| Literature DB >> 29846413 |
Jéssica Cavalcante Dos Santos1, Marina Sampaio Cruz1, Raul Hernandes Bortolin1, Katiene Macêdo de Oliveira1, Jéssica Nayara Góes de Araújo1, Victor Hugo Rezende Duarte1, Ananília Medeiros Gomes da Silva1, Isabelle Cristina Clemente Dos Santos1, Juliana Marinho de Oliveira Dantas2, Maria Sanali Moura de Oliveira Paiva2, Adriana Augusto Rezende1, Mario Hiroyuki Hirata3, Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata3, André Ducati Luchessi1, Vivian Nogueira Silbiger1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory molecules play a role in the development of atherosclerosis, which is the primary origin of cardiovascular disorders. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has attempted to investigate the relationship between these circulating molecules and the prediction of cardiovascular risk. The present study aimed to investigate the relationships of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, E-selectin and matrix metalloproteinase 9 serum concentrations with the extent of coronary lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29846413 PMCID: PMC5960074 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Demographic, anthropometric and clinical data from patients classified according to the extent of the coronary lesion.
| Variable | Total (74) | No lesion (23) | Minor lesion (22) | Intermediate lesion (20) | Major lesion (9) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 60±10 | 56±9 | 61±10 | 63±10 | 62±7 | 0.061 |
| Gender, male | 55.4 (41) | 43.5 (10) | 59.1 (13) | 70.0 (14) | 44.4 (4) | 0.307 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.5±5.4 | 27.4±4.3 | 25.5±7.6 | 26.4±4.2 | 26.3±3.4 | 0.752 |
| Obesity, % | 17.6 (13) | 26.1 (6) | 18.2 (4) | 15.0 (3) | 0.0 (0) | 0.437 |
| Dyslipidemia, % | 85.1 (63) | 69.6 (16) | 90.9 (20) | 95.0 (19) | 100 (9) | 0.085 |
| Diabetes, % | 32.4 (24) | 34.8 (8) | 22.7 (5) | 35.0 (7) | 44.4 (4) | 0.647 |
| Hypertension, % | 81.1 (60) | 78.3 (18) | 81.8 (18) | 80.0 (16) | 88.9 (8) | 0.919 |
| Diastolic pressure, mmHg | 84±18 | 80±9 | 83±22 | 87±17 | 89±29 | 0.588 |
| Systolic pressure, mmHg | 143±26 | 137±23 | 143±24 | 151±34 | 141±20 | 0.472 |
| Treated hypertension, % | 77.0 (57) | 78.3 (18) | 81.8 (18) | 70.0 (14) | 77.8 (7) | 0.715 |
| Sedentary lifestyle, % | 55.4 (41) | 52.2 (12) | 50.0 (11) | 60.0 (12) | 66.7 (6) | 0.804 |
| Alcoholism, % | 16.2 (12) | 21.7 (5) | 18.2 (4) | 5.0 (1) | 22.2 (2) | 0.445 |
| Smoking, % | 23.0 (17) | 21.7 (5) | 18.2 (4) | 25.0 (5) | 33.3 (3) | 0.826 |
| AIM family history, % | 43.2 (32) | 39.1 (9) | 31.8 (7) | 50.0 (10) | 66.7 (6) | 0.294 |
Data are shown as the mean ± SD or the percentage for categorical variables (number of patients) and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test or ANOVA for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables. BMI: body mass index; and AMI: acute myocardial infarction. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Biochemical data according to the extent of the coronary lesion.
| Variable | Total (74) | No lesion (23) | Minor lesion (22) | Intermediate lesion (20) | Major lesion (9) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose, mmol/L | 6.17±2.95 | 5.76±2.34 | 5.68±1.82 | 7.10±4.37 | 6.38±2.62 | 0.408 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.73±1.20 | 4.47±1.04 | 4.58±1.02 | 5+11±1.44 | 4.91±1.42 | 0.305 |
| HDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.98±0.27 | 1.04±0.31 | 0.93±0.22 | 0.93±0.26 | 1.03±0.29 | 0.414 |
| LDL cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.86±1.07 | 2.64±0.90 | 2.68±0.89 | 3.16±1.31 | 3.22±1.28 | 0.261 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.97±1.48 | 1.70±1.30 | 2.11±1.44 | 2.37±1.87 | 1.46±0.76 | 0.157 |
| ALT, µKat/L | 0.51±0.36 | 0.50±0.39 | 0.52±0.23 | 0.48±0.45 | 0.58±0.39 | 0.298 |
| AST, µKat/L | 0.57±0.32 | 0.65±0.38 | 0.54±0.29 | 0.51±0.22 | 0.63±0.39 | 0.639 |
| Urea, mmol/L | 13.45±3.72 | 13.03±3.68 | 13.52±3.26 | 14.10±4.40 | 12.98±3.82 | 0.864 |
| Creatinine K, µmol/L | 84.0±258 | 85.0±24.2 | 81.6±20.0 | 89.7±28.3 | 74.6±36.7 | 0.505 |
| Uric acid, mmol/L | 0.29±0.09 | 0.29±0.10 | 0.30±0.10 | 0.28±0.10 | 0.28±0.08 | 0.965 |
| E-selectin, ng/mL | 32.5±16.8 | 33.5±19.8 | 30.4±14.6 | 34.4±17.3 | 30.6±14.6 | 0.855 |
| VCAM-1, ng/mL | 990.0±270.3 | 994.3±330.3 | 899.7±214.7 | 1080.2±282.0 | 998.9±118.3 | 0.196 |
| ICAM-1, ng/mL | 152.2±53.7 | 152.6±68.4 | 161.9±58.0 | 144.9±39.5 | 144.0±21.1 | 0.695 |
| MMP9, ng/mL | 324.2±156.4 | 348.8±198.5 | 302.9±127.7 | 351.8±146.3 | 252.2±102.6 | 0.325 |
Number of individuals in parentheses. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test or ANOVA. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; AST: alanine aminotransferase; and ALT: aspartate aminotransferase. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 1Friesinger Index in patients undergoing coronary angiography for the first time stratified by tertiles of serum protein levels. (A) Individuals with higher VCAM-1 concentrations (≥876 ng/mL) are likely to have higher Friesinger Index values. Serum (B) ICAM-1, (C) MMP9 and (D) E-selectin levels were not associated with increased Friesinger Index values. Data are shown as the mean ± SD. * represents a significant difference compared with the 1st tertile.
Logistic regression analysis: influence of increased VCAM-1 concentrations (>876 ng/mL) on the extent of the coronary lesion.
| Dependent variable | Covariable | OR | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VCAM-1 >876 ng/mL | No lesion | 1 | ||
| Minor lesion | 1.309 | 0.405-4.226 | 0.652 | |
| Intermediate lesion | 9.818 | 1.840-52.384 |
Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the Friesinger Index using a VCAM-1 serum concentration >876 ng/mL as a dependent variable. This analysis was not performed with the Major lesion group because, in this study, all patients with major lesions had VCAM-1 concentrations >876 ng/mL.
OR: odds ratio; and CI: confidence interval.