| Literature DB >> 29848328 |
G Cattaneo1, A De Caro2, F Napoli2, D Chiapale3, P Trada3, A Camera2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The social impact of degenerative diseases is steadily increasing, because of the continued rise in the mean age of the active population. Articular cartilage lesions are generally associated with disability and symptoms such as joint pain and reduced function, and remain a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Several non-invasive solution have been proposed, but the results achieved to date are far from being completely satisfactory. Recently, new therapeutic approaches, such as the use of mesenchymal stem cells, have been developed. Among the many sources, the adipose tissue is nowadays considered one of the smartest, due to its abundance and easy access. The aim of this retrospective study is to explore whether patients affected by symptomatic knee osteoarthritis treated with micro-fragmented adipose tissue associated with a chondral shaving procedure experience an improvement in symptoms and function.Entities:
Keywords: ASCs; Knee chondropathy; MSCs; Micro-fragmented adipose tissue; Osteoarthritis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848328 PMCID: PMC5977739 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2105-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Characteristics of the 2 study populations
| SH group | MS group | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| Mean | 53 y.o. | 55 y.o. |
| SD | 12 | 11 |
| Gender | ||
| M | 13 (62%) | 8 (57%) |
| F | 8 (38%) | 6 (43%) |
| BMI | ||
| Mean | 27 | 27 |
| SD | 4 | 4 |
| Smoke | ||
| Smokers/Former | 8 (38%) | 5 (36%) |
| Non Smokers | 13 (62%) | 9 (64%) |
| Grade Chondropathy | ||
| II | 5 (24%) | 2 (14%) |
| III | 8 (38%) | 7 (50%) |
| IV | 8 (38%) | 5 (36%) |
| Grade OA | ||
| 1 | 8 (38%) | 1 (7%) |
| 2 | 4 (19%) | 2 (14%) |
| 3 | 9 (43%) | 11 (79%) |
| Site of Lesion | ||
| FC | 10 (48%) | 11 (79%) |
| PF | 3 (14%) | 3 (21%) |
| TP | 8 (38%) | – |
| Type of Lesion | ||
| Diffused | 16 (76%) | 11 (79%) |
| Focal - mean size | 5 (24%) - 10 mm | 3 (21%) - 14 mm |
| Surgery | SH | SM |
SD standard deviation, FC femoral condyle, PF patellofemoral, TP tibial plateau, SH chondral shaving, SM chondral shaving + meniscectomy
Fig. 1Trend of functional improvements of the SH group from baseline to 12 months’ follow-up. Results are expressed as mean and standard error. A p < 0.05 (T12 vs. T0) was considered statistically significant (# #). a KOOS score. KOOS S = symptoms; KOOS P = pain; KOOS ADL = activity daily living; KOOS Spt = sport; KOOS QoL = quality of life. b WOMAC Index
Knee objective evaluation – summary of the results
| ROM | PAT SUBLUX | Walking | Stairs | Squatting | Strength | Stiffness | Swelling | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SH | ||||||||
| Pre-op | ||||||||
| N | 43% | 86% | 76% | 71% | 5% | 90% | 95% | 57% |
| S | 57% | 14% | 24% | 29% | 95% | 10% | 5% | 43% |
| 6 months | ||||||||
| N | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 71% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| S | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 months | ||||||||
| N | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| S | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| MS | ||||||||
| Pre-op | ||||||||
| N | 36% | 100% | 86% | 43% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 36% |
| S | 64% | 0% | 14% | 57% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 64% |
| 6 months | ||||||||
| N | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 77% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| S | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 months | ||||||||
| N | 100% | 100% | 93% | 100% | 86% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| S | 0% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
N normal, S symptomatic, ROM range of motion, PAT SUBLUX patellar subluxation
Fig. 2Trend of functional improvements of the SM group from baseline to 12 months’ follow-up. Results are expressed as mean and standard error. A p < 0.05 (T12 vs. T0) was considered statistically significant (# #). a KOOS score. KOOS S = symptoms; KOOS P = pain; KOOS ADL = activity daily living; KOOS Spt = sport; KOOS QoL = quality of life. b WOMAC Index
Summary of the results
| Δ KOOS_s | Δ KOOS_p | Δ KOOS_adl | Δ KOOS_spt | Δ KOOS_QoL | Δ WOMAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SH | ||||||
| Mean | 29 | 36 | 37 | 51 | 54 | −36 |
| SE | 1.11 | 1.45 | 1.31 | 1.73 | 1.32 | 1.31 |
| % improved patients | 90% | 86% | 95% | 90% | 95% | 95% |
| SM | ||||||
| Mean | 17 | 12 | 16 | 24 | 26 | −15 |
| SE | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| % improved patients | 64% | 57% | 86% | 71% | 86% | 79% |
Data are expressed as mean Δ (t12-t0) and standard error (SE)
SH chondral shaving, SM chondral shaving + meniscectomy, s symptoms, p pain, adl function in daily living, spt sport, QoL quality of life