Literature DB >> 29849143

Rapid recovery of life at ground zero of the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.

Christopher M Lowery1, Timothy J Bralower2, Jeremy D Owens3, Francisco J Rodríguez-Tovar4, Heather Jones2, Jan Smit5, Michael T Whalen6, Phillipe Claeys7, Kenneth Farley8, Sean P S Gulick9, Joanna V Morgan10, Sophie Green11, Elise Chenot12, Gail L Christeson9, Charles S Cockell13, Marco J L Coolen14, Ludovic Ferrière15, Catalina Gebhardt16, Kazuhisa Goto17, David A Kring18, Johanna Lofi19, Rubén Ocampo-Torres20, Ligia Perez-Cruz21, Annemarie E Pickersgill22,23, Michael H Poelchau24, Auriol S P Rae10, Cornelia Rasmussen9, Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra25, Ulrich Riller26, Honami Sato27, Sonia M Tikoo28, Naotaka Tomioka29, Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi21, Johan Vellekoop7, Axel Wittmann30, Long Xiao31, Kosei E Yamaguchi32,33, William Zylberman34.   

Abstract

The Cretaceous/Palaeogene mass extinction eradicated 76% of species on Earth1,2. It was caused by the impact of an asteroid3,4 on the Yucatán carbonate platform in the southern Gulf of Mexico 66 million years ago 5 , forming the Chicxulub impact crater6,7. After the mass extinction, the recovery of the global marine ecosystem-measured as primary productivity-was geographically heterogeneous 8 ; export production in the Gulf of Mexico and North Atlantic-western Tethys was slower than in most other regions8-11, taking 300 thousand years (kyr) to return to levels similar to those of the Late Cretaceous period. Delayed recovery of marine productivity closer to the crater implies an impact-related environmental control, such as toxic metal poisoning 12 , on recovery times. If no such geographic pattern exists, the best explanation for the observed heterogeneity is a combination of ecological factors-trophic interactions 13 , species incumbency and competitive exclusion by opportunists 14 -and 'chance'8,15,16. The question of whether the post-impact recovery of marine productivity was delayed closer to the crater has a bearing on the predictability of future patterns of recovery in anthropogenically perturbed ecosystems. If there is a relationship between the distance from the impact and the recovery of marine productivity, we would expect recovery rates to be slowest in the crater itself. Here we present a record of foraminifera, calcareous nannoplankton, trace fossils and elemental abundance data from within the Chicxulub crater, dated to approximately the first 200 kyr of the Palaeocene. We show that life reappeared in the basin just years after the impact and a high-productivity ecosystem was established within 30 kyr, which indicates that proximity to the impact did not delay recovery and that there was therefore no impact-related environmental control on recovery. Ecological processes probably controlled the recovery of productivity after the Cretaceous/Palaeogene mass extinction and are therefore likely to be important for the response of the ocean ecosystem to other rapid extinction events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29849143      PMCID: PMC6058194          DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0163-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


The recent joint Expedition 364 of the International Ocean Discovery Program and International Continental Drilling Program recovered the first record of the few hundred thousand years immediately after the impact within the Chicxulub Crater. Site M0077, drilled into the crater’s peak ring[7] (Extended Data Fig. 1), sampled a ~130 m thick generally upward-fining suevite (i.e., melt-bearing impact breccia) overlying impact melt rocks and fractured granite[17]. The boundary between the suevite and overlying earliest Paleocene pelagic limestone is in Core 40-1 (Fig. 1), and is comprised of a 76 cm upward-fining, brown, fine-grained, micritic limestone that we term the transitional unit. The lower portion of the transitional unit is laminated below 54 cm core depth and contains no trace fossils (Fig. 1, Extended Data Fig. 2). The laminations are thin graded beds with sub-mm scale cross bedding that indicate bottom currents and are likely due to the movement of wave energy, including tsunami and/or seiches, in the days after the impact. The fine grain size (primarily clay to silt, with some sand-sized grains concentrated in the graded beds) suggests that much of the material in the transitional unit was deposited from resuspension and settling. The transitional unit is overlain by a white pelagic limestone. The lowermost sample taken in this limestone (34 cm) contains the planktic foraminifer Parvularugolobigerina eugubina, which marks the base of Zone Pα, as well as P. extensa, P. alabamensis, and Guembelitria cretacea. Because many other species that originate within Zone Pα first appear a few cm higher in the section (31–32 cm), we conclude that the base of the limestone lies very near the base of this zone, 30 kyr post-impact[18].
Extended Data Figure 1

Location of Site M0077 in the Chicxulub Crater as seen on gravity data

Black dots are cenotes. Modified from Gulick et al.[21].

Fig. 1

Paleoproductivity indicators in the earliest Paleocene at Site M0077

The shaded area is the transitional unit and the dashed line represents the contact with the overlying pelagic limestone. Top to bottom: XRF-derived calcium abundance in counts per second (cps); Ba/Ti and Ba/Fe ratios; %abundances key planktic foraminiferal groups, including %Guembelitria, %survivors (i.e., Cretaceous species known to survive the impact), and % Danian taxa (i.e., species which evolved after the impact), as percentage of total foraminifera; foraminifera per gram of sediment, plotted on a log scale; %Micula smaller than 2µm (against total nannoplankton) and nannoplankton abundance (total occurrences per field of view – FOV); %benthic foraminifera (against total foraminifera); Core image of 364-M0077A-40R-1 0–110 cm Core 40R-1, 34 to 110 cm (616.58 to 617.33 meters below seafloor) with discrete trace fossils highlighted by arrows (see Extended Data Fig. 2 for larger version of this image).

Extended Data Figure 2

Trace fossils in Core 40 Section 1 of IODP Hole M0077A

Discrete burrows in the upper transitional unit and the lower limestone are circled and labelled by the genus. Above the base of the limestone, trace fossils are abundant; representative examples are highlighted in the lower 10 cm of this interval. Ch: Chondrites; Pl: Planolites; Pa: Paleophycus.

Biostratigraphy and basic assumptions about depositional and crater processes indicate that the transitional unit was deposited between several years and 30 kyr after impact (Fig. 2). To better constrain this, we utilize the abundance of extraterrestrial 3He to determine sediment accumulation rates (see Methods). This proxy provides a firm upper limit of 8 kyr for deposition, assuming none of the 3He is reworked. If even a small amount of 3He is reworked (very likely, given the prevalence of reworked microfossils and impact debris), then the transitional unit was deposited in a period of time below the resolution of the method, < ~1 kyr. With no sediment source other than settling of material suspended by the impact and subsequent tsunami and seiches, a more realistic estimate for the duration of this unit is based on Stoke’s law, which suggests ~6 years for the settling of a 2 µm grain of carbonate (an upper limit, as most grains are much larger; see SI for further discussion). The lower portion of the overlying limestone, which contains fossils which appear ~30 kyr post impact, appears conformable with the transitional unit and must therefore be condensed due to low pelagic sedimentation in the first few 10s of kyrs post impact.
Figure 2

Constraints on the age of the transitional unit

Clear, discrete trace fossils, including Planolites and Chondrites, characterize the upper 20 cm of the transitional unit (above 54 cm) (Fig. 1, Extended Data Fig. 2), providing unequivocal evidence for benthic life in the crater within years of the impact. Flattening of the structures indicates that the traces were formed while the sediment was still soft, during or shortly after deposition of the transitional unit. Infilling of the burrows with brown, fine-grained micrite also suggests traces were syndepositional and not derived from mixing of the Danian limestone above the transitional unit. Trace fossils produced during deposition of the limestone, as indicated by light infilling material, are distinct and only occur in the uppermost few cm of the transitional unit (Extended Data Fig. 2). The transitional unit microfossils are dominated by clearly reworked Maastrichtian foraminifera and nannoplankton, known across the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean as the K-Pg Boundary Cocktail[19] (Extended Data Fig. 3, Table S1). Although overall foraminiferal abundance (plotted as foraminifera per gram of sedimentary rock; Fig. 1) is high at the base of the unit, species known to range across the boundary (“survivor species”) are rare in the lower transitional unit and become more common upsection even as total foraminifera decline (Fig. 1). Survivors, here defined as Guembelitria cretacea, Muricohedbergella monmouthensis, and M. holmdelensis[20], dominate a depauperate assemblage in the upper 20 cm of the transitional unit, coinciding with the first appearance of trace fossils (Extended Data Figs. 4 and 5).
Extended Data Figure 3

Reworked Cretaceous foraminifera in the transitional unit

A Globigerinelloides sp., 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 55–56 cm; B Heterohelix sp. 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 104–105 cm; C clast of pelagic limestone containing older Cretaceous planktic foraminifera 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 106–110 cm; D Praegublerina pseudotessera 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129cm ; E Racemiguembelina powelli 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm; F Globotruncana bulloides 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 110–118 cm; G Globotruncanita stuartiformis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm; H Globotruncanita elevata 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm. Scale bars are all 100 µm.

Extended Data Figure 4

Scanning electron micrographs of planktic foraminifera from Core 40

A–B, examples of common reworked Cretaceous biserials, 364-M0077A-40R-1 102–103 cm; C Muricohedbergella monmouthensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 102–103 cm; D Muricohedbergella holmdelensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 44–45 cm; E Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 44–45; F Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; G Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; H Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; I Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; J Globoconusa daubjergensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; K Eoglobigerina eobulloides 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; L Eoglobigerina edita 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; M Praemurica taurica 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 10–11 cm; N Chiloguembelina morsei 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 10–11 cm.

Extended Data Figure 5

Small and regular sized nannofossils in the transitional unit

All photographs from Core 364-M0077-40R-1-W. Plates 1–11, small Micula spp. 1. 55–56 cm; 2. 41–42 cm; 3. 95–96 cm; 4. 41–42 cm; 5. 90–91 cm; 6. 94–95 cm; 7. 91–92 cm; 8. 91–92 cm; 9. 45–46 cm; 10. 100–101 cm; 11. 81–82 cm. Plates12–17 Regular-sized Micula spp. 12. 44–45 cm; 13. 41–42 cm; 14. 51–52 cm; 15. 105–106 cm; 16. 97–98 cm; 17. 36–37 cm. Plates 19–20 Regular-sized Retecapsa spp. 19. 85–86 cm; 20. 100–101 cm. 18, 21, 22 Small Retecapsa spp. 21. 71–72 cm, 22. 100–101 cm, 18. 100–101 cm. Scale bar is 2 µm.

The nannofossil assemblage in the transitional unit contains reworked Cretaceous specimens, including a group of clearly overgrown species that became extinct near the Campanian-Maastrichtian boundary, such as Aspidolithus parcus and Eiffellithus eximius. The remainder of the Cretaceous species, which dominate the assemblage, range to the top of or beyond the latest Maastrichtian (Table S2). Unusually small (<2 µm) and delicate specimens of Micula are observed throughout the transitional unit and increase in abundance upsection (Fig. 1), along with small Retecapsa (Extended Data Fig. 6). Taxa common at other sites in the earliest Danian are also present, including disaster genera like Thoracosphaera and Braarudosphaera. Unlike the foraminifera, there are no clear stratigraphic trends in overall nannoplankton abundance (Fig. 1).
Extended Data Figure 6

Relative abundance of major Maastrichtian calcareous nannoplankton

Small blue squares are Maastrichtian sites from the global compilation[12]; larger red squares are from the transitional unit at Site M0077. These data demonstrate the unusual abundance of Watznaueria and Retecapsa at our site.

Because survivor species lived both before and after the K-Pg mass extinction, it is impossible to determine for certain if individual specimens in the transitional unit colonized the crater post-impact. However, the populations of foraminifera and nannoplankton are significantly different from those of the latest Cretaceous[12] (i.e., the expected population if the whole assemblage was reworked), suggesting that these taxa were true survivors (Fig. 1, Extended Data Fig. 6). Guembelitria cretacea, a common component of the survivor assemblage in the upper transitional unit, was restricted to marginal marine waters during the Maastrichtian and would not have been present at the pre-impact site, which was >100 m deep[21] and >500 km from shore[22]. The nannofossil assemblage in the transitional unit is significantly different from typical latest Maastrichtian assemblages, with some genera over-represented (Watznaueria and Retecapsa) and others under-represented (Eiffellithus, not including E. eximius, Arkhangelskiella, Chiastozygus, and Prediscosphaera) (Extended Data Fig. 6). Additionally, Micula, a robust taxon often used as a proxy for dissolution, is not as abundant as elsewhere, indicating that these unusual abundances are not due to poor or selective preservation (Extended Data Fig. 6). This initial appearance of life is remarkably fast, especially because crater-specific factors do not seem to have had a negative impact on the local recovery of life. A vigorous, high-temperature hydrothermal system was established within the crater and may have persisted for millions of years after the impact[23], especially across the peak ring where rocks exhumed from deep in the crust were extensively fractured[7]. Nevertheless, the appearance of burrowing organisms within years of the impact indicates that the hydrothermal system did not adversely affect seafloor life. Impact-generated hydrothermal systems are hypothesized to be potential habitats for early life on Earth[24] and on other planets, particularly below the surface. However, for marine impact craters in open ocean communication, like Chicxulub (Extended Data Fig. 1), our data indicate that locally significant but still comparatively small volumes of hydrothermal fluids were overwhelmed by the 1.3×104 km3 of well-mixed ocean water that filled the basin. Likewise, the open connection with the Gulf of Mexico prevented the development of anoxia in the crater. Our analyses of iodine to calcium ratios suggest that local dissolved oxygen was high and stable in Zone Pα (Fig. 3). This is in contrast to the smaller (85-km wide) Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact crater in Virginia, USA, where anoxia due to restriction is attributed as the cause of delayed recovery of the benthic ecosystem on the crater floor[25]. This comparison suggests that the establishment of life within marine impact craters is controlled more by circulation (and thus crater geometry) than by the magnitude of the impact or global environmental effects.
Figure 3

Early Danian foraminifer abundances and I/(Ca+Mg) oxygenation proxy

Left: Key Danian planktic foraminifera. Normal perforate planktics (Eoglobigerina, Globanomalina, Parasubbotina, and Praemurica) are rare throughout the study interval and not plotted here; all are plotted as % total planktic foraminifera. Right: I/(Ca+Mg) redox proxy, indicating well-oxygenated conditions in the Chicxulub crater through this interval.

The overlying pelagic limestone, which was deposited within Zone Pα (30–200 kyr post impact) contains abundant evidence of high productivity in a thriving ecosystem. The planktic foraminifer assemblage in Zone Pα is diverse and abundant (Fig. 3). Good preservation in the lowermost sample (34 cm) allowed the identification of over 60 species of benthic foraminifera, and benthics make up 12% of the assemblage at this level (Table S1). This percentage of benthics[26] and the overall benthic assemblage[27] are both typical of an upper to middle bathyal paleo water depth (~600–700 m)[10,27]. At this level, trace fossils increase in size, abundance, and diversity. The abundance and diversity of benthic organisms indicate that by ~30 kyr after the impact, seafloor conditions had returned to normal and sufficient organic matter flux existed to sustain a diverse, multilayer benthic community. Conversely, the nannoplankton assemblage in the Danian limestone is dominated by Braarudosphaera and calcareous dinoflagellate cysts (e.g., Thoracosphaera), common disaster taxa in the early recovery interval. Large, foraminifer-sized calcispheres appear after ~100 kyr. Calcareous phytoplankton in the earliest Danian clearly represent a low-diversity, high-productivity bloom. Genera like Neobiscutum and Prinsius, common bloom taxa in the recovery interval at other Northern Hemisphere sites, do not become common until several meters higher in the section, >1 myr after the impact. Organic microfossils are completely absent from the study interval, likely due to poor preservation of organic material. Geochemical paleoproductivity proxies, particularly Ba/Ti and Ba/Fe ratios, also indicate high productivity in the post-impact Danian limestone (Fig. 1). Ba/Ti ratios of ~1.0 at the base of the limestone (~30 kyr post impact) and ~2.0 above that (15 cm higher or ~100 kyr post impact) indicate relatively high and increasing productivity in the Chicxulub Basin in the earliest Danian. The recovery of productivity in the crater is faster than at many sites, including those in the Gulf of Mexico, some of which took 300 kyr or more to recover to a similar extent[8,11]. Therefore, we find that proximity to the impact was not a control on recovery in marine ecosystems. The wide range of rates of recovery in the oceans show no relationship with geographic distance to the crater and so are best explained by natural ecological interactions between organisms within recovery ecosystems like incumbency and competitive exclusion[8,14]. These trends can be used to understand the rates of recovery after other major extinction events and, critically, predict the long-term recovery of modern ecosystems affected by pollution and climate change.

Methods

IODP-ICDP Expedition 364 drilled the peak ring of the Chicxulub crater in the spring of 2016 (Extended Data Fig. 1). Samples were taken at the Bremen IODP Core Repository during the Exp. 364 sampling party. Core depth in centimeters, with zero at the top of the section (616.24 m below sea floor), are reported throughout. Core material was indurated, and ~0.5 cm quarter-rounds were cut out with a rock saw. Due to the need to reserve core material for rare earth element geochemistry (which will be presented in a separate manuscript), the lowermost ~1.5 cm of the Danian limestone was not sampled. Individual samples were subdivided for foraminifer, calcareous nannoplankton, and discrete geochemical analyses. Forty-three samples were examined for planktic and benthic foraminifera from Core 40 from 0–110 cm depth. Samples were weighed, crushed with a mortar and pestle, soaked overnight (or longer) in a 10% solution of hydrogen peroxide buffered with borax, and washed over a 43 µm sieve to ensure capture of small Danian taxa. The sieve was soaked in methylene blue dye between samples to identify contaminated specimens. Samples were then dried in an oven, split to obtain a manageable volume of material, and examined for foraminifera, calcispheres, and other sand-sized particles. In the Danian limestone, at least 300 specimens were counted to establish a statistically robust population[28] and the rest of the residue was then examined for biostratigraphically significant taxa. Low abundances in the transitional unit precluded 300 specimen counts. However, we demonstrate that our values are sufficient to reject the null hypothesis (that the observed enrichments in survivor taxa are the result of random noise) with binomial confidence limits. This calculation traditionally provides the basis for the 300-specimen “rule:” counting 300 specimens provides statistical confidence at a 95% confidence interval that a species that makes up 1% of the population is represented in the count[28]. As we show, fewer specimens are sufficient to demonstrate the presence of a survivor population in our samples. Binomial confidence limits for samples with fewer than 300 specimens are reported in Table S1. Additionally, a single unusually well-preserved sample at the base of the post-impact limestone was examined for rare benthic species to determine the true diversity of benthics at the base of the unit (Table S1). Planktic foraminifer biozonation follows the P Zones of Berggren and Pearson[29] as modified by Wade et al.[18]. Ninety-seven samples were examined for nannofossils. Samples were disaggregated in water and smear slides were made from the supernatant. Slides were observed in a transmitted light microscope at 1600× until at least 100 specimens were observed (Table S2). Standard taxonomy was applied (http://www.mikrotax.org/Nannotax3/index.php?dir=Coccolithophores). The abundance of taxa at Site M0077 was compared to the global K-Pg nannoplankton compilation of Jiang et al.[12]. Ichnological analysis was conducted from 0–110 cm. Ichnological observations were conducted on core material and a detailed and continuous analysis of digital images. To improve visibility of ichnological features, images were treated by a digital image methodology, based on modification of image adjustments as levels, brightness and vibrance[30,31]. Ichnotaxonomical classification of trace fossils was based on the overall shape and the presence of diagnostic criteria such as size and presence of branches[32]. Special attention was given to the infilling material of biogenic structures. The measurement of I/(Ca+Mg) was carried out using a procedure similar to that described by Lu et al.[33]. For each sample and geostandard approximately 3–4 mg of carbonate powder was weighed out, dissolved in ~0.45M nitric solution, and then diluted using 0.1M nitric acid and 0.5% TMAH solution. All reported measurements are with samples that had a matrix of 50 ± 5 ppm Ca solution to ensure the most precise iodine measurement. Dissolved samples had TMAH solution added within an hour to avoid any possible loss of volatilized iodine[33]. Samples were measured using an Agilent inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer 7500cs housed within the geochemistry group of the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory at Florida State University. A previously reported known sample, Key Largo (KL 1-1) was used to ensure reliable reproducibility. Our value of 5.51 µmol/mol was within error of the reported value of 5.55 µmol/mol (46). Hardisty et al.[34] found that a generally low oxygen conditions correspond to ~2.6 µmol/mol for I/(Ca+Mg). Values are reported in Table S3. Section 1 of Core 40 was scanned with an AVAATECH XRF Core Scanner II at MARUM, Bremen, Germany during the onshore phase of Expedition 364 (Fig. 1). The split core was covered with a 4 µm thick SPEX CertiPrep Ultralene foil to avoid contamination. XRF data was acquired with a Canberra X-PIPS silicon drift detector with 1550 eV resolution, a Canberra DAS 1000 digital spectrum analyzer, and an Oxford Instruments 50W XTF011 X-ray tube with rhodium target material. X-ray spectra were processed with WIN AXIL software from Canberra Erisys at a resolution of 12 mm and a step of 10 mm. Scans were conducted at different voltages to determine a range of element concentrations: 50 kV, with a beam current of 1 mA (Ba and Sr; average dead time of 5%), and 10 kV with a beam current of 0.15 mA (Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, Fe, Mn, and S; average dead time of 11%). For each scan, sampling time was 20 seconds per spot. 3He is delivered to the Earth's surface by cosmic dust grains and over short time spans (~ Myr) can be used as a constant flux proxy[35]. Previous work has shown that the K-Pg impactor was not associated with enhanced 3He flux, and the mean extraterrestrial 3He flux from cosmic dust accretion at the end of the Cretaceous (106 ×10−15 cc STP/g/cm2/kyr) was used to estimate the duration over which the K-Pg boundary clay was deposited at Gubbio and El Kef[36]. We use a similar approach here to establish the sedimentation rate of the transitional unit, which we use to develop an age model. Helium isotope ratios and concentrations were measured on ~1g aliquots of sediment following standard analytical procedures[31]. Extraterrestrial 3He concentrations were computed from measured He isotopic compositions using an isotopic deconvolution model[36]. Results are shown in Extended Data Table 1. 3He concentrations and 3He/4He ratios are generally low compared to typical marine sediments of similar age[37,38]. Nevertheless, with the exception of the lowest sample in the transitional unit (106.5 cm), the fraction of 3He attributable to an extraterrestrial source is high, ranging from ~0.70 to 0.96. The deepest sample has a similar 3He concentration to other samples in the transitional unit, but ~5 times more 4He. This elevated 4He likely arises from a higher concentration of terrigenous 4He-bearing material deposited rapidly after the impact.
Extended Data Table 1

3He data.

Samplestartcmstopcm3Hepcc/g4Hencc/gAbsolute3He/4HeFraction3He ETMaximum 3He -BasedModel Age (kyr)
KT3939400.006813.65.04E-070.966.0
KT4848490.005535.41.56E-070.874.9
KT5959600.006423.12.78E-070.924.0
KT6868690.004231.61.33E-070.842.9
KT7979800.003618.31.99E-070.91.9
KT8989900.010534.73.04E-070.930.9
KT99991000.004564.36.99E-080.700.1
KT106.51071080.01093273.32E-080.370.0
We see no evidence for extraterrestrial He carried in impactor fragments, such as highly elevated and/or highly variable 3He and 3He/4He ratios. The absence of such a signal is consistent with either a) the absence of impactor fragments in the material analyzed, or b) loss of extraterrestrial 3He from the impactor via heating, vaporization or fusion. Note that, unlike many tracers of the impactor (such as Ir), deposition of fused or vaporized impactor will leave no trace in the sedimentary record because once He is lost into the atmosphere, it can no longer be retained in sediments.

Location of Site M0077 in the Chicxulub Crater as seen on gravity data

Black dots are cenotes. Modified from Gulick et al.[21].

Trace fossils in Core 40 Section 1 of IODP Hole M0077A

Discrete burrows in the upper transitional unit and the lower limestone are circled and labelled by the genus. Above the base of the limestone, trace fossils are abundant; representative examples are highlighted in the lower 10 cm of this interval. Ch: Chondrites; Pl: Planolites; Pa: Paleophycus.

Reworked Cretaceous foraminifera in the transitional unit

A Globigerinelloides sp., 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 55–56 cm; B Heterohelix sp. 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 104–105 cm; C clast of pelagic limestone containing older Cretaceous planktic foraminifera 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 106–110 cm; D Praegublerina pseudotessera 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129cm ; E Racemiguembelina powelli 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm; F Globotruncana bulloides 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 110–118 cm; G Globotruncanita stuartiformis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm; H Globotruncanita elevata 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 118–129 cm. Scale bars are all 100 µm.

Scanning electron micrographs of planktic foraminifera from Core 40

A–B, examples of common reworked Cretaceous biserials, 364-M0077A-40R-1 102–103 cm; C Muricohedbergella monmouthensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 102–103 cm; D Muricohedbergella holmdelensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 44–45 cm; E Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 44–45; F Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; G Guembelitria cretacea 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; H Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; I Parvularugoglobigerina eugubina 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; J Globoconusa daubjergensis 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 31–32 cm; K Eoglobigerina eobulloides 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; L Eoglobigerina edita 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 29–30 cm; M Praemurica taurica 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 10–11 cm; N Chiloguembelina morsei 364-M0077A-40R-1-W 10–11 cm.

Small and regular sized nannofossils in the transitional unit

All photographs from Core 364-M0077-40R-1-W. Plates 1–11, small Micula spp. 1. 55–56 cm; 2. 41–42 cm; 3. 95–96 cm; 4. 41–42 cm; 5. 90–91 cm; 6. 94–95 cm; 7. 91–92 cm; 8. 91–92 cm; 9. 45–46 cm; 10. 100–101 cm; 11. 81–82 cm. Plates12–17 Regular-sized Micula spp. 12. 44–45 cm; 13. 41–42 cm; 14. 51–52 cm; 15. 105–106 cm; 16. 97–98 cm; 17. 36–37 cm. Plates 19–20 Regular-sized Retecapsa spp. 19. 85–86 cm; 20. 100–101 cm. 18, 21, 22 Small Retecapsa spp. 21. 71–72 cm, 22. 100–101 cm, 18. 100–101 cm. Scale bar is 2 µm.

Relative abundance of major Maastrichtian calcareous nannoplankton

Small blue squares are Maastrichtian sites from the global compilation[12]; larger red squares are from the transitional unit at Site M0077. These data demonstrate the unusual abundance of Watznaueria and Retecapsa at our site. 3He data.
  8 in total

1.  A short duration of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event: evidence from extraterrestrial helium-3.

Authors:  S Mukhopadhyay; K A Farley; A Montanari
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Recovery after mass extinction: evolutionary assembly in large-scale biosphere dynamics.

Authors:  Ricard V Solé; José M Montoya; Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The origin and emergence of life under impact bombardment.

Authors:  Charles S Cockell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Selective press extinctions, but not random pulse extinctions, cause delayed ecological recovery in communities of digital organisms.

Authors:  Gabriel Yedid; Charles A Ofria; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Extraterrestrial cause for the cretaceous-tertiary extinction.

Authors:  L W Alvarez; W Alvarez; F Asaro; H V Michel
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.

Authors:  Peter Schulte; Laia Alegret; Ignacio Arenillas; José A Arz; Penny J Barton; Paul R Bown; Timothy J Bralower; Gail L Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Charles S Cockell; Gareth S Collins; Alexander Deutsch; Tamara J Goldin; Kazuhisa Goto; José M Grajales-Nishimura; Richard A F Grieve; Sean P S Gulick; Kirk R Johnson; Wolfgang Kiessling; Christian Koeberl; David A Kring; Kenneth G MacLeod; Takafumi Matsui; Jay Melosh; Alessandro Montanari; Joanna V Morgan; Clive R Neal; Douglas J Nichols; Richard D Norris; Elisabetta Pierazzo; Greg Ravizza; Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra; Wolf Uwe Reimold; Eric Robin; Tobias Salge; Robert P Speijer; Arthur R Sweet; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi; Vivi Vajda; Michael T Whalen; Pi S Willumsen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The formation of peak rings in large impact craters.

Authors:  Joanna V Morgan; Sean P S Gulick; Timothy Bralower; Elise Chenot; Gail Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Charles Cockell; Gareth S Collins; Marco J L Coolen; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; Heather Jones; David A Kring; Erwan Le Ber; Johanna Lofi; Xiao Long; Christopher Lowery; Claire Mellett; Rubén Ocampo-Torres; Gordon R Osinski; Ligia Perez-Cruz; Annemarie Pickersgill; Michael Poelchau; Auriol Rae; Cornelia Rasmussen; Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra; Ulrich Riller; Honami Sato; Douglas R Schmitt; Jan Smit; Sonia Tikoo; Naotaka Tomioka; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi; Michael Whalen; Axel Wittmann; Kosei E Yamaguchi; William Zylberman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Time scales of critical events around the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.

Authors:  Paul R Renne; Alan L Deino; Frederik J Hilgen; Klaudia F Kuiper; Darren F Mark; William S Mitchell; Leah E Morgan; Roland Mundil; Jan Smit
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Earth's Impact Events Through Geologic Time: A List of Recommended Ages for Terrestrial Impact Structures and Deposits.

Authors:  Martin Schmieder; David A Kring
Journal:  Astrobiology       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Life before impact in the Chicxulub area: unique marine ichnological signatures preserved in crater suevite.

Authors:  Francisco J Rodríguez-Tovar; Pim Kaskes; Jens Ormö; Sean P S Gulick; Michael T Whalen; Heather L Jones; Christopher M Lowery; Timothy J Bralower; Jan Smit; David T King; Steven Goderis; Philippe Claeys
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The first day of the Cenozoic.

Authors:  Sean P S Gulick; Timothy J Bralower; Jens Ormö; Brendon Hall; Kliti Grice; Bettina Schaefer; Shelby Lyons; Katherine H Freeman; Joanna V Morgan; Natalia Artemieva; Pim Kaskes; Sietze J de Graaff; Michael T Whalen; Gareth S Collins; Sonia M Tikoo; Christina Verhagen; Gail L Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Marco J L Coolen; Steven Goderis; Kazuhisa Goto; Richard A F Grieve; Naoma McCall; Gordon R Osinski; Auriol S P Rae; Ulrich Riller; Jan Smit; Vivi Vajda; Axel Wittmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ecosystem function after the K/Pg extinction: decoupling of marine carbon pump and diversity.

Authors:  Heather Birch; Daniela N Schmidt; Helen K Coxall; Dick Kroon; Andy Ridgwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction.

Authors:  Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza; Alexander Farnsworth; Philip D Mannion; Daniel J Lunt; Paul J Valdes; Joanna V Morgan; Peter A Allison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction.

Authors:  Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza; Philip D Mannion; Daniel J Lunt; Alex Farnsworth; Lewis A Jones; Sarah-Jane Kelland; Peter A Allison
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Probing the hydrothermal system of the Chicxulub impact crater.

Authors:  David A Kring; Sonia M Tikoo; Martin Schmieder; Ulrich Riller; Mario Rebolledo-Vieyra; Sarah L Simpson; Gordon R Osinski; Jérôme Gattacceca; Axel Wittmann; Christina M Verhagen; Charles S Cockell; Marco J L Coolen; Fred J Longstaffe; Sean P S Gulick; Joanna V Morgan; Timothy J Bralower; Elise Chenot; Gail L Christeson; Philippe Claeys; Ludovic Ferrière; Catalina Gebhardt; Kazuhisa Goto; Sophie L Green; Heather Jones; Johanna Lofi; Christopher M Lowery; Rubén Ocampo-Torres; Ligia Perez-Cruz; Annemarie E Pickersgill; Michael H Poelchau; Auriol S P Rae; Cornelia Rasmussen; Honami Sato; Jan Smit; Naotaka Tomioka; Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi; Michael T Whalen; Long Xiao; Kosei E Yamaguchi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Shaping of the Present-Day Deep Biosphere at Chicxulub by the Impact Catastrophe That Ended the Cretaceous.

Authors:  Charles S Cockell; Bettina Schaefer; Cornelia Wuchter; Marco J L Coolen; Kliti Grice; Luzie Schnieders; Joanna V Morgan; Sean P S Gulick; Axel Wittmann; Johanna Lofi; Gail L Christeson; David A Kring; Michael T Whalen; Timothy J Bralower; Gordon R Osinski; Philippe Claeys; Pim Kaskes; Sietze J de Graaff; Thomas Déhais; Steven Goderis; Natali Hernandez Becerra; Sophie Nixon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Schizasterid Heart Urchins Host Microorganisms in a Digestive Symbiosis of Mesozoic Origin.

Authors:  Alexander Ziegler; Ariel M Gilligan; Jesse G Dillon; Bruno Pernet
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  Plant extinction excels plant speciation in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Gao; Hui Liu; Ning Wang; Jing Yang; Xiao-Ling Zhang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.