| Literature DB >> 29848967 |
Jaroslav Hornak1, Pavel Trnka2, Petr Kadlec3, Ondřej Michal4, Václav Mentlík5, Pavol Šutta6, Gergely Márk Csányi7, Zoltán Ádám Tamus8.
Abstract
Composite insulation materials are an inseparable part of numerous electrical devices because of synergy effect between their individual parts. One of the main aims of the presented study is an introduction of the dielectric properties of nanoscale magnesium oxide powder via Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy (BDS). These unique results present the behavior of relative permittivity and loss factor in frequency and temperature range. Following the current trends in the application of inorganic nanofillers, this article is complemented by the study of dielectric properties (dielectric strength, volume resistivity, dissipation factor and relative permittivity) of epoxy-based composites depending on the filler amount (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1 and 1.25 weight percent). These parameters are the most important for the design and development of the insulation systems. The X-ray diffraction patterns are presented for pure resin and resin with optimal filler amount (1 wt %), which was estimated according to measurement results. Magnesium oxide nanoparticles were also treated by addition of silane coupling agent ( γ -Glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane), in the case of optimal filler loading (1 wt %) as well. Besides previously mentioned parameters, the effects of surface functionalization have been observed by two unique measurement and evaluation techniques which have never been used for this evaluation, i.e., reduced resorption curves (RRCs) and voltage response method (VR). These methods (developed in our departments), extend the possibilities of measurement of composite dielectric responses related to DC voltage application, allow the facile comparability of different materials and could be used for dispersion level evaluation. This fact has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction analyses.Entities:
Keywords: broadband dielectric spectroscopy; dielectric strength; loss factor; magnesium oxide; nanocomposite; relative permittivity; surface functionalization; voltage response
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848967 PMCID: PMC6027305 DOI: 10.3390/nano8060381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Structure of magnesium oxide crystal (Redrawn and adapted from [2]).
Figure 23D interpretation of frequency-temperature dependencies of (a) dielectric constant and (b) loss factor for heating (red scale) and cooling (blue scale) of MgO pellet.
Selected values of dielectric constant and loss factor for the industrial frequency of 50 Hz.
| 25 | 7.77 (5.80) | 1.55 (0.205) |
| 50 | 8.43 (5.67) | 2.68 (0.0801) |
| 75 | 9.56 (5.57) | 4.90 (0.0390) |
| 100 | 8.65 (5.51) | 3.86 (0.0220) |
| 125 | 7.25 (5.46) | 1.90 (0.0145) |
Numbers before brackets are values for heating and in brackets are values for cooling.
Figure 3Structure of resin based on on Bisphenol-A diglycidyl ether.
Figure 4Changes of dielectric properties depending on the filler amount. (a) dissipation factor—500 V AC, 50 Hz; (b) relative permittivity—500 V AC, 50 Hz; (c) Volume resistivity—500 V DC; (d) Dielectric strength—increase 1.5 kV/s AC.
Figure 5X-ray diffraction pattern of investigated materials.
Silane coupling agents characterizations [65,66,67].
| Coupling Agent | Linear Formula |
|---|---|
| Trichlorovinylsilane | H2C=CHSiCl3 |
| Triethoxyvinylsilane | H2C=CHSi(OC2H5)3 |
| C9H20O5Si | |
| H2N(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 | |
| C14H28O4Si | |
| HS(CH2)3Si(OCH3)3 |
Figure 6Simplified illustration of reaction of -Glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane with magnesium oxide surface (Redrawn and adepted from: [71,72,73]).
Comparison of selected parameters after surface treatment.
| Sample | Dissipation Factor | Relative Permittivity | Volume Resistivity | Dielectric Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure resin | 0.0033 | 2.95 | 6.28 × 1012 | 37 kV/mm |
| Resin + MgO | 0.0041 | 3.43 | 5.01 × 1013 | 42.3 kV/mm |
| Resin + MgO + GLYMO | 0.0036 | 3.15 | 7.14 × 1014 | 43.1 kV/mm |
Figure 7Transformation of resorption current to RRCs.
Figure 8Reduced resorption curves for individual sample sets.
Figure 9Timing diagram of Voltage Response measurement.
Results of voltage response measurement.
| Sample | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pure resin | 5.26 | 27.69 |
| Resin + MgO | 3.20 | 16.48 |
| Resin + MgO + GLYMO | 2.25 | 15.33 |
Figure 10X-ray diagram of treated and untreated MgO nanoparticles.