| Literature DB >> 29849604 |
Yos Adi Prakoso1,2, Chylen Setiyo Rini1, Roeswandono Wirjaatmadja2.
Abstract
The tropical area has a lot of herbal medicines such as Aloe vera (AV), Ananas comosus (AC), and Sansevieria masoniana (SM). All the three have a unique potential effect as an antibacterial and wound-healing promoter. The aim of this study is to explore the role of AV, AC, and SM on the skin wound infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Forty-five adult female Sprague Dawley rats weighing 250-300 grams were divided into 5 groups. All the groups were exposed to two round full-thickness punch biopsy and infected with MRSA. The group C was the control group/untreated; group BC was treated with base cream/without extract; group AV was treated with 75% AV cream; group AC was treated with 75% AC cream, and group SM was treated with 75% SM cream. The wounds were observed on days 5, 10, and 15. The healing of skin wounds was measured by a percentage of closure, skin tensile strength, and histopathology. The result showed that AV, AC, and SM have a similar potential effect on healing in the wound that was infected with MRSA compared to the groups C and BC (P < 0.05). It shows that all the three herbal formulations can be used as the alternative therapy to the wound infected with MRSA.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849604 PMCID: PMC5933069 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4670569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharmacol Sci ISSN: 1687-6334
Qualitative phytochemical analysis of AV, AC, and SM extracts.
| Variable | Extract | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AV | AC | SM | |
| Tannin | + | + | + |
| Saponin | + | + | + |
| Flavonoid | + | + | — |
| Alkaloid | + | + | + |
| Phenol | — | — | + |
| Glycoside | + | — | + |
+ = present; — = absent.
Complete inhibition zone (mm) of the plant extracts in several concentrations.
| Extract | Concentration | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% | |
| AV | — | 8.46 ± 0.30 | 16.76 ± 0.61 | 24.23 ± 0.20∗ | 32.10 ± 0.20 |
| AC | — | 8.16 ± 0.41 | 13.63 ± 0.20 | 19.06 ± 0.20∗ | 25.20 ± 0.26 |
| SM | — | — | 9.26 ± 0.55 | 18.10 ± 1.60∗ | 26.20 ± 0.45 |
∗The effective concentration results based on disc diffusion method; — = absent.
Figure 1The PIDG indicates the percentage inhibition of MRSA against some concentration of AV, AC, and SM extracts.
Effects of the herbal cream formulation on the skin wound infected with MRSA.
| Parameter | Group | Day | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 10 | 15 | ||
| Percentage of wound closure (%) | 1 (C) | 3.60 ± 1.05 | 29.94 ± 2.72 | 54.36 ± 5.75 |
| 2 (BC) | 4.51 ± 1.37 | 32.04 ± 3.88 | 59.63 ± 2.69 | |
| 3 (AV) | 10.00 ± 0.76∗∗ | 64.17 ± 4.86∗∗ | 99.10 ± 1.18∗∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 12.82 ± 4.07∗∗ | 63.67 ± 5.80∗∗ | 99.06 ± 1.62∗∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 9.25 ± 0.78∗ | 42.04 ± 9.13∗ | 87.02 ± 9.49∗ | |
| Skin tensile strength (grams) | 1 (C) | NT | NT | 218.33 ± 9.50 |
| 2 (BC) | NT | NT | 219.33 ± 5.85 | |
| 3 (AV) | NT | NT | 578.00 ± 12.00∗∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | NT | NT | 566.67 ± 28.29∗∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | NT | NT | 500.67 ± 15.56∗ | |
| Angiogenesis | 1 (C) | 0.50 ± 0.54 | 0.83 ± 0.40 | 1.00 ± 0.63 |
| 2 (BC) | 0.50 ± 0.54 | 1.33 ± 0.51 | 1.66 ± 0.51 | |
| 3 (AV) | 1.50 ± 0.54∗ | 2.16 ± 0.40∗ | 2.66 ± 0.51∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 1.33 ± 0.51∗ | 1.83 ± 0.75∗ | 2.66 ± 0.81∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 1.16 ± 0.75∗ | 1.83 ± 0.75∗ | 2.50 ± 0.83∗ | |
| Inflammatory cells infiltration | 1 (C) | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.89 | 2.00 ± 0.63 |
| 2 (BC) | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 2.66 ± 0.51 | 2.16 ± 0.75 | |
| 3 (AV) | 2.50 ± 0.54∗ | 1.83 ± 0.75∗ | 0.83 ± 0.75∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 2.33 ± 0.51∗ | 2.00 ± 0.63∗ | 1.00 ± 0.63∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 2.50 ± 0.83∗ | 1.50 ± 0.83∗ | 1.33 ± 0.51∗ | |
| Fibroblast | 1 (C) | 0.66 ± 0.51 | 1.16 ± 0.75 | 1.50 ± 0.54 |
| 2 (BC) | 0.66 ± 0.81 | 1.50 ± 0.54 | 1.50 ± 0.54 | |
| 3 (AV) | 1.66 ± 0.51∗ | 2.00 ± 0.63∗ | 2.50 ± 0.83∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 1.33 ± 0.81∗ | 1.83 ± 0.40∗ | 2.66 ± 0.51∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 1.33 ± 0.81∗ | 2.00 ± 0.63∗ | 2.66 ± 0.51∗ | |
| Collagen deposition | 1 (C) | 0.16 ± 0.40 | 0.83 ± 0.40 | 1.33 ± 0.81 |
| 2 (BC) | 0.33 ± 0.51 | 1.00 ± 0.63 | 1.33 ± 0.81 | |
| 3 (AV) | 1.16 ± 0.40∗ | 1.66 ± 0.51∗ | 3.00 ± 0.00∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 0.66 ± 0.51∗ | 1.66 ± 0.51∗ | 2.50 ± 0.54∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 1.00 ± 0.63∗ | 1.66 ± 0.51∗ | 1.66 ± 0.51∗ | |
| Expression of CD8+ lymphocytes | 1 (C) | 0.16 ± 0.40 | 0.83 ± 0.75 | 1.33 ± 0.81 |
| 2 (BC) | 0.33 ± 0.51 | 0.66 ± 0.51 | 1.50 ± 0.54 | |
| 3 (AV) | 2.83 ± 0.40∗ | 2.33 ± 0.51∗ | 0.66 ± 0.51∗ | |
| 4 (AC) | 2.33 ± 0.81∗ | 2.16 ± 0.75∗ | 1.00 ± 0.63∗ | |
| 5 (SM) | 2.00 ± 1.26∗ | 2.00 ± 0.63∗ | 1.50 ± 0.54∗ | |
NT, not tested; the values are expressed as mean ± SD; ∗/∗∗the different superscript on the same column and parameter showed significantly different values (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Photomicrographs of the dermal part of the skin wound healing. Predominantly expression of CD8+ on day 5 in treatment group (a); skin wound of control group on day 5 showed severe necrosis with bacterial colonization (b); dermis of group BC (c); group AV (d); group AC (e); and dermis of group SM on day 15 (f). Note: CD8+ expression (arrowhead); fibroblast (arrow); bacterial colonization (bc); haemorrhage (h); inflammatory cells infiltration (i); necrosis (n); edema (o); neovascularization (v). CD8+, DAB, 100x, scale bar: 50 µm (a); H&E, 400x; scale bar: 50 µm (b–f).
Figure 3Photomicrographs of collagen deposition in the dermal part of the skin wound healing on day 15. Collagen deposition of group BC with predominant haemorrhage (a); predominantly old collagen deposition in the dermal part of group AV (b); collagen deposition of group AC (c); group SM (d). Note: erythrocytes (orange-red); new collagen fiber (light blue/arrow); old collagen fiber (deep blue/arrow head). Mallory, 400x; scale bar: 50 µm (a–d).