| Literature DB >> 29849741 |
Claudia Westermann1, Dana Wendeler2, Albert Nienhaus1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infections are blood-borne, generally chronic and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to describe the results of therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in healthcare personnel.Entities:
Keywords: Blood-borne infections; Direct-acting antiviral agents; Healthcare personnel; Hepatitis C virus; Occupational exposure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849741 PMCID: PMC5970510 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-018-0197-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol ISSN: 1745-6673 Impact factor: 2.646
DAA treatment regimens and results (n = 180)
| Characteristic | Valid values | |
|---|---|---|
| n | % | |
| Therapies total (2/1) | 178 | |
| LDV, SOF | 88 | 49 |
| SOF, DCV | 29 | 16 |
| LDV, SOF, RBV | 17 | 10 |
| SOF, SMV | 11 | 6 |
| DSV, OBV, PTV, RTV, RBV | 11 | 6 |
| DSV, OBV, PTV, RTV | 9 | 5 |
| SOF, RBV | 7 | 4 |
| SOF, RBV, PEG-IFN | 3 | 2 |
| DCV, SOF, RBV | 1 | < 1 |
| SOF, SMV, RBV | 1 | < 1 |
| PEG-IFN, TVR, RBV | 1 | < 1 |
| Therapy result | ||
| Directly after therapy (1/< 1) | 179 | |
| ETR | 173 | 97 |
| Remission | 6 | 3 |
| Twelve weeks after therapy | 180 | |
| SVR12 | 170 | 94 |
| Remission/viral load unchanged | 6 | > 2 |
| Relapse | 4 | > 3 |
| Side effects (13/7) | 167 | |
| None | 110 | 66 |
| Headaches, nausea, sleep disorder | 43 | 26 |
| Skin reactions | 6 | 4 |
| Anaemia | 2 | > 1 |
| Depression, anxiety | 2 | > 1 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 2 | > 1 |
| Othera | 2 | > 1 |
aManifestation of advanced infection (hepatorenal syndrome n = 1, bleeding of oesophageal varices n = 1); DAA direct-acting antiviral agents, LDV ledipasvir, SOF sofosbuvir, DCV daclatasvir, RBV ribavirin, RTV ritonavir, SMV simeprevir, DSV dasabuvir, OBV ombitasvir, PTV paritaprevir, PEG-IFN pegylated interferon, TVR telaprevir, ETR end-of-treatment response, SVR12 sustained virologic response twelve weeks after therapy
Summary of univariate and logistic regression analysis for variables regarding treatment response SVR12 (n = 180)
| Univariate analysis | |||||
| Variable | Missing values | n total | % SVR12 rates | OR (95% CI) | |
| Cirrhosis (no/yes) | 28 | 152 (102/50) | 98% versus 86% | 0.12 (0.03–0.62) | < 0.01 |
| Treatment (naive/experienced) | 21 | 159 (45/114) | 97.8% versus 93.9% | 0.35 (0.04–2.90) | NS |
| RWA (≤50%/> 50%) | 5 | 175 (139/36) | 97.1% versus 86.1% | 0.18 (0.05–0.72) | < 0.05 |
| Gender (women/men) | 0 | 180 (133/47) | 96.2% versus 87.5% | 0.32 (0.09–1.19) | NS |
| Multivariate logistical regression model with SVR12 as end point | |||||
| Variable | Missing values | n total | OR (95% CI) | R2 | |
| Cirrhosis (no/yes) | 34 | 146 (98/48) | 0.098 (0.01–0.75) | < 0.05 | 0.242 |
| Treatment (naive/experienced) | 34 | 146 (42/104) | 0.42 (0.05–3.92) | NS | |
| Gender (women/men) | 34 | 146 (112/34) | 0.41 (0.08–2.18) | NS | |
| Agea | 34 | 146 | 1.11 (1.01–1.23) | < 0.05 | |
SVR12 sustained virologic response twelve weeks after therapy, RWA reduced work ability; Dependent variables - the first category is established as a reference;
aas a continuous variable; OR (odds ratio) for the primary end point of SVR12; NS non-significant
Reduced work ability before and after DAA therapy (n = 115)
| RWA as % | After DAA therapy | Overall | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before DAA therapy | 0 | 20 | 30–40 | 50–60 | 70–80 | 90–100 | n | % | |
| 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5.2 | |
| 20 | 38 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 40 | |
| 30–40 | 15 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 23.5 | |
| 50–60 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 17.4 | |
| 70–80 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 7.8 | |
| 90–100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6.1 | |
| Overall | n | 62 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 115 | |
| % | 53.9 | 11.3 | 16.5 | 6.1 | 7 | 5.2 | 100 | 100 | |
RWA reduced work ability, DAA direct-acting antiviral agents
Baseline characteristics (n = 180)
| Characteristic | Valid values | |
|---|---|---|
| n | % | |
| Gender | ||
| Women | 133 | 74 |
| Men | 47 | 26 |
| Age | ||
| Mean (SD) | 62 (10) | |
| Median/Minimum/Maximum | 62/21/88 | |
| Age group | ||
| 30–39 | 4 | 2 |
| 40–49 | 12 | 7 |
| 50–59 | 50 | 28 |
| 60–64 | 42 | 23 |
| ≥ 65a | 72 | 40 |
| Genotype (11/6) | ||
| 1 sub-type not recognised | 15 | 9 |
| 1a | 50 | 29 |
| 1b | 88 | 52 |
| 2 | 6 | 4 |
| 3 | 7 | 4 |
| 3a | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | < 1 |
| RWA % (5/3) | ||
| 0 < 20 | 12 | 7 |
| 20 | 59 | 34 |
| 30–40 | 46 | 26 |
| 50–60 | 35 | 20 |
| 70–80 | 11 | 6 |
| 90–100 | 12 | 7 |
| Stage of liver disease (28/16) | ||
| No findings | 37 | 24 |
| Fibrosis | 65 | 43 |
| Compensated cirrhosis | 37 | 24 |
| Decompensated cirrhosis | 13 | 9 |
| Therapy status (21/12) | ||
| Naive | 45 | 28 |
| Experienced | 114 | 72 |
astatutory retirement age; RWA reduced work ability, SD standard deviation