| Literature DB >> 29849643 |
Mosotho J George1,2, Patrick B Njobeh3, Sefater Gbashi3, Gabriel O Adegoke3,4, Ian A Dubery2, Ntakadzeni E Madala2.
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from plants have been used in the fragrance industry since time immemorial. Herein we report on the rapid screening of VOCs from seeds of ripe Aframomum danielli (family, Zingiberaceae) using a polydimethylsiloxane fibre headspace solid phase microextraction coupled to a gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GC/MS) instrument. Portions of 0.25, 0.35, and 0.50 g of ground sample were weighed and extraction of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was achieved using a 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane solid phase microextraction (PDMS SPME) fibre, with the equilibrium time of 40 minutes and extraction temperature of 50°C; the following compounds with their respective relative abundances were obtained as the top ten most abundant and annotated ones using NIST, Wiley, and Fragrances Libraries: eucalyptol (58%); β-pinene (22%); α-pinene (7.5%); α-terpineol (4%), α-terpinyl acetate (2%); α-bergamotene (1%); pinocarveol (0.39%); α-copaene (0.35%); caryophyllene (0.34); and β-bisabolene (0.31%). These compounds have been reported elsewhere in the literature and listed in the Fragrances Library, incorporated into the Saturn QP2020 GCMS Solution® software used for their analysis.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849643 PMCID: PMC5933046 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8976304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Figure 1A chromatogram of the VOCs following a 40-minute extraction at 50°C: (a) depicts the chromatogram standardised against the largest peak (at about 7.5 min) expanded to cover the region between 2.5 and 17.5 minutes while (b) depicts 10 times magnified chromatogram showing several tens of peaks that are not visible in (a) due to their low relative abundances compared to the seven peaks visible in (a).
Some chromatographic data and tentative annotation of the top ten most abundant VOCs obtained from the headspace extraction of the ground A. danielli seeds.
| Peak | Retention time (min) | Compound name | RMM | Ref Ion | Qual Ion | Different library matches (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIST | FFSC | Wiley | ||||||
| (1) | 5.087 |
| 136 | 93 | 77 | 96 | 96 | 97 |
| (2) | 6.086 |
| 136 | 93 | 69 | 96 | 96 | 97 |
| (3) | 7.259 | Eucalyptol | 154 | 81 | 154 | 91 | 89 | 91 |
| (4) | 10.082 |
| 154 | 59 | 136 | 94 | 94 | 96 |
| (5) | 12.434 |
| 196 | 121 | 93 | 93 | 95 | 96 |
| (6) | 13.515 | Bergamotene | 204 | 119 | 93 | 95 | 95 | 96 |
| (7) | 14.445 |
| 204 | 69 | 93 | 90 | 95 | 96 |
Key. RMM: relative molecular mass; Ref Ion: reference ion; Qual Ion: qualifier ion.
Figure 2The effect of varying the amount of sample on the production of the VOCs.
Figure 3The effect of varying temperature on the extraction of volatiles from A. danielli seeds.
Figure 4The effect of varying extraction time of volatiles of A. danielli.
Top 30 most abundant VOCs extracted from A. danielli seeds annotated using the three libraries listed in Table 1.
| Retention time (min) | Percentage abundance | Annotations | Literature reported ( | Literature reported (other plant species) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.02 | 0.15 |
| [ | |
| 4.134 | 7.58 |
| [ | |
| 4.898 | 22.11 |
| [ | |
| 5.886 | 58.10 | Eucalyptol | [ | |
| 6.173 | 0.08 |
| [ | |
| 6.294 | 0.09 | Sabinene hydrate 〈E〉 | [ | |
| 6.768 | 0.08 | Sabinene hydrate 〈Z〉 | [ | |
| 7.187 | 0.12 |
| [ | |
| 7.388 | 0.39 | Pinocarveol 〈Z〉 | [ | |
| 7.743 | 0.11 | Pinocarvone | [ | |
| 7.823 | 0.28 |
| [ | |
| 7.976 | 0.11 | Terpinen-4-ol | [ | |
| 8.235 | 4.08 |
| [ | |
| 8.594 | 0.21 | Carveol 〈Z〉 | [ | |
| 8.941 | 0.18 | Carvone | [ | |
| 10.271 | 0.21 | Carvyl acetate 〈Z〉 | [ | |
| 10.419 | 1.83 |
| [ | |
| 10.788 | 0.35 |
| [ | |
| 10.988 | 0.11 |
| [ | |
| 11.359 | 0.12 | Caryophyllene 〈(E)〉 | [ | |
| 11.553 | 1.17 |
| [ | |
| 11.73 | 0.09 | Valerena-4,7(11)-diene | [ | |
| 11.789 | 0.12 |
| [ | |
| 12.05 | 0.15 | Aciphyllene# | [ | |
| 12.168 | 0.34 | Caryophyllene (Z) | [ | |
| 12.356 | 0.21 | Isodaucene | [ | |
| 12.446 | 0.31 |
| [ | |
| 12.571 | 0.19 |
| [ | |
| 13.365 | 0.13 | Caryophyllene oxide | [ | |
| 14.493 | 0.07 |
| [ |
Annotation was made with the match of ≥85% from the NIST Library, with the lowest match of 85% obtained for the last three entries (sabinene hydrate 〈E〉, γ-terpinene, and α-bergamotol) with percentage abundances between 0.07 and 0.08%. The E isomer has been reported elsewhere to elute earlier than the “Z” isomer [28, 32]. #Also reported in bacteria.