Literature DB >> 29848163

Factors predictive of gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal motility disorders in patients with non-cardiac chest pain.

Juan Gomez Cifuentes1, Rocio Lopez2, Prashanthi N Thota3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) are referred for esophageal motility testing and pH monitoring since gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal motility disorders are frequently encountered in these patients. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and distribution of these disorders and to identify predictors of abnormal esophageal function testing.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of NCCP patients who presented after a negative cardiac evaluation and underwent esophageal manometry, esophageal pH monitoring and upper endoscopy from January 2010 to January 2017. KEY
RESULTS: In a total of 177 patients, esophageal motility disorders were diagnosed in 31% and GERD in 35% of the patients. The most common diagnoses were ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in 14.1%, jackhammer esophagus in 6.8%, diffuse esophageal spasm in 5.1% and achalasia in 2.3% patients. Older age [for every 5-year increment, odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.00-1.3) p = .047] and dysphagia [OR 3.8 (95% CI, 1.9-7.5) p < .001] were predictors of esophageal motility disorders. Older age [for every 5-year increment, OR 1.2 (95% CI, 1.01-1.3) p = .032] was predictive of GERD. Abnormal esophageal testing was associated with male gender [OR 2.2 (95% CI, 1.04-4.6) p = .039], older age [for every 5-year increment, OR 1.2 (95% CI, 1.03-1.3) p = .016] and Caucasian race [OR 3.1 (95% CI, 1.1-8.7) p < .029].
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two thirds of patients presenting with NCCP have GERD or esophageal motility disorders. Esophageal function testing in NCCP should be considered in older patients, men, Caucasians and those presenting with dysphagia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-cardiac chest pain; esophageal motility disorders; esophageal pH monitoring; functional chest pain; gastroesophageal reflux disease; high-resolution esophageal manometry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29848163     DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1452975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  4 in total

Review 1.  Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal Meet.

Authors:  David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 11.382

2.  ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Amit Patel; Robert J Wong; Rena H Yadlapati
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 12.045

3.  Effects of Age on Esophageal Motility: A High-Resolution Manometry Study.

Authors:  Roupen Djinbachian; Etienne Marchand; Weixiang Yan; Mickael Bouin
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Management of Functional Chest Pain in the Rome IV Era.

Authors:  Ronnie Fass; Fahmi Shibli; Jose Tawil
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.