| Literature DB >> 29848567 |
Ronan M Doyle1,2, Carrie Burgess3, Rachel Williams3, Rebecca Gorton4, Helen Booth5,6, James Brown7,8, Josephine M Bryant9, Jackie Chan10, Dean Creer7, Jolyon Holdstock10, Heinke Kunst11, Stefan Lozewicz12, Gareth Platt4, Erika Yara Romero3, Graham Speight10, Simon Tiberi11, Ibrahim Abubakar13, Marc Lipman7,8, Timothy D McHugh4, Judith Breuer3.
Abstract
The current methods available to diagnose antimicrobial-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections require a positive culture or only test a limited number of resistance-associated mutations. A rapid accurate identification of antimicrobial resistance enables the prompt initiation of effective treatment. Here, we determine the utility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of M. tuberculosis directly from routinely obtained diagnostic sputum samples to provide a comprehensive resistance profile compared to that from mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) WGS. We sequenced M. tuberculosis from 43 sputum samples by targeted DNA enrichment using the Agilent SureSelectXT kit, and 43 MGIT positive samples from each participant. Thirty two (74%) sputum samples and 43 (100%) MGIT samples generated whole genomes. The times to antimicrobial resistance profiles and concordance were compared with Xpert MTB/RIF and phenotypic resistance testing from cultures of the same samples. Antibiotic susceptibility could be predicted from WGS of sputum within 5 days of sample receipt and up to 24 days earlier than WGS from MGIT culture and up to 31 days earlier than phenotypic testing. Direct sputum results could be reduced to 3 days with faster hybridization and if only regions encoding drug resistance are sequenced. We show that direct sputum sequencing has the potential to provide comprehensive resistance detection significantly faster than MGIT whole-genome sequencing or phenotypic testing of resistance from cultures in a clinical setting. This improved turnaround time enables prompt appropriate treatment with associated patient and health service benefits. Improvements in sample preparation are necessary to ensure comparable sensitivities and complete resistance profile predictions in all cases.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; antimicrobial resistance; pathogen DNA enrichment; whole-genome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848567 PMCID: PMC6062781 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00666-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Microbiol ISSN: 0095-1137 Impact factor: 5.948
Target genes/regions and reason for inclusion in the reduced M. tuberculosis bait set
| Gene target and/or region | Region property |
|---|---|
| Fluoroquinolone resistance | |
| Rifampin resistance | |
| Streptomycin resistance | |
| Streptomycin, amikacin, and kanamycin resistance | |
| Streptomycin resistance | |
| Isoniazid and ethionamide resistance | |
| Isoniazid resistance | |
| Isoniazid resistance | |
| Isoniazid resistance | |
| Capreomycin resistance | |
| Pyrazinamide resistance | |
| Kanamycin resistance | |
| PAS resistance | |
| Ethambutol resistance | |
| Ethambutol resistance | |
| Ethionamide resistance | |
| Direct repeat locus | Spoligotyping |
FIG 1Comparison of the percentages of reference genomes with at least one sequence read covering a position on the y axis by the median depth of coverage on the x axis for each individual sample. This is stratified by whether original sample material was a sputum or MGIT culture.
FIG 2(A) Bar plot showing the percentages of reference genome coverage (a single read covering each genome position) for patients with both sputum and MGIT samples sequenced. The plot is annotated with both Xpert MTB/RIF (GX) and smear microscopy (Smear) results. For GX: ****, high; ***, medium; **, low; *, very low. For smear: ***, 3+; **, 2+; *, 1+; S, scanty; −, negative. Where a result is missing, the test was not carried out. Boxplots showing median depths of coverage for sputum samples stratified by both the quantitative Xpert MTB/RIF measures (B) and semiquantitative smear results (C).
FIG 3Heatmap clustering samples by the pairwise numbers of single nucleotide differences between them. Sample names are formatted such that the patient identifier is at the start followed by whether the sample originated from a MGIT culture or sputum.
FIG 4The time taken in days on the x axis from sample collection (day 0) to when the MGIT samples flag as positive and sequence results become available, as denoted by the gray bars. The time taken for a patient sputum result to become available is marked by three different identifiers depending on whether the sample underwent whole-genome sequencing or partial-genome sequencing and whether the 24-h or 1-h hybridization protocol was used. Sputum samples that failed sequencing are marked by missing symbols. Patient identifiers marked in red had confirmed drug-resistant TB infections.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles from 13 patients with evidence of resistance from direct sputum sequencing using whole-genome bait set
| Patient | Smear result | Rifampicin | Isoniazid | Ethambutol | Pyrazinamide | Streptomycin | PAS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeneXpert RIF resistance | Solid culture phenotype | Solid culture phenotype | Solid culture phenotype | Solid culture phenotype | gid:c.102delG:p.G34fs | Solid culture phenotype | Solid culture phenotype | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | Sputum | MGIT | |||||||||
| BH001MC | + | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | ND | S | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | S | S | ND | S | ND | ND | R | ND | ND |
| BH041OS | + | — | S | — | S | — | R | R | R | — | R | — | S | — | S | R | — | S | — | R | R | — | R | R | — | R | — | S | ND | — | S | ND |
| BH052SA | +++ | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | S | ND |
| BH056ESDS | + | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | R | R | ND |
| RF002AH | + | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | R | R | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | S | ND |
| RF009ZC | Neg | — | S | — | S | — | S | S | S | — | R | — | S | — | S | R | — | S | — | S | S | — | S | S | — | R | — | S | ND | — | S | ND |
| RF015GT | + | — | S | — | S | — | S | R | S | — | S | — | S | — | S | S | — | S | — | S | S | — | S | S | — | S | — | S | ND | — | S | ND |
| RF016SW | ++ | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | S | ND |
| WH006AW | ++ | R | R | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | — | ND | S | S | ND |
| WH017KL | + | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | R | R | ND |
| WH026NS | Neg | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | S | S | ND | S | ND | S | S | ND | S | S | ND | S | ND | S | ND | ND | R | ND |
| WH036ES | Neg | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | R | R | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | S | ND |
| WH037PD | ++ | — | S | — | R | — | S | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | ND | S | S | ND |
S, susceptible.
ND, sample or result not available.
—, low sequence read coverage at position.
R, resistant.