Literature DB >> 29847485

Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 13 - benefits and adverse events in older and younger patients with hypertension: overview, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials.

Costas Thomopoulos1, Gianfranco Parati2,3, Alberto Zanchetti4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is overwhelming evidence that blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment can reduce cardiovascular outcomes also in the elderly, but some important aspects influencing medical practice are controversial as sufficient evidence has not been provided by single randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas evidence may result from a systematic search and meta-analysis of all available data.
OBJECTIVES: The following clinically relevant issues concerning the effects of BP lowering in older and younger individuals have been investigated: differences in benefits; the oldest and the youngest age range for which evidence of BP-lowering effects is available; the SBP level at which BP-lowering treatment should be initiated; the SBP and DBP levels treatment should be aimed at; differences in treatment burdens and harms.
METHODS: A database we previously identified of 72 BP-lowering RCTs in 260 210 patients was searched for separately reported data on older and younger individuals [cutoffs of 65 (primary analyses), 70, 75, 80, 60 and 55 years). The data were further stratified according to the levels of baseline (untreated) BP, and of on-treatment achieved SBP or DBP. Seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were considered for benefits. Burdens and harms were investigated as permanent treatment discontinuations for adverse events, and hypotension/syncope. Risk ratios and absolute risk changes were calculated by a random effects model. Effects at older and younger ages were compared by heterogeneity test.
RESULTS: Thirty-two RCTs provided data on 96 549 patients older than 65 years, and 31 RCTs on 114 009 patients younger than 65 years. All cardiovascular outcomes were significantly reduced by treatment both in older and younger individuals, without significant age-dependent differences in relative risk reduction but with significantly higher absolute risk reductions in older individuals. The extreme age ranges for which evidence of significant benefits of treatment were available was greater than 80 and less than 55 years. Only one RCT provided data on benefits of BP-lowering at age greater than 65 when treatment was initiated at SBP values in the grade 1 range, but more consistent evidence was provided when age was greater than 60 years. Both in patients older and younger than 65 years, significant reductions of cardiovascular outcomes were found at on-treatment SBP less than 140 mmHg and DBP less than 80 mmHg. There was no evidence that treatment discontinuations for adverse events or hypotension/syncope were more frequent at age greater than 65.
CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive treatment should be recommended to all individuals with elevated BP, independent of age. The prudent recommendation to initiate treatment at SBP values 140-159 mmHg is supported at older age defined as greater than 60 years. SBP and DBP values lower than 140 mmHg and, respectively, 80 mmHg can be aimed at with incremental benefits without disproportionate burdens until age 80 years, above which available evidence is for benefits at on-treatment SBP 140-149 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847485     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

1.  The clinical value of automated office blood pressure: What is the latest evidence on attended vs unattended automated readings in clinical practice?

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Association of Depression with Uncontrolled Hypertension in Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study in Less-Developed Northwest China.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Nanfang Li; Mulalibieke Heizhati; Mei Li; Zhikang Yang; Zhongrong Wang; Reyila Abudereyimu
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.420

3.  Changes in the prevalence of obesity and hypertension and demographic risk factor profiles in China over 10 years: two national cross-sectional surveys.

Authors:  Yongze Li; Di Teng; Xiaoguang Shi; Xiaochun Teng; Weiping Teng; Zhongyan Shan; Yaxin Lai
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-07-31

4.  Effects of Aerobic Training Progression on Blood Pressure in Individuals With Hypertension: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Guilherme Tadeu de Barcelos; Isabel Heberle; Juliana Cavestré Coneglian; Bruno Allan Vieira; Rodrigo Sudatti Delevatti; Aline Mendes Gerage
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-02-17

5.  Characterising older adults' risk of harm from blood-pressure lowering medications: a sub-analysis from the PRIME study.

Authors:  Ahmed Hussain; Khalid Ali; Nikesh Parekh; Jennifer M Stevenson; J Graham Davies; Stephen Bremner; Chakravarthi Rajkumar
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Deprescribing in Primary Care: a Markov Modelling Study Using Data From the OPTiMISE Trial.

Authors:  Sue Jowett; Shahela Kodabuckus; Gary A Ford; F D Richard Hobbs; Mark Lown; Jonathan Mant; Rupert Payne; Richard J McManus; James P Sheppard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 9.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.