| Literature DB >> 29848322 |
Akihiko Hiyama1, Hiroyuki Katoh2, Daisuke Sakai2, Masato Sato2, Masahiro Tanaka2, Masahiko Watanabe2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) analyses have reported that the prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in Japan is 8.7-27.1%. However, these data were obtained using chest-abdominal CT, and no evaluations of sagittal, coronal, and axial images using whole-spine CT have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and characteristic of DISH by whole spinal CT.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography (CT); Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH); Prevalence; Thoracic spine
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29848322 PMCID: PMC5977547 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2108-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Distribution of study population according to sex
| Age group, yrs | Male | Female | ALL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20–39 | 286 | 93 | 379 |
| 40–49 | 167 | 60 | 227 |
| 50–59 | 160 | 46 | 206 |
| 60–69 | 167 | 70 | 237 |
| 70–79 | 162 | 98 | 260 |
| 80–89 | 70 | 77 | 147 |
| 90- | 11 | 12 | 23 |
| 1023 | 456 | 1479 |
Fig. 1CT images of a patient with DISH. Reconstructed CT of sagittal (a), axial (b), coronal (c) and 3D (d) views in a patient with DISH
Distribution of study population according to DISH(+) or (−)
| DISH (+) | DISH (−) | ALL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | N | N | N (%) |
| Male | 216 | 807 | 1023 (69.2) |
| Female | 73 | 383 | 456 (30.8) |
| Male to Female | 3.0: 1 | 2.1: 1 | 2.3: 1 |
| Age, Mean | 71.7 | 50.6 | 54.7 |
| Age group, yrs | N (%) | N (%) | N |
| 20–39 | 1 (0.3) | 378 (99.7) | 379 |
| 40–49 | 10 (4.4) | 217 (95.6) | 227 |
| 50–59 | 34 (16.5) | 172 (83.5) | 206 |
| 60–69 | 68 (28.7) | 169 (71.3) | 237 |
| 70–79 | 100 (38.5) | 160 (61.5) | 260 |
| 80–89 | 64 (43.5) | 83 (56.5) | 147 |
| 90- | 12 (52.2) | 11 (47.8) | 23 |
| Total (%) | 289 (19.5) | 1190 (80.5) | 1479 |
DISH diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, N number
Fig. 2Prevalence of DISH detected by CT. a Age distribution of the prevalence of DISH detected by CT. The prevalence of DISH increased with age in both males and females. b Comparison of the prevalence of DISH between male and female
Fig. 3Prevalence of DISH classified by location in the spine. The levels of fused segments are shown from the cervical to lumbar spine, and involved mainly T8–10
Among 233 subjects who had consecutive ossification in T8 - T10, 142 subjects were found at the apex of the thoracic kyphosis at T8 - T10
| Apex of kyphosis | N | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T5 | 1 | 0.4 | |
| T6 | 11 | 4.7 | |
| T7 | 37 | 15.9 | |
| T8 | 68 | 29.2 | |
| T9 | 47 | 20.2 | 142 (60.9%) |
| T10 | 27 | 11.6 | |
| T11 | 25 | 10.7 | |
| T12 | 11 | 4.7 | |
| L1 | 5 | 2.1 | |
| L3 | 1 | 0.4 | |
| 233 |
N number
Fig. 4Axial (AX) image of the areas showing ossification at T9. a A 58-year-old man presented with DISH between T7–11. The vertebral body was divided into 4 areas from the AX image of T9. In this case ossification was observed in area 1 (arrow). b Location of ossification on vertebral body: Area 1, right anterior; Area 2, left anterior; Area 3, right posterior; Area 4, left posterior. c Ossification was rarely found in vertebral bodies contacting with the aorta and the azygous vein
Axial image of the lesion of ossification at the T9 level among 233 subjects who had consecutive ossification in T8 - T10
| T9 Lesion | T9 Lesion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| Age, yrs | N | % | |||||||
| 20–39 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 40–49 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 14.3 |
| 50–59 | 24 | 24 | 3 | 18 | 1 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 75.0 | 4.2 |
| 60–69 | 54 | 52 | 6 | 24 | 3 | 96.3 | 11.1 | 44.4 | 5.6 |
| 70–79 | 86 | 85 | 25 | 56 | 10 | 98.8 | 29.1 | 65.1 | 11.6 |
| 80–89 | 51 | 51 | 29 | 35 | 18 | 100.0 | 56.9 | 68.6 | 35.3 |
| 90- | 10 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 100.0 | 70.0 | 80.0 | 40.0 |
| 233 | 229 | 71 | 144 | 37 | 98.3 | 30.5 | 61.8 | 15.9 | |
N number