Fig. 5 ▸) include 5,5′-dihy­droxy-2,2′-[o-phenyl­enebis(nitrilo­methyl­ene)]diphenol ethanol solvate (II) (CSD refcode HUVXUT; Soroceanu et al., 2013 ▸), 5,5′-dimeth­oxy-2,2′-[4,5-dimethyl-o-phenyl­enebis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenol (III) (KUSJIS; Kargar et al., 2010 ▸), 1,2-bis­{[(2-hy­droxy-4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)(phen­yl)methyl­ene]amino}­benzene (IV) (SOXCIS; Lippe et al., 2009 ▸) and 5,5′-dimeth­oxy-2,2′-1,2-phenyl­enebis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenol (V) (XIFREK; Eltayeb et al., 2007 ▸). In all four compounds there are two intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds present forming S(6) ring motifs.
Figure 5

Similar compounds to that of the title compound, (I), in the CSD; see Section 4, Database survey.

In (II) the phenol rings are inclined to the central benzene ring by 53.9 (3) and 4.0 (2)° and to each other by 49.9 (2)°. In (III) the corresponding dihedral angles are 48.12 (8), 21.44 (8) and 47.70 (8)°, while in (V) the corresponding dihedral angles are 58.29 (12), 2.20 (12) and 57.60 (12)°. In compound (IV), that possesses twofold rotational symmetry with the twofold axis bis­ecting the central benzene ring, the phenol rings are inclined to the central benzene ring by 82.30 (5)° and to each other by 63.76 (5)°. In the title compound, which possesses mirror symmetry, the corresponding dihedral angles are 41.9 (2) and 68.9 (2)°. A search of the CSD for metal complexes of compounds similar to compound (I) gave over 30 hits. The ligands always coordinate in a tetra­dentate manner. For example, there were 13 hits for transition metal complexes of compound (II). The majority involve square-planar coordinated metal atoms, such as in complexes (5,5′-dihy­droxy-2,2′-[o-phenyl­enebis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato)nickel(II) dihydrate (POFFOG; Fun et al., 2008 ▸) and (4,4′-{1,2-phenyl­enebis[(nitrilo-κN)methylyl­idene]}di­benzene-1,3-diolato-κO 3)copper(II) methanol solvate (DUQBEX; Niu et al., 2010 ▸). For compound (V), five hits were found; they include three sixfold-coord­inated tin complexes (DOSCOF, DOSDAS, DOSFOI; Muñoz-Flores et al., 2014 ▸) and two square-pyramidal manganese complexes (ODESEY, Ghaemi et al., 2016 ▸; XIYQOM, Eltayeb et al., 2008 ▸).

Anti­oxidant activity

The anti­oxidant activity profile of the synthesized compound (I) was determined by utilizing the copper(II)–neocuprine [CuII-Nc] (CUPRAC) method (Apak et al., 2004 ▸). The CUPRAC method (Fig. 6 ▸) (cupric ion reducing anti­oxidant capacity) is based on the follow-up of the decrease in the increased absorbance of the neocuproene (Nc), copper (Cu+2)Nc2–Cu+2 complex. Indeed, in the presence of an anti­oxidant agent, the copperneocuproene complex is reduced and this reaction is qu­anti­fied spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Figure 6

Reduction of the chromogenic complex of Cu+2–Nc

According to the cupric ion reducing anti­oxidant capacity assay, the title compound displayed activity with variable potency in all tested concentrations, because the percentage (%) inhibition in the CUPRAC assay is good [A0.50 = 15.03 ± 1.50 for a 4 mg dosage, compared to the results for buthylated toluene (BHT) [A0.50 = 8.97 ± 3.94], used as a positive control (see Table 2 ▸). Note: In CUPRAC anti­oxidant activity, the values expressed are the mean ± s.u.s of three parallel measurements (p < 0.05).
Table 2

Cupric ion reducing anti­oxidant capacity of compound (I)

 Percentage (%) Inhibition
 12.5 µg25 µg50 µg100 µg200 µg400 µg800 µgA0.50 (μg ml−1)
Compound (I)0.39±0.010.59±0.010.91±0.031.42±0.021.84±0.363.12±0.254.29±0.1115.03±1.50
BHT1.41±0.032.22±0.052.42±0.022.50±0.012.56±0.052.86±0.073.38±0.138.97±3.94

Synthesis and crystallization

1,2-Di­amine­benzene (0.027 g) and 4-benz­yloxy-2-hy­droxy­benzaldehyde (0.1141 g) in ethanol (15 ml) were refluxed for 1 h, then the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was recrystallized from ethanol, yielding yellow block-like crystals of the title compound on slow evaporation of the solvent. The purity of the compound was characterized by its NMR spectrum (250 MHz, CDCl3). The azomethine proton appears in the 8.5–8.7 p.p.m. range, while the imine bond is characterized in the 13C RMN spectrum with the imine C and OH signals in the range 162.23–163.34 p.p.m. 1H NMR: δ = 6.5–7.6 (m, 12H; H-ar), δ = 13.7 (s, 1H; OH), δ = 5.1 (s, 1H; CH–O). 13C NMR: 70.15, 120.33, 127.30, 127.64, 128.26, 128.75, 142.32, 162.23, 163.33, 163.34.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The hydroxyl H atom was located in a difference-Fourier map and initially freely refined. In the final cycles of refinements it was positioned geometrically (O—H = 0.82 Å) and refined as riding with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O). The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C–H = 0.93–0.97 Å) and refined as riding with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC34H28N2O4
M r 528.58
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, C m c21
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)35.297 (3), 9.3902 (6), 8.3603 (5)
V3)2771.0 (3)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.03 × 0.02 × 0.01
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections4493, 2516, 1691
R int 0.042
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.651
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.053, 0.158, 1.02
No. of reflections2516
No. of parameters185
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.29, −0.24

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2011 ▸), SHELXT2017 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al.2008 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) Global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018005832/su5438sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018005832/su5438Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018005832/su5438Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1837095 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C34H28N2O4F(000) = 1112
Mr = 528.58Dx = 1.267 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Cmc21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C 2c -2Cell parameters from 1621 reflections
a = 35.297 (3) Åθ = 2.2–21.3°
b = 9.3902 (6) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 8.3603 (5) ÅT = 293 K
V = 2771.0 (3) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.03 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometerRint = 0.042
Detector resolution: 18.4 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.7°
φ and ω scansh = −45→40
4493 measured reflectionsk = −12→5
2516 independent reflectionsl = −10→6
1691 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.158H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0817P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2516 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
185 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.24 e Å3
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.05052 (9)0.2350 (3)0.3234 (5)0.0693 (13)
O20.15676 (8)0.0288 (3)0.5919 (4)0.0546 (9)
N10.03881 (9)0.5084 (4)0.3640 (5)0.0487 (10)
C10.01955 (13)0.8879 (4)0.2654 (7)0.0639 (15)
C20.03890 (12)0.7645 (4)0.2985 (6)0.0567 (14)
C30.01982 (11)0.6379 (4)0.3322 (5)0.0481 (11)
C40.06841 (12)0.5103 (4)0.4519 (6)0.0495 (14)
C50.09057 (11)0.3828 (4)0.4833 (5)0.0454 (11)
C60.08042 (11)0.2506 (4)0.4207 (5)0.0475 (11)
C70.10168 (11)0.1285 (4)0.4566 (5)0.0488 (11)
C80.13349 (11)0.1401 (4)0.5523 (5)0.0463 (12)
C90.14420 (12)0.2710 (4)0.6146 (6)0.0560 (16)
C100.12269 (12)0.3889 (4)0.5813 (5)0.0560 (16)
C110.14781 (12)−0.1086 (4)0.5260 (6)0.0547 (16)
C120.17886 (11)−0.2104 (4)0.5695 (5)0.0449 (11)
C130.17544 (12)−0.2993 (4)0.6998 (6)0.0543 (16)
C140.20330 (16)−0.3988 (4)0.7345 (6)0.0677 (17)
C150.23502 (14)−0.4070 (5)0.6404 (7)0.0700 (19)
C160.23920 (14)−0.3165 (6)0.5124 (7)0.0697 (17)
C170.21118 (13)−0.2190 (5)0.4765 (6)0.0617 (17)
H10.032760.971210.243010.0770*
H1O0.040380.312540.309330.1040*
H20.065240.765290.298510.0680*
H40.0777 (10)0.604 (4)0.509 (5)0.041 (9)*
H70.094420.040300.416350.0580*
H90.165710.278720.678240.0670*
H100.129680.475940.625290.0670*
H11A0.12385−0.142140.568620.0660*
H11B0.14557−0.102030.410610.0660*
H130.15420−0.292590.765160.0650*
H140.20047−0.459740.821410.0810*
H150.25371−0.473780.663110.0840*
H160.26095−0.320990.449790.0840*
H170.21407−0.158600.389150.0740*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0640 (19)0.0400 (16)0.104 (3)0.0056 (14)−0.0359 (19)−0.0063 (17)
O20.0595 (17)0.0386 (14)0.0658 (17)0.0080 (12)−0.0166 (15)−0.0028 (14)
N10.0416 (17)0.0335 (16)0.071 (2)0.0021 (14)0.0019 (18)0.0024 (15)
C10.063 (3)0.0317 (19)0.097 (3)−0.0042 (16)−0.001 (3)0.003 (2)
C20.047 (2)0.041 (2)0.082 (3)−0.0048 (17)−0.002 (2)0.000 (2)
C30.049 (2)0.0322 (18)0.063 (2)0.0022 (16)0.002 (2)−0.0028 (17)
C40.049 (2)0.0345 (19)0.065 (3)0.0002 (17)0.003 (2)−0.0024 (18)
C50.042 (2)0.0373 (19)0.057 (2)−0.0015 (16)0.002 (2)−0.0033 (18)
C60.042 (2)0.0364 (19)0.064 (2)−0.0017 (16)−0.008 (2)−0.0015 (17)
C70.051 (2)0.0365 (18)0.059 (2)−0.0007 (16)−0.010 (2)−0.0041 (19)
C80.047 (2)0.039 (2)0.053 (2)0.0063 (16)−0.0047 (19)0.0005 (17)
C90.058 (3)0.045 (2)0.065 (3)−0.0010 (18)−0.017 (2)−0.003 (2)
C100.060 (3)0.039 (2)0.069 (3)−0.0035 (18)−0.011 (2)−0.006 (2)
C110.059 (3)0.041 (2)0.064 (3)0.0043 (19)−0.013 (2)−0.0047 (19)
C120.043 (2)0.0378 (19)0.054 (2)0.0001 (16)−0.0069 (18)−0.0056 (18)
C130.054 (3)0.049 (2)0.060 (3)0.0042 (18)−0.004 (2)−0.001 (2)
C140.082 (3)0.051 (3)0.070 (3)0.013 (2)−0.021 (3)0.005 (2)
C150.060 (3)0.055 (3)0.095 (4)0.020 (2)−0.023 (3)−0.028 (3)
C160.053 (3)0.075 (3)0.081 (3)0.006 (2)0.001 (3)−0.021 (3)
C170.062 (3)0.057 (3)0.066 (3)−0.005 (2)−0.002 (2)−0.001 (2)
O1—C61.341 (5)C12—C131.378 (6)
O2—C81.370 (5)C13—C141.387 (6)
O2—C111.438 (5)C14—C151.371 (8)
N1—C31.414 (5)C15—C161.374 (8)
N1—C41.278 (6)C16—C171.381 (7)
O1—H1O0.8200C1—H10.9300
C1—C1i1.380 (6)C2—H20.9300
C1—C21.373 (6)C4—H41.05 (4)
C2—C31.395 (5)C7—H70.9300
C3—C3i1.399 (5)C9—H90.9300
C4—C51.454 (5)C10—H100.9300
C5—C101.400 (6)C11—H11A0.9700
C5—C61.394 (5)C11—H11B0.9700
C6—C71.403 (5)C13—H130.9300
C7—C81.383 (6)C14—H140.9300
C8—C91.388 (6)C15—H150.9300
C9—C101.371 (6)C16—H160.9300
C11—C121.499 (6)C17—H170.9300
C12—C171.383 (6)
C8—O2—C11117.4 (3)C12—C17—C16120.5 (5)
C3—N1—C4118.9 (4)C2—C1—H1120.00
C6—O1—H1O109.00C1i—C1—H1120.00
C1i—C1—C2119.8 (4)C1—C2—H2119.00
C1—C2—C3121.3 (4)C3—C2—H2119.00
N1—C3—C3i118.3 (3)N1—C4—H4122 (2)
C2—C3—C3i118.9 (4)C5—C4—H4116 (2)
N1—C3—C2122.8 (4)C6—C7—H7120.00
N1—C4—C5122.2 (4)C8—C7—H7120.00
C4—C5—C10120.5 (4)C8—C9—H9120.00
C6—C5—C10117.7 (3)C10—C9—H9120.00
C4—C5—C6121.8 (4)C5—C10—H10119.00
O1—C6—C7117.5 (3)C9—C10—H10119.00
C5—C6—C7120.7 (4)O2—C11—H11A110.00
O1—C6—C5121.8 (3)O2—C11—H11B110.00
C6—C7—C8119.6 (4)C12—C11—H11A110.00
O2—C8—C9115.0 (4)C12—C11—H11B110.00
C7—C8—C9120.5 (4)H11A—C11—H11B108.00
O2—C8—C7124.5 (3)C12—C13—H13120.00
C8—C9—C10119.2 (4)C14—C13—H13120.00
C5—C10—C9122.3 (4)C13—C14—H14120.00
O2—C11—C12108.6 (3)C15—C14—H14120.00
C11—C12—C13120.9 (4)C14—C15—H15120.00
C13—C12—C17118.8 (4)C16—C15—H15120.00
C11—C12—C17120.3 (4)C15—C16—H16120.00
C12—C13—C14120.8 (4)C17—C16—H16120.00
C13—C14—C15119.8 (4)C12—C17—H17120.00
C14—C15—C16120.0 (5)C16—C17—H17120.00
C15—C16—C17120.2 (5)
C11—O2—C8—C71.5 (6)C4—C5—C10—C9179.6 (4)
C11—O2—C8—C9−177.8 (4)C6—C5—C10—C90.9 (6)
C8—O2—C11—C12174.0 (3)O1—C6—C7—C8177.9 (4)
C4—N1—C3—C241.3 (6)C5—C6—C7—C8−1.4 (6)
C4—N1—C3—C3i−139.8 (4)C6—C7—C8—O2−178.4 (4)
C3—N1—C4—C5−176.8 (4)C6—C7—C8—C90.9 (6)
C1i—C1—C2—C30.1 (8)O2—C8—C9—C10179.9 (4)
C2—C1—C1i—C2i0.0 (9)C7—C8—C9—C100.5 (7)
C1—C2—C3—N1178.9 (5)C8—C9—C10—C5−1.4 (7)
C1—C2—C3—C3i−0.1 (7)O2—C11—C12—C1396.8 (4)
N1—C3—C3i—N1i0.0 (6)O2—C11—C12—C17−84.8 (5)
N1—C3—C3i—C2i−179.0 (4)C11—C12—C13—C14176.4 (4)
C2—C3—C3i—N1i179.0 (4)C17—C12—C13—C14−2.0 (6)
C2—C3—C3i—C2i0.0 (6)C11—C12—C17—C16−177.4 (4)
N1—C4—C5—C6−0.9 (7)C13—C12—C17—C161.0 (7)
N1—C4—C5—C10−179.5 (4)C12—C13—C14—C151.4 (7)
C4—C5—C6—O12.6 (6)C13—C14—C15—C160.2 (7)
C4—C5—C6—C7−178.2 (4)C14—C15—C16—C17−1.2 (8)
C10—C5—C6—O1−178.8 (4)C15—C16—C17—C120.6 (8)
C10—C5—C6—C70.5 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1O···N10.821.902.622 (5)147
C2—H2···Cg2ii0.932.883.499 (5)125
C13—H13···Cg2iii0.932.603.493 (5)161
  15 in total

1.  Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupric ion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method.

Authors:  Resat Apak; Kubilay Güçlü; Mustafa Ozyürek; Saliha Esin Karademir
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2004-12-29       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of some schiff bases of [4-(amino)-5-phenyl-4H-1, 2,4-triazole-3-thiol].

Authors:  Selvaraj Jubie; Pranabesh Sikdar; Shanish Antony; Rajagopal Kalirajan; Byran Gowramma; Subramanian Gomathy; Kannan Elango
Journal:  Pak J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.684

4.  5,5'-Dimeth-oxy-2,2'-[4,5-dimethyl-o-phenyl-enebis(nitrilo-methyl-idyne)]diphenol.

Authors:  Hadi Kargar; Reza Kia; Islam Ullah Khan; Atefeh Sahraei; Parviz Aberoomand Azar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-03-03

5.  Syntheses and characterization of Ru(III) with chelating containing ONNO donor quadridentate Schiff bases.

Authors:  Moamen S Refat; Sabry A El-Korashy; Deo Nandan Kumar; Ahmed S Ahmed
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  2-[N-(4-{4-[(E)-(2-Hydroxybenzyl-idene)amino]phenoxy}phenyl)carbox-imidoyl]phenol.

Authors:  Gholam Hossein Shahverdizadeh; Edward R T Tiekink
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-03-05

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.