BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, it has not been well characterized whether sunitinib is effective in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of age on clinical outcomes of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy and safety of first-line sunitinib in 154 consecutive mRCC patients were retrospectively compared between patients aged <75 (n=125) and ≥75 (n=29) years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the major clinicopathological characteristics between younger and older patients; however, the reduction of the initial dose of sunitinib was significantly more frequent in older than younger patients. No significant difference in response rate, clinical benefit rate or proportion of patients going on to receive second-line therapy was noted between these two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups, and no significant impact of age on PFS or OS was documented by the Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Of several adverse events, only anemia and fatigue were significantly more frequently observed in older than younger patients. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of dose reduction or discontinuation of sunitinib between the two groups, the interruption of sunitinib was more frequently required in older than younger patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that advanced age alone should not be regarded as a contraindication to the introduction of sunitinib as first-line systemic therapy for mRCC patients. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: To date, it has not been well characterized whether sunitinib is effective in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of age on clinical outcomes of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy and safety of first-line sunitinib in 154 consecutive mRCC patients were retrospectively compared between patients aged <75 (n=125) and ≥75 (n=29) years. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the major clinicopathological characteristics between younger and older patients; however, the reduction of the initial dose of sunitinib was significantly more frequent in older than younger patients. No significant difference in response rate, clinical benefit rate or proportion of patients going on to receive second-line therapy was noted between these two groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the two groups, and no significant impact of age on PFS or OS was documented by the Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Of several adverse events, only anemia and fatigue were significantly more frequently observed in older than younger patients. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of dose reduction or discontinuation of sunitinib between the two groups, the interruption of sunitinib was more frequently required in older than younger patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that advanced age alone should not be regarded as a contraindication to the introduction of sunitinib as first-line systemic therapy for mRCC patients. Copyright