Literature DB >> 29847488

Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sultan Mahmood1,2, Samid M Farooqui2, Mohammad F Madhoun1,2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate factors contributing to poor bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy procedures. We used a reproducible search strategy to identify studies, searching 10 medical databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Medline, and Cochrane Library Database for reports published between 2000 and 2016. Fully published studies, evaluating risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation, were included. Two reviewers independently scored the identified studies for methodology and abstracted pertinent data. Pooling was conducted with both fixed-effects and random-effects models; results were presented from the random effects model when heterogeneity was significant. Odds ratios (OR) estimates with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed by I statistics. Twenty-four studies with a total of 49 868 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age (OR: -1.20), male sex (OR: 0.85), inpatient status (OR: 0.57), diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.58), hypertension (OR: 0.58), cirrhosis (OR: 0.49), narcotic use (OR: 0.59), constipation (OR: 0.61), stroke (OR; 0.51), and tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) use (0.51), were associated with inadequate bowel preparation. In our sensitivity analysis comparing Western and Asian countries, we found that diabetes, cirrhosis, male sex, history of stroke and TCA use were stronger risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in Western countries than in Asian countries. We also found that history of stroke, TCA use, and race were risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation in patients receiving conventional bowel preparation compared with those receiving split-dose bowel preparation. Multiple risk factors affect the quality of bowel preparation and specific risk factors can be intervened upon, in different populations, to optimize preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847488     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  26 in total

1.  Can a 1-day clear liquid diet with a split -dose polyethylene glycol overcome conventional practice patterns during the preparation for screening colonoscopy?

Authors:  Diğdem Özer Etik; Nuretdin Suna; Cemre Gündüz; Ahmet Bostan; Alperen Özdemir; Bade Yağmur Gürel; Ezgi Yenişekerci; Ahmet Sedat Boyacıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  External validation of two prediction models for adequate bowel preparation in Asia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Hui Gao; Cenqin Liu; Weihong Wang; Jiarong Xie; Zhixin Zhang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Predictors of poor bowel preparations and colonoscopy cancellations in inpatient colonoscopies, a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Rohit Agrawal; Muhammad Majeed; Bashar M Attar; Estefania Flores; Zohaib Haque; Sheeba Ba Aqeel; Yuchen Wang; Yazan Abu Omar; Pradeep Parajuli; Melchor Demetria; Seema Gandhi
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

4.  The Patient Experience of an Inadequate-Quality Bowel Preparation During the Colonoscopy Process: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Christine Cleary Kimpel; Kemberlee Bonnet; David Schlundt
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.159

5.  Endoscopic Disease Activity and Biologic Therapy Are Independent Predictors of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Vinayak Shenoy; Megan C Buckley; Laura Durbin; James Mackey; Anjali Mone; Arun Swaminath
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  A 3-day low-fibre diet does not improve colonoscopy preparation results compared to a 1-day diet: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Filipe Taveira; Miguel Areia; Luís Elvas; Susana Alves; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana T Cadime
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 7.  Framework and Strategies to Eliminate Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Kevin Selby; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  Safety and efficacy of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and citric acid bowel preparation in patients with baseline renal impairment or diabetes: subanalysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Gautam N Mankaney; Masakazu Ando; David N Dahdal; Carol A Burke
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.409

9.  Role of Bowel Preparation in Adenoma Detection Rate and Follow-up Recommendations in African American Dominant Patient Population.

Authors:  Hamid-Reza Moein; Eskara Pervez; Salina Faidhalla; Heba Habbal; Hajra Khan; Anshu Wadehra; Mahvish Khalid; Diana Kakos; Paul Naylor; Bashar Mohamad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.

Authors:  Sandra Baile-Maxia; Bharat Amlani; Rodrigo Jover Martínez
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.