Literature DB >> 29847626

Examining the Association of Antidepressant Prescriptions With First Abortion and First Childbirth.

Julia R Steinberg1, Thomas M Laursen2,3,4, Nancy E Adler5, Christiane Gasse2,3,4, Esben Agerbo2,3,4, Trine Munk-Olsen2,3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: The repercussions of abortion for mental health have been used to justify state policies that limit access to abortion in the United States. Much earlier research has relied on self-report of abortion or mental health conditions or on convenience samples. This study uses data that rely on neither. Objective: To examine whether first-trimester first abortion or first childbirth is associated with an increase in women's initiation of a first-time prescription for an antidepressant. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study linked data and identified a cohort of women from Danish population registries who were born in Denmark between January 1, 1980, and December 30, 1994. Overall, 396 397 women were included in this study; of these women, 30 834 had a first-trimester first abortion and 85 592 had a first childbirth. Main Outcomes and Measure: First-time antidepressant prescription redemptions were determined and used as indication of an episode of depression or anxiety, and incident rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated comparing women who had an abortion vs women who did not have an abortion and women who had a childbirth vs women who did not have a childbirth.
Results: Of 396 397 women whose data were analyzed, 17 294 (4.4%) had a record of at least 1 first-trimester abortion and no children, 72 052 (18.2%) had at least 1 childbirth and no abortions, 13 540 (3.4%) had at least 1 abortion and 1 childbirth, and 293 511 (74.1%) had neither an abortion nor a childbirth. A total of 59 465 (15.0%) had a record of first antidepressant use. In the basic and fully adjusted models, relative to women who had not had an abortion, women who had a first abortion had a higher risk of first-time antidepressant use. However, the fully adjusted IRRs that compared women who had an abortion with women who did not have an abortion were not statistically different in the year before the abortion (IRR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.38-1.54) and the year after the abortion (IRR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.45-1.62) (P = .10) and decreased as time from the abortion increased (1-5 years: IRR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19-1.29; >5 years: IRR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18). The fully adjusted IRRs that compared women who gave birth with women who did not give birth were lower in the year before childbirth (IRR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.43-0.50) compared with the year after childbirth (IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) (P < .001) and increased as time from the childbirth increased (1-5 years: IRR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.47-1.56; >5 years: IRR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.91-2.09). Across all women in the sample, the strongest risk factors associated with antidepressant use in the fully adjusted model were having a previous psychiatric contact (IRR, 3.70; 95% CI, 3.62-3.78), having previously obtained an antianxiety medication (IRR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.99-3.10), and having previously obtained antipsychotic medication (IRR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.81-1.96). Conclusions and Relevance: Women who have abortions are more likely to use antidepressants compared with women who do not have abortions. However, additional aforementioned findings from this study support the conclusion that increased use of antidepressants is not attributable to having had an abortion but to differences in risk factors for depression. Thus, policies based on the notion that abortion harms women's mental health may be misinformed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847626      PMCID: PMC6143090          DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry        ISSN: 2168-622X            Impact factor:   21.596


  24 in total

Review 1.  Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  Brenda Major; Mark Appelbaum; Linda Beckman; Mary Ann Dutton; Nancy Felipe Russo; Carolyn West
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009-12

Review 2.  Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009.

Authors:  Priscilla K Coleman
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  Prescription and indication trends of antidepressant drugs in the Netherlands between 1996 and 2012: a dynamic population-based study.

Authors:  Raymond Noordam; Nikkie Aarts; Katia M Verhamme; Miriam C M Sturkenboom; Bruno H Stricker; Loes E Visser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Treatment Indications for Antidepressants Prescribed in Primary Care in Quebec, Canada, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Jenna Wong; Aude Motulsky; Tewodros Eguale; David L Buckeridge; Michal Abrahamowicz; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register.

Authors:  Ole Mors; Gurli P Perto; Preben Bo Mortensen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  The Danish Civil Registration System.

Authors:  Carsten Bøcker Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  More than poverty: disruptive events among women having abortions in the USA.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Lori Frohwirth; Ann M Moore
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-08-20

8.  Abortion and mental health disorders: evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  David M Fergusson; L John Horwood; Joseph M Boden
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients.

Authors:  Sandra K Thygesen; Christian F Christiansen; Steffen Christensen; Timothy L Lash; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.

Authors:  Morten Schmidt; Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir Schmidt; Jakob Lynge Sandegaard; Vera Ehrenstein; Lars Pedersen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Understanding Decision-Making and Decision Difficulty in Women With an Unintended Pregnancy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marieke Brauer; Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen; Hennie Boeije; Carolus van Nijnatten
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2018-12-21

3.  Affective and Substance Abuse Disorders Following Abortion by Pregnancy Intention in the United States: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Donald Paul Sullins
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Centrality of Pregnancy and Prenatal Attachment in Pregnant Nulliparous After Recent Elective or Therapeutic Abortion.

Authors:  Martina Smorti; Lucia Ponti; Lucia Bonassi; Elena Cattaneo; Chiara Ionio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Depression and quality of life among pregnant women in first and third trimesters in Abeokuta: A comparative study.

Authors:  Adetoun O Soyemi; Oladipo A Sowunmi; Sunday M Amosu; Emmanuel O Babalola
Journal:  S Afr J Psychiatr       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 1.550

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.