Literature DB >> 29847005

Early versus later treatment start in multiple sclerosis: a register-based cohort study.

T A Chalmer1,2, L M Baggesen3, M Nørgaard3, N Koch-Henriksen2,3, M Magyari1,2, P S Sorensen1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To assess long-term treatment effectiveness of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) initiated early in disease course versus later treatment start.
METHODS: We included all Danish patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with DMT through two nationwide population-based MS registries. Patients were categorized as early treated if treatment started within 2 years after the first MS symptom (n = 2316) and later treated if treatment started between 2 and 8 years after clinical onset (n = 1479). We compared time from treatment start to progression to an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 6 and mortality between cohorts as hazard ratio (HR) using a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustment for stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time of 3795 patients was 7.0 (range 0.6-19.5) years for the EDSS score of 6 outcome and 10.4 (range 1.2-20.1) years for the mortality outcome. Patients with later treatment start showed a 42% increased hazard rate of reaching an EDSS score of 6 compared with the early-treated patients [HR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.70; P < 0.001]. When stratified by sex, the increased hazard among later-treated women persisted (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22-1.93; P < 0.001), whereas the HR was lower in men (1.25; 95% CI, 0.93-1.69; P = 0.15). Mortality was increased by 38% in later starters (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.96-1.99; P = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who started treatment with DMT later reached an EDSS score of 6 more quickly compared with patients who started early and the delay showed a tendency to shorten time to death. Our results support the use of early treatment.
© 2018 EAN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort study; epidemiology; immunomodulating therapy; multiple sclerosis; sex difference

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29847005     DOI: 10.1111/ene.13692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurol        ISSN: 1351-5101            Impact factor:   6.089


  18 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic Advances in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jennifer H Yang; Torge Rempe; Natalie Whitmire; Anastasie Dunn-Pirio; Jennifer S Graves
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Importance of early treatment decisions on future income of multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Andrius Kavaliunas; Ali Manouchehrinia; Hanna Gyllensten; Kristina Alexanderson; Jan Hillert
Journal:  Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin       Date:  2020-10-07

Review 3.  [Multiple sclerosis treatment consensus group (MSTCG): position paper on disease-modifying treatment of multiple sclerosis 2021 (white paper)].

Authors:  Heinz Wiendl; Ralf Gold; Thomas Berger; Tobias Derfuss; Ralf Linker; Mathias Mäurer; Martin Stangel; Orhan Aktas; Karl Baum; Martin Berghoff; Stefan Bittner; Andrew Chan; Adam Czaplinski; Florian Deisenhammer; Franziska Di Pauli; Renaud Du Pasquier; Christian Enzinger; Elisabeth Fertl; Achim Gass; Klaus Gehring; Claudio Gobbi; Norbert Goebels; Michael Guger; Aiden Haghikia; Hans-Peter Hartung; Fedor Heidenreich; Olaf Hoffmann; Zoë R Hunter; Boris Kallmann; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Luisa Klotz; Verena Leussink; Fritz Leutmezer; Volker Limmroth; Jan D Lünemann; Andreas Lutterotti; Sven G Meuth; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Michael Platten; Peter Rieckmann; Stephan Schmidt; Hayrettin Tumani; Martin S Weber; Frank Weber; Uwe K Zettl; Tjalf Ziemssen; Frauke Zipp
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Apparent changes in the epidemiology and severity of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Nils Koch-Henriksen; Melinda Magyari
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 42.937

5.  How do patients enter the healthcare system after the first onset of multiple sclerosis symptoms? The influence of setting and physician specialty on speed of diagnosis.

Authors:  Laura Barin; Christian P Kamm; Anke Salmen; Holger Dressel; Pasquale Calabrese; Caroline Pot; Sven Schippling; Claudio Gobbi; Stefanie Müller; Andrew Chan; Stephanie Rodgers; Marco Kaufmann; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Nina Steinemann; Jürg Kesselring; Milo A Puhan; Viktor von Wyl
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Study protocol: randomised controlled trial evaluating exercise therapy as a supplemental treatment strategy in early multiple sclerosis: the Early Multiple Sclerosis Exercise Study (EMSES).

Authors:  Morten Riemenschneider; Lars G Hvid; Steffen Ringgaard; Mikkel K E Nygaard; Simon F Eskildsen; Thor Petersen; Egon Stenager; Ulrik Dalgas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Health economics of disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.570

8.  Early High Efficacy Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis Is the Best Predictor of Future Disease Activity Over 1 and 2 Years in a Norwegian Population-Based Registry.

Authors:  Cecilia Smith Simonsen; Heidi Øyen Flemmen; Line Broch; Cathrine Brunborg; Pål Berg-Hansen; Stine Marit Moen; Elisabeth Gulowsen Celius
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  An argument for broad use of high efficacy treatments in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  James M Stankiewicz; Howard L Weiner
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2019-11-22

10.  The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry.

Authors:  Melinda Magyari; Hanna Joensen; Bjarne Laursen; Nils Koch-Henriksen
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.