Jillian B Harvey1, Shawn Valenta2, Kit Simpson1, Mark Lyles3, James McElligott2. 1. 1 Department of Healthcare Leadership and Management, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 2. 2 Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 3. 3 College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
Background and Introduction: Telehealth is a promising approach to improving healthcare access and quality. While coverage for telehealthcare has expanded, reimbursement remains one of the biggest barriers to provider adoption. Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have enacted parity legislation requiring private insurance companies to provide some level of reimbursement coverage for telehealth services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this article is to describe the trends in telehealth utilization from 2010 to 2015 for privately insured patients. Using a nationally representative sample of patient data from the 2010-2015 Truven® MarketScan Commercial Claims dataset, we examine the change over time in the utilization of outpatient telehealth visits between states enacting parity legislation and those who do not. RESULTS: We found the states with parity laws saw significant increases in the number of outpatient telehealth visits. Controlling for year, the odds of receiving a telehealth visit in a parity state were 29.8% greater than in a nonparity state (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Telehealth remains a small percentage of all outpatient private health insurance claims. Enactment of telehealth parity legislation is related to significant increases in the utilization of telehealth outpatient services. Further expansion of private telehealth insurance coverage may encourage increased utilization of telehealth services. However, telehealth reimbursement coverage varies greatly across parity states. Future examination of the impact of individual state-level policy options on telehealth utilization is warranted.
Background and Introduction: Telehealth is a promising approach to improving healthcare access and quality. While coverage for telehealthcare has expanded, reimbursement remains one of the biggest barriers to provider adoption. Thirty-four states and the District of Columbia have enacted parity legislation requiring private insurance companies to provide some level of reimbursement coverage for telehealth services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this article is to describe the trends in telehealth utilization from 2010 to 2015 for privately insured patients. Using a nationally representative sample of patient data from the 2010-2015 Truven® MarketScan Commercial Claims dataset, we examine the change over time in the utilization of outpatient telehealth visits between states enacting parity legislation and those who do not. RESULTS: We found the states with parity laws saw significant increases in the number of outpatient telehealth visits. Controlling for year, the odds of receiving a telehealth visit in a parity state were 29.8% greater than in a nonparity state (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Telehealth remains a small percentage of all outpatient private health insurance claims. Enactment of telehealth parity legislation is related to significant increases in the utilization of telehealth outpatient services. Further expansion of private telehealth insurance coverage may encourage increased utilization of telehealth services. However, telehealth reimbursement coverage varies greatly across parity states. Future examination of the impact of individual state-level policy options on telehealth utilization is warranted.
Authors: Narek Shaverdian; Erin F Gillespie; Elaine Cha; Soo Young Kim; Stephanie Benvengo; Fumiko Chino; Jung Julie Kang; Yuelin Li; Thomas M Atkinson; Nancy Lee; Charles M Washington; Oren Cahlon; Daniel R Gomez Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Hemali Patel; Amy Hassell; Brittany Cyriacks; Brett Fisher; William Tonelli; Christopher Davis Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 1.200
Authors: Christopher H Kim; Monica K Lieng; Tina L Rylee; Kevin A Gee; James P Marcin; Joy A Melnikow Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Jedrek Wosik; Marat Fudim; Blake Cameron; Ziad F Gellad; Alex Cho; Donna Phinney; Simon Curtis; Matthew Roman; Eric G Poon; Jeffrey Ferranti; Jason N Katz; James Tcheng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ji E Chang; Alden Yuanhong Lai; Avni Gupta; Ann M Nguyen; Carolyn A Berry; Donna R Shelley Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 6.237