| Literature DB >> 29849716 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of acupuncture combined with auricular acupressure in chloasma treatment.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849716 PMCID: PMC5937619 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6438458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Flow chart of study. Note. n: number of patients.
Baseline characteristics.
| Variable | Acupuncture + auricular acupressure | Acupuncture | Oral vitamin C and vitamin E |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 18–29 yr | 14 (31.1) | 12 (26.7) | 11 (24.4) | |
| 30–39 yr | 27 (60.0) | 26 (57.8) | 27 (60.0) | |
| 40–49 yr | 3 (6.7) | 4 (8.9) | 4 (8.9) | |
| 50–59 yr | 1 (2.2) | 2 (4.4) | 3 (6.7) | |
| ≥60 yr | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Mean age (yr) | 37.5 ± 5.2 | 38.1 ± 4.8 | 36.9 ± 5.0 | 0.11 |
|
| 56.2 ± 6.1 | 55.0 ± 5.9 | 56.1 ± 6.3 | 0.52 |
|
| 159.1 ± 4.2 | 158.2 ± 4.1 | 158.1 ± 4.5 | 0.25 |
|
| 22.20 ± 2.0 | 21.97 ± 2.1 | 22.44 ± 2.2 | 0.31 |
|
| ||||
| 0–10 yr | 35 (77.8) | 33 (73.3) | 36 (80.0) | |
| 11–20 yr | 10 (22.2) | 11 (24.5) | 9 (20.0) | |
| 21–30 yr | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Mean duration (yr) | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 6.0 ± 1.0 | 5.7 ± 1.3 | 0.21 |
|
| 19 (42.2) | 21 (46.7) | 20 (44.4) | 0.18 |
|
|
| |||
| Single | 11 (24.4) | 16 (35.6) | 13 (28.9) | 40 (29.6) |
| Married | 34 (75.6) | 29 (64.4) | 32 (71.1) | 95 (70.4) |
|
| ||||
| Professional | 25 (55.6) | 24 (53.3) | 26 (57.8) | 75 (55.6%) |
| Housewife | 20 (44.4) | 21 (46.7) | 19 (42.2) | 60 (44.4%) |
|
| ||||
| Hormonal therapy | 1 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (1.5) |
| Sun exposure | 19 (42.2) | 18 (40.0) | 20 (44.4) | 57 (42.2) |
| Cosmetic use | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (1.5) |
| Smoking | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Note. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (n) with percentage (%).
Evaluation of therapeutic effect.
| Acupuncture + auricular acupressure | Acupuncture | Oral vitamin C and vitamin E | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Pretreatment score | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2 |
| Posttreatment score | 0.7 ± 0.15 | 1.3 ± 0.15 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
|
| |||
| Pretreatment score | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 |
| Posttreatment score | 0.7 ± 0.15 | 1.1 ± 0.15 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
|
| |||
| Basically cured | 34 (75.6) | 28 (62.2) | 17 (37.8) |
| Markedly effective | 5 (11.1) | 7 (15.6) | 9 (20.0) |
| Effective | 4 (8.9) | 6 (13.3) | 8 (17.8) |
| Ineffective | 2 (4.4) | 4 (8.9) | 11 (24.4) |
| Total effective rate (%) | 95.6 | 91.1 | 75.6 |
Note. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients (n) with percentage (%). Area and color of skin lesion: compared with the pretreatment level of the same group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; pre- and posttreatment difference compared with the control group; †P < 0.05 and ††P < 0.01. Treatment outcome: compared with control group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Hormone levels for pre- and posttreatment.
| Group | Total cases ( | FSH (mIU/mL) | LH (mIU/mL) | E2 (pg/mL) | P4 (ng/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture + auricular acupressure (group A) | 45 | Pretreatment | 5.56 ± 1.08 | 4.32 ± 0.97 | 155 ± 5.60 | 8.85 ± 0.29 |
| Posttreatment | 5.21 ± 0.98 | 4.58 ± 0.83 | 121 ± 5.25 | 12.95 ± 0.28 | ||
| Acupuncture (group B) | 45 | Pretreatment | 5.55 ± 1.18 | 4.32 ± 0.98 | 154 ± 5.65 | 8.88 ± 0.28 |
| Posttreatment | 5.26 ± 1.21 | 4.50 ± 0.87 | 132 ± 5.32 | 11.96 ± 0.27 | ||
| Oral vitamin C and vitamin E (control) (group C) | 45 | Pretreatment | 5.51 ± 1.14 | 4.30 ± 0.96 | 156 ± 5.78 | 8.89 ± 0.31 |
| Posttreatment | 5.31 ± 1.35 | 4.43 ± 0.88 | 140 ± 5.21 | 9.95 ± 0.29 |
Note. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, n: number of patients. Compared with the pretreatment level of the same group, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01; pre- and posttreatment difference compared with the control group, †P < 0.05 and ††P < 0.01.