Literature DB >> 29847254

Cross-cultural perspectives on decision making regarding noninvasive prenatal testing: A comparative study of Lebanon and Quebec.

Hazar Haidar1, Meredith Vanstone2, Anne-Marie Laberge3,4, Gilles Bibeau5, Labib Ghulmiyyah6, Vardit Ravitsky7.   

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), based on the detection of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood, has transformed the landscape of prenatal care by offering clinical benefits (noninvasive, high specificity and sensitivity, early detection of abnormalities) compared to existing prenatal screening tests. NIPT has expanded rapidly and is currently commercially available in most of the world. As NIPT spreads globally, culturally sensitive and ethically sound implementation will require policies that take into consideration the social and cultural context of prenatal testing decisions. In a Western context, the main ethical argument for providing access and public funding of prenatal tests is the promotion of reproductive autonomy (also referred to as "procreative liberty" and "reproductive freedom"), by enabling pregnant women and couples to access information about the fetus in order to choose a certain course of action for pregnancy management (continuation of pregnancy and preparation for birth or termination). So how is the framework of reproductive autonomy operationalized in non-Western cultural contexts? We used Quebec, Canada, and Beirut, Lebanon, for case studies to explore what ethical considerations related to reproductive autonomy should guide the implementation of the test in various cultural contexts. To answer this question, we conducted a qualitative study to (1) explore the perceptions, values, and preferences of pregnant women and their partners about NIPT and (2) examine how these values and perceptions influence reproductive autonomy and decision making in relation to NIPT in these two different cultural settings, Lebanon and Quebec. Our findings may guide health care professionals in providing counseling and in helping women and their partners make better informed prenatal testing decisions. Further, at a policy level, such understanding might inform the development of local guidelines and policies that are appropriate to each context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lebanon; Quebec; decision making; noninvasive prenatal testing; reproductive autonomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847254     DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2018.1469551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  4 in total

1.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

2.  The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Sophie Montgomery; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  A qualitative study of women and partners from Lebanon and Quebec regarding an expanded scope of noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Hazar Haidar; Jessica Le Clerc-Blain; Meredith Vanstone; Anne-Marie Laberge; Gilles Bibeau; Labib Ghulmiyyah; Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views from Lebanon and Quebec.

Authors:  Hazar Haidar; Meredith Vanstone; Anne-Marie Laberge; Gilles Bibeau; Labib Ghulmiyyah; Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.