| Literature DB >> 29849751 |
Yuri Okamoto1, Yoshie Miyake1, Ichie Nagasawa1, Masaharu Yoshihara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the necessity of early intervention for students with potential bulimia by investigating how the eating attitudes of college students change and examining the relation between bulimic symptoms and depressive symptoms or the ability to cope with stress.Entities:
Keywords: Cohort; College students; Depressive symptoms; Eating disorder; Prevention; Stress coping; Subthreshold
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849751 PMCID: PMC5968577 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-018-0127-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopsychosoc Med ISSN: 1751-0759
Characteristics of participants
| Time-1 | Time-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Males | N = 977 | N = 330 |
| Age (years) | 20.0 ± 2.1 | 22.6 ± 3.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.0 ± 2.8 | 21.3 ± 3.1 |
| Females | ||
| Age (years) | 19.0 ± 2.5 | 22.3 ± 0.9 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.0 ± 2.5 | 20.6 ± 2.4 |
Male EAT, BITE, BDI, CISS scores at Times1 and 2
| Time-1 | Time-2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 330 | N = 330 | ||
| EAT-26 | 2.7 ± 3.5 | 2.1 ± 3.1 | 0.006** |
| BITE | 4.2 ± 3.4 | 4.7 ± 4.0 | 0.002** |
| BDI-II | 5.3 ± 5.1 | 7.6 ± 6.9 | 0.000** |
| CISS-T | 43.9 ± 8.7 | 42.9 ± 7.1 | 0.08 |
| CISS-E | 46.2 ± 9.1 | 45.3 ± 7.6 | 0.07 |
| CISS-A | 50.7 ± 9.2 | 50.5 ± 7.8 | 0.81 |
EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test-26, BITE Bulimic Inventory Test, Edinburgh, BDI-II Beck Depression Inventory-II
**p < 0.01
Female EAT, BITE, BDI, CISS scores at Times 1 and 2
| Time-1 | Time-2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 290 | N = 290 | ||
| EAT-26 | 3.6 ± 4.9 | 2.9 ± 4.7 | 0.051 |
| BITE | 5.2 ± 4.2 | 6.3 ± 5.6 | 0.000** |
| BDI-II | 5.0 ± 5.7 | 7.9 ± 7.2 | 0.000** |
| CISS-T | 43.6 ± 7.2 | 44.0 ± 6.9 | 0.89 |
| CISS-E | 45.4 ± 8.0 | 45.5 ± 7.6 | 0.97 |
| CISS-A | 49.6 ± 8.3 | 48.5 ± 7.8 | 0.73 |
EAT-26 Eating Attitudes Test-26, BITE Bulimic Inventory Test, Edinburgh, BDI-II Beck Depression Inventory-II
**p < 0.01
Fig. 1Change in the BITE score of each student. Figure 1 shows the change in the BITE of each student, by sex. Although some students had lower BITE scores, more students had higher BITE score
Fig. 2Change in BITE scores. Two males in the subthreshold group shifted to the clinical group, 10 shifted to the subthreshold group, 15 shifted to the healthy group, and 25 in the healthy group shifted to the subthreshold group. Two females in the clinical group remained in this group, 5 in the subthreshold group shifted to the clinical group, 3 in the healthy group shifted to the clinical group, and 33 shifted to the subthreshold group
Comparison of BDI-II of the BITE improved, worsened, and unchanged groups
| Improved group | Worsened group | Unchanged group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 4.2 ± 3.4 | 4.7 ± 4.0* | 4.3 ± 3.8 |
| ( | ( | ( | |
| Female | 5.3 ± 5.1* | 7.6 ± 6.9** | 4.8 ± 4.2 |
| ( | ( | ( |
For males, the BDI of the worsened group was significantly higher than those of the improved and unchanged groups
For females, the BDI of the worsened group was significantly higher than those of the improved and unchanged groups, and the BDI of the improved group was significantly higher than that of the unchanged group
BITE Bulimic Inventory Test, Edinburgh, BDI-II Beck Depression Inventory-II
*p < .05
**p < 0.01
Comparison of the BDI-II and CISS of the subthreshold and healthy groups by BITE at Time-1
| Subthreshold group | Healthy group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | BDI-II | 9.4 ± 7.0 | 4.0 ± 4.8 | 0.005** |
| CISS-T | 43.1 ± 6.4 | 41.8 ± 7.2 | 0.454 | |
| CISS-E | 46.0 ± 7.2 | 44.2 ± 7.6 | 0.995 | |
| CISS-A | 50.0 ± 5.6 | 48.7 ± 8.0 | 0.087 | |
| Female | BDI-II | 10.0 ± 9.4 | 4.1 ± 4.2 | 0.000** |
| CISS-T | 46.5 ± 8.4 | 43.6 ± 6.2 | 0.046* | |
| CISS-E | 47.5 ± 9.1 | 45.2 ± 7.2 | 0.039* | |
| CISS-A | 49.6 ± 7.6 | 51.2 ± 8.9 | 0.146 | |
BITE Bulimic Inventory Test, Edinburgh, BDI-II Beck Depression Inventory-II, CISS-T Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Task-oriented coping, CISS-E CISS Emotion-oriented coping, CISS-A CISS Avoidance-oriented coping
*p < 0.05
**p < 0.01