Literature DB >> 29846548

Assessment of body composition and sarcopenia in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

P R Boshier1,2, R Heneghan1, S R Markar2, V E Baracos3, D E Low1.   

Abstract

There has recently been increased interest in the assessment of body composition in patients with esophageal cancer for the purpose of nutritional evaluation and prognostication. This systematic review and meta-analysis intends to summarize and critically evaluate the current literature concerning the assessment of body composition in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess its potential implication upon early and late outcomes. A systematic literature search (up to August, 2017) was conducted for studies describing the assessment of body composition in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer. Meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes including long-term survival was performed using random effects models. Twenty-nine studies reported the assessment of body composition in 3193 patients. Methods used to assess body composition in patients with esophageal cancer included computerized tomography (n = 18 studies), bioelectrical impedance analysis (n = 10), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (n = 1). Significant variability was observed in regard to study design and the criteria used to define individual parameters of body composition. Sarcopenic patients had a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (7 studies, OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.32-3.11, P = 0.001) after esophagectomy. Meta-analysis of six studies presenting long-term outcomes after esophagectomy identified significantly worse survival in patients who were sarcopenic (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.33- 2.17, P < 0.0001). The assessment of body composition has the potential to become a clinically useful tool that could support decision-making in patients with esophageal cancer. Current evidence is however weakened by inconsistencies in methods of assessing and reporting body composition in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846548     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  36 in total

1.  Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for the Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gabriel F P Aleixo; Shlomit S Shachar; Kirsten A Nyrop; Hyman B Muss; Claudio L Battaglini; Grant R Williams
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-12

2.  Nomogram for prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer after minimally invasive esophagectomy established based on non-textbook outcome.

Authors:  Shao-Jun Xu; Lan-Qin Lin; Ting-Yu Chen; Cheng-Xiong You; Chao Chen; Rui-Qin Chen; Shu-Chen Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does VO2peak Provide a Prognostic Value in Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy for Post-operative Outcomes?

Authors:  Timo Niels; Christoph T Baltin; Guido Kosanke; Ulrich K Fetzner; Arnulf H Hoelscher; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jan-Hendrik Naendrup; Freerk T Baumann
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Automated versus manual analysis of body composition measures on computed tomography in patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Rigiroli; Dylan Zhang; Jeroen Molinger; Yingqi Wang; Andrew Chang; Paul E Wischmeyer; Brant A Inman; Rajan T Gupta
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.531

5.  Cut-off values for low skeletal muscle mass at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Najiba Chargi; Sandra I Bril; Ernst J Smid; Pim A de Jong; Remco de Bree
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

6.  Sarcopenia does not affect postoperative complication rates in oesophageal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Schizas; M Frountzas; I Lidoriki; E Spartalis; K Toutouzas; D Dimitroulis; T Liakakos; K S Mylonas
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Effects of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative complications of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinxin Xu; Bin Zheng; Shuliang Zhang; Taidui Zeng; Hao Chen; Wei Zheng; Chun Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Influence of Postoperative Changes in Sarcopenia on Long-Term Survival in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Chungyeop Lee; In-Ja Park; Kyung-Won Kim; Yongbin Shin; Seok-Byung Lim; Chan-Wook Kim; Yong-Sik Yoon; Jong-Lyul Lee; Chang-Sik Yu; Jin-Cheon Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  The Spectrum of Malnutrition/Cachexia/Sarcopenia in Oncology According to Different Cancer Types and Settings: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Paolo Bossi; Paolo Delrio; Annalisa Mascheroni; Michela Zanetti
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis for the Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gabriel F P Aleixo; Shlomit S Shachar; Kirsten A Nyrop; Hyman B Muss; Claudio L Battaglini; Grant R Williams
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.