Literature DB >> 29850057

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of tetra-aqua-bis-(isonicotinamide-κN1)cobalt(II) fumarate.

Sevgi Kansiz1, Zainab M Almarhoon2, Necmi Dege1.   

Abstract

The reaction of cobalt(II) with fumaric acid (H2fum) and isonicotinamide in a basic solution produces the title salt, [Co(C6H6N2O)2(H2O)4](C4H2O4). In the complex cation, the CoII atom, located on an inversion centre, is coordinated by two isonicotinamide and four water mol-ecules in a distorted N2O4 octa-hedral geometry. The fumarate anion is located on another inversion centre and is linked to neighbouring complex cations via O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds. In the crystal, the complex cations are further linked by O-H⋯O, N-H⋯O and weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional supra-molecular architectecture. Hirshfeld surface analyses (dnorm surfaces and two-dimensional fingerprint plots) for the title compound are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surfaces; cobalt(II); crystal structure; fumaric acid; isonicotinamide

Year:  2018        PMID: 29850057      PMCID: PMC5956340          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800107X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Metal carboxyl­ates have attracted intense attention because of their inter­esting framework topologies (Rao et al., 2004 ▸). Among metal carboxyl­ates, fumarate dianions (fum) have good conformational freedom and they possess some desirable features such as being versatile ligands because of the four electron-donor oxygen atoms they carry, and their ability to link inorganic moieties (Zheng et al., 2003 ▸). Moreover, metal fumarates exhibit interesting structural varieties. Di­carb­oxy­lic acids such as fumaric acid and amides have been particularly useful in creating many supra­molecular structures involving isonicotinamide and a variety of carb­oxy­lic acid mol­ecules (Vishweshwar et al., 2003 ▸; Aakeröy et al., 2002 ▸). Di­carb­oxy­lic acid ligands are utilized in the synthesis of a wide variety of metal carboxyl­ates. For this reason they have been investigated extensively, both experimentally and computationally. We describe herein the synthesis, structural features and Hirshfeld surface analysis of the title salt.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 1 ▸. The CoII cation and midpoint of the C=C bond of the fumarate anion are each located on an inversion centre. In the complex cation, the CoII atom is coordinated to two isonicotinamide ligands and four water mol­ecules in a distorted N2O4 octa­hedral geometry. The fumarate anion interacts with neighboring complex cations via O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) –x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (vii) –x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 2.]

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2A⋯O5i 0.861.962.814 (2)171
O2—H2B⋯O4ii 0.861.882.7165 (19)165
O3—H3A⋯O1iii 0.861.952.792 (2)168
O3—H3B⋯O40.861.822.6652 (19)172
N2—H2C⋯O5iv 0.862.132.955 (2)160
N2—H2D⋯O1v 0.862.473.288 (3)159
C1—H1⋯O4vi 0.932.413.322 (2)168
C2—H2⋯O1v 0.932.303.225 (3)173

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, the fumarate anions and complex cations are linked by O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds; the complex cations also interact with each other through O—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular architecture (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 2 ▸).
Figure 2

Packing of the title compound in the unit cell. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

Crystal Explorer 17.5 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸) was used to analyse the inter­actions in the crystal and fingerprint plots mapped over d norm (Figs. 3 ▸ and 4 ▸) were generated. The contact distances to the closest atom inside (d) and outside (d) of the Hirshfeld surface are used to analyse the inter­molecular inter­actions via the mapping of d norm. The mol­ecular Hirshfeld surfaces were obtained using a standard (high) surface resolution with the three-dimensional d norm surfaces mapped over a fixed colour scale of −1.227 (red) to 1.279 (blue). Many studies on Hirshfeld surfaces can be found in the literature (see, for example, Şen et al., 2018 ▸; Yaman et al., 2018 ▸).
Figure 3

The Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped with d norm. The red spots indicate the regions of the donor–acceptor inter­actions.

Figure 4

d norm mapped on the Hirshfeld surfaces for the title structure.

In a d norm surface, any inter­molecular inter­actions will appear as red spots. The red spots indicate the regions of donor–acceptor inter­actions. There are many red spots in the d norm surface (Fig. 3 ▸), which are usually on the O-acceptor atoms involved in the inter­actions listed in Table 1 ▸. Strong hydrogen-bond inter­actions, such as O—H⋯O, are seen as a bright-red areas on the Hirshfeld surfaces (Şen et al., 2017 ▸). The fingerprint plot for the title complex is presented in Fig. 5 ▸. The H⋯H inter­actions appear in the middle of the scattered points in the two-dimensional fingerprint plots with an overall contribution to the Hirshfeld surface of 35.5% (Fig. 6 ▸ b). The contribution from the O⋯H/H⋯O contacts, corresponding to C—H⋯O, N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O inter­actions, is represented by a pair of sharp spikes characteristic of a strong hydrogen-bond inter­action (35.9%) (Fig. 6 ▸ a). The CC/CC contacts have a sharp spike between the O⋯H and H⋯O spikes (5.7%) (Fig. 6 ▸ d). The contribution of the other inter­molecular contacts to the Hirshfeld surfaces is C⋯H/H⋯C (10.3%) (Fig. 6 ▸ c).
Figure 5

A fingerprint plot of the title complex.

Figure 6

(a) O⋯H/H⋯O, (b) H⋯H/H⋯H, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C and (d) C⋯C/C⋯C contacts in the title complex, showing the percentages of contacts contributing to the total Hirshfeld surface area.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database for fumaric acid and isonicotinamide revealed the presence of seven structures: isonicotinohyrazide nicotinamide fumaric acid (Aitipamula et al., 2013 ▸), catena-poly[[aqua­bis­[N-(pyridin-3-yl)isonicotinamide-κN 1)copper(II)]-(μ2-fumarato-κO,O′)-(Qiblawi & LaDuca, 2012 ▸), bis­(isonicotinamide) fumaric acid (Aakeröy et al., 2002 ▸), catena-[bis­(μ2-fumarato)bis­(μ2-3-pyridyl­isonicotinamide)­dizinctrihydrate] (Uebler et al., 2013 ▸) and catena-[bis­(μ-but-2-enedioato)bis­(μ-pyridine-4-carbohydrazide)dizinc(II)] (Naskar et al., 2017 ▸). In these compounds, the C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds have H⋯O distances ranging from 2.56 to 3.59 Å and C⋯O distances ranging from 3.27 to 3.96 Å. The N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds have H⋯O distances ranging from 1.86 to 2.33 Å and N⋯O distances ranging from 2.82 to 3.15 Å.

Synthesis and crystallization

An aqueous solution of fumaric acid (26 mmol, 3 g) in water was added to a solution of NaOH (52 mmol, 2.07 g) while stirring. A solution of CoCl2·6H2O (25 mmol, 6.19 g) in water was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for an hour at room temperature. The pink mixture was filtered and left to dry. The pink crystals (0.88 mmol, 0.20 g) were dissolved in water and added to an aqueous solution of isonicotinamide (1.75 mmol, 0.21 g). The resulting suspension was filtered and allowed to crystallize for five weeks at room temperature yielding orange block-shaped crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The N-bound and C-bound hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding: N—H = 0.86 Å and C—H = 0.93 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C,N). Water H atoms were found in a difference-Fourier map, restrained with O—H = 0.85 Å and refined with U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Co(C6H6N2O)2(H2O)4](C4H2O4)
M r 489.30
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)9.6914 (10), 10.0106 (11), 11.3811 (12)
β (°)113.416 (3)
V3)1013.22 (19)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.91
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.19 × 0.16
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionAnalytical (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)
T min, T max 0.394, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections19963, 1962, 1830
R int 0.032
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.617
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.032, 0.077, 1.14
No. of reflections1962
No. of parameters144
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.35, −0.35

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▸), SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800107X/xu5915sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901800107X/xu5915Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1561543 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[Co(C6H6N2O)2(H2O)4](C4H2O4)F(000) = 506
Mr = 489.30Dx = 1.604 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.6914 (10) ÅCell parameters from 9553 reflections
b = 10.0106 (11) Åθ = 3.1–28.3°
c = 11.3811 (12) ŵ = 0.91 mm1
β = 113.416 (3)°T = 296 K
V = 1013.22 (19) Å3Block, orange
Z = 20.25 × 0.19 × 0.16 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1830 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.032
Absorption correction: analytical (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.1°
Tmin = 0.394, Tmax = 0.746h = −11→11
19963 measured reflectionsk = −12→12
1962 independent reflectionsl = −14→13
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.077w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0211P)2 + 1.1735P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.14(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1962 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.35 e Å3
144 parametersΔρmin = −0.35 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Co10.5000000.5000000.5000000.01658 (12)
O30.60307 (15)0.65750 (13)0.62150 (13)0.0237 (3)
H3A0.6964040.6602640.6350170.035*
H3B0.5945750.6468600.6929160.035*
O20.39661 (15)0.64187 (13)0.35319 (13)0.0240 (3)
H2A0.3689230.6041650.2798360.036*
H2B0.4589530.7044450.3582000.036*
O40.55105 (17)0.63859 (14)0.83392 (14)0.0283 (3)
O1−0.09235 (17)0.70328 (16)0.68073 (17)0.0365 (4)
O50.72605 (18)0.48025 (16)0.88934 (16)0.0356 (4)
N10.31337 (18)0.52596 (16)0.55744 (16)0.0208 (3)
C70.6189 (2)0.54056 (19)0.90123 (18)0.0221 (4)
C30.1007 (2)0.5713 (2)0.66124 (18)0.0216 (4)
C80.5656 (2)0.48648 (19)0.99864 (19)0.0239 (4)
H80.6298710.4299511.0614280.029*
N2−0.0347 (3)0.5112 (2)0.7922 (2)0.0491 (6)
H2C−0.1021550.5235210.8224130.059*
H2D0.0208260.4409360.8128610.059*
C40.1453 (2)0.6727 (2)0.6015 (2)0.0268 (4)
H40.1039780.7576650.5945490.032*
C20.1627 (2)0.4464 (2)0.6655 (2)0.0297 (5)
H20.1344410.3752480.7035640.036*
C6−0.0163 (2)0.6003 (2)0.7141 (2)0.0279 (4)
C50.2516 (2)0.64642 (19)0.5523 (2)0.0263 (4)
H50.2817570.7158920.5136270.032*
C10.2671 (2)0.4283 (2)0.6126 (2)0.0275 (4)
H10.3073960.3433820.6156910.033*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.01724 (19)0.01624 (19)0.0214 (2)−0.00028 (12)0.01310 (14)0.00056 (13)
O30.0239 (7)0.0251 (7)0.0276 (7)−0.0036 (6)0.0162 (6)−0.0033 (6)
O20.0259 (7)0.0220 (7)0.0258 (7)−0.0015 (5)0.0121 (6)0.0031 (5)
O40.0421 (8)0.0219 (7)0.0319 (7)0.0059 (6)0.0264 (7)0.0046 (6)
O10.0332 (8)0.0303 (8)0.0602 (11)−0.0001 (7)0.0334 (8)−0.0075 (7)
O50.0354 (8)0.0430 (9)0.0409 (9)0.0129 (7)0.0284 (7)0.0091 (7)
N10.0207 (8)0.0199 (8)0.0274 (8)−0.0003 (6)0.0154 (7)−0.0003 (6)
C70.0262 (9)0.0217 (9)0.0234 (9)−0.0018 (8)0.0151 (8)−0.0023 (8)
C30.0178 (9)0.0268 (10)0.0247 (9)−0.0017 (7)0.0134 (7)−0.0023 (8)
C80.0282 (10)0.0240 (10)0.0243 (10)0.0033 (8)0.0155 (8)0.0037 (7)
N20.0411 (12)0.0675 (15)0.0591 (14)0.0163 (11)0.0416 (11)0.0225 (11)
C40.0285 (10)0.0182 (9)0.0425 (12)0.0012 (8)0.0234 (9)−0.0016 (8)
C20.0303 (10)0.0270 (10)0.0428 (12)0.0024 (9)0.0261 (10)0.0110 (9)
C60.0208 (9)0.0359 (12)0.0330 (11)−0.0056 (9)0.0170 (8)−0.0089 (9)
C50.0300 (10)0.0191 (9)0.0397 (11)−0.0005 (8)0.0245 (9)0.0032 (8)
C10.0274 (10)0.0204 (10)0.0432 (12)0.0039 (8)0.0229 (9)0.0058 (8)
Co1—O3i2.0731 (13)C7—C81.498 (3)
Co1—O32.0731 (13)C3—C21.380 (3)
Co1—O2i2.1171 (13)C3—C41.383 (3)
Co1—O22.1171 (13)C3—C61.509 (3)
Co1—N12.1694 (16)C8—C8ii1.313 (4)
Co1—N1i2.1694 (16)C8—H80.9300
O3—H3A0.8556N2—C61.320 (3)
O3—H3B0.8555N2—H2C0.8600
O2—H2A0.8564N2—H2D0.8600
O2—H2B0.8564C4—C51.380 (3)
O4—C71.258 (2)C4—H40.9300
O1—C61.236 (3)C2—C11.379 (3)
O5—C71.254 (2)C2—H20.9300
N1—C11.332 (3)C5—H50.9300
N1—C51.337 (2)C1—H10.9300
O3i—Co1—O3180.0O4—C7—C8118.86 (17)
O3i—Co1—O2i88.15 (6)C2—C3—C4117.75 (17)
O3—Co1—O2i91.85 (6)C2—C3—C6123.14 (18)
O3i—Co1—O291.85 (6)C4—C3—C6119.07 (18)
O3—Co1—O288.15 (6)C8ii—C8—C7124.4 (2)
O2i—Co1—O2180.0C8ii—C8—H8117.8
O3i—Co1—N193.08 (6)C7—C8—H8117.8
O3—Co1—N186.92 (6)C6—N2—H2C120.0
O2i—Co1—N191.85 (6)C6—N2—H2D120.0
O2—Co1—N188.15 (6)H2C—N2—H2D120.0
O3i—Co1—N1i86.92 (6)C5—C4—C3119.29 (18)
O3—Co1—N1i93.08 (6)C5—C4—H4120.4
O2i—Co1—N1i88.14 (6)C3—C4—H4120.4
O2—Co1—N1i91.85 (6)C1—C2—C3119.26 (18)
N1—Co1—N1i180.0C1—C2—H2120.4
Co1—O3—H3A109.8C3—C2—H2120.4
Co1—O3—H3B109.6O1—C6—N2123.2 (2)
H3A—O3—H3B109.1O1—C6—C3119.28 (19)
Co1—O2—H2A109.9N2—C6—C3117.5 (2)
Co1—O2—H2B109.8N1—C5—C4123.21 (18)
H2A—O2—H2B109.1N1—C5—H5118.4
C1—N1—C5117.00 (16)C4—C5—H5118.4
C1—N1—Co1122.07 (13)N1—C1—C2123.47 (19)
C5—N1—Co1120.48 (13)N1—C1—H1118.3
O5—C7—O4124.37 (18)C2—C1—H1118.3
O5—C7—C8116.71 (18)
O5—C7—C8—C8ii−161.6 (3)C2—C3—C6—N215.6 (3)
O4—C7—C8—C8ii15.7 (4)C4—C3—C6—N2−166.7 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.8 (3)C1—N1—C5—C40.4 (3)
C6—C3—C4—C5−179.59 (19)Co1—N1—C5—C4−172.01 (17)
C4—C3—C2—C11.1 (3)C3—C4—C5—N11.1 (3)
C6—C3—C2—C1178.8 (2)C5—N1—C1—C2−1.2 (3)
C2—C3—C6—O1−162.7 (2)Co1—N1—C1—C2171.10 (17)
C4—C3—C6—O114.9 (3)C3—C2—C1—N10.5 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2A···O5i0.861.962.814 (2)171
O2—H2B···O4iii0.861.882.7165 (19)165
O3—H3A···O1iv0.861.952.792 (2)168
O3—H3B···O40.861.822.6652 (19)172
N2—H2C···O5v0.862.132.955 (2)160
N2—H2D···O1vi0.862.473.288 (3)159
C1—H1···O4vii0.932.413.322 (2)168
C2—H2···O1vi0.932.303.225 (3)173
  7 in total

1.  A high-yielding supramolecular reaction.

Authors:  Christer B Aakeröy; Alicia M Beatty; Brian A Helfrich
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Metal carboxylates with open architectures.

Authors:  C N R Rao; Srinivasan Natarajan; R Vaidhyanathan
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A one-dimensional copper(II) coordination polymer incorporating succinate and N,N-diethylethylenediamine ligands: crystallographic analysis, vibrational and surface features, and DFT analysis.

Authors:  Fatih Şen; Sevgi Kansiz; İbrahim Uçar
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  catena-Poly[[aquabis[N-(pyridin-3-yl)isonicotinamide-κN (1)]copper(II)]-μ-fumarato-κ(2) O (1):O (4)].

Authors:  Sultan H Qiblawi; Robert L Laduca
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-11-24

7.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.