| Literature DB >> 29849028 |
R Saint1,2, W Evans1,2, Y Zhou1, T Barrett1,2, T M Fromhold1, E Saleh3, I Maskery3, C Tuck3, R Wildman3, F Oručević1,2, P Krüger4,5.
Abstract
Recent advances in the preparation, control and measurement of atomic gases have led to new insights into the quantum world and unprecedented metrological sensitivities, e.g. in measuring gravitational forces and magnetic fields. The full potential of applying such capabilities to areas as diverse as biomedical imaging, non-invasive underground mapping, and GPS-free navigation can only be realised with the scalable production of efficient, robust and portable devices. We introduce additive manufacturing as a production technique of quantum device components with unrivalled design freedom and rapid prototyping. This provides a step change in efficiency, compactness and facilitates systems integration. As a demonstrator we present an ultrahigh vacuum compatible ultracold atom source dissipating less than ten milliwatts of electrical power during field generation to produce large samples of cold rubidium gases. This disruptive technology opens the door to drastically improved integrated structures, which will further reduce size and assembly complexity in scalable series manufacture of bespoke portable quantum devices.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29849028 PMCID: PMC5976634 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26455-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic of the cylinder atom-trap current flow. (b) 3D-printed atom trap structure. (c) Digital render of the cylinder structure shown with vacuum feedthroughs and laser beams.
Figure 2Typical surface pattern images from an optical microscope. (a) Untreated structure showing the material immediately after manufacture; the darker grey regions separated by lighter channels are melt pools formed during selective laser melting (SLM). (b) Images following solution heat treatment showing the more uniform distribution of silicon pools in dark grey. The scale bar depicts 50 μm.
Figure 3Plot of the calculated (finite-element) versus measured magnetic field magnitude along each axial direction. Dotted lines here show ideal 2:−1:−1 ratio between strong and weak axes. Along all three optical axes, the linear field region extends over the full cylinder aperture, ensuring optimal laser cooling.
Figure 4Maximum atom number as a function of cylinder electrical power dissipation (current) for three beam diameters. The current range 4 A to 50 A corresponds to the magnetic field gradient range 3.2 G/cm to 40 G/cm.
Figure 5Left: Optical density images of a cloud of atoms in three cooling regimes. Each single shot measurement is taken after 12 ms time of flight. Right: Vertically integrated optical densities (blue) with superimposed Gaussian fits (red). (a) A typical MOT cloud, (b) a MOT cloud after Gray MOT cooling (see text), (c) a MOT cloud after molasses cooling. The Gaussian width σ is indicative of the cloud temperature.