Literature DB >> 29846104

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

Antonio C Wolff1, M Elizabeth Hale Hammond1, Kimberly H Allison1, Brittany E Harvey1, Pamela B Mangu1, John M S Bartlett1, Michael Bilous1, Ian O Ellis1, Patrick Fitzgibbons1, Wedad Hanna1, Robert B Jenkins1, Michael F Press1, Patricia A Spears1, Gail H Vance1, Giuseppe Viale1, Lisa M McShane1, Mitchell Dowsett1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE.—: To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. METHODS.—: Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS.—: Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in >10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not "must") be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended workup for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥2.0; average HER2 copy number <4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥4.0 and <6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846104     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0902-SA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.686


  137 in total

1.  BNP as a marker for early prediction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Lu; Yingying Zhao; Caiping Chen; Chao Han; Li Xue; Dan Xing; Ou Huang; Min Tao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Can we avoid axillary lymph node dissection in N2 breast cancer patients with chemo-sensitive tumours such as HER2 and TNBC?

Authors:  Amparo Garcia-Tejedor; Sergi Fernandez-Gonzalez; Raul Ortega; Miguel Gil-Gil; Hector Perez-Montero; Eulalia Fernandez-Montolí; Agostina Stradella; Sabela Recalde; Teresa Soler; Anna Petit; Maria Teresa Bajen; Ana Benitez; Anna Guma; Miriam Campos; Maria J Pla; Evelyn Martinez; Maria Laplana; Sonia Pernas; Diana Perez-Sildekova; Isabel Catala; Jordi Ponce; Catalina Falo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Authors:  Esther C Yoon; Christopher Schwartz; Edi Brogi; Katia Ventura; Hannah Wen; Farbod Darvishian
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) in early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Britt K Erickson; Omar Najjar; Shari Damast; Adriana Blakaj; Joan Tymon-Rosario; Maryam Shahi; Alessandro Santin; Molly Klein; Michelle Dolan; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Natalia Buza; J Stuart Ferriss; Rebecca L Stone; Mahmoud Khalifa; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Mechanism, safety and efficacy of three tyrosine kinase inhibitors lapatinib, neratinib and pyrotinib in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Cheng Xuhong; Xiao-Wei Qi; Yi Zhang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Increased ERBB2 Gene Copy Numbers Reveal a Subset of Salivary Duct Carcinomas with High Densities of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes and PD-L1 Expression.

Authors:  Kyriakos Chatzopoulos; Andrea R Collins; Sotiris Sotiriou; Michael G Keeney; Daniel W Visscher; Michael Rivera; David J Schembri-Wismayer; Jean E Lewis; Patricia T Greipp; William R Sukov; Ashish V Chintakuntlawar; Katharine A Price; Joaquin J Garcia
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2020-04-29

7.  Prognostic and predictive parameters in breast pathology: a pathologist's primer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  The co-presence of high-risk human papillomaviruses and Epstein-Barr virus is linked with tumor grade and stage in Qatari women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ishita Gupta; Ayesha Jabeen; Reem Al-Sarraf; Hanan Farghaly; Semir Vranic; Ali A Sultan; Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa; Hamda Al-Thawadi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The impact of pre-analytical parameters on class II biomarkers by immunohistochemistry: concordance across four tissue processing protocols.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Samira Alminawi; Patrice Boulianne; Yan Ming Shang; Michelle R Downes; Elzbieta Slodkowska
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Young age at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in the Luminal A breast cancer subtype: a retrospective institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Zhiyang Liu; Zeyad Sahli; Yongchun Wang; Antonio C Wolff; Leslie M Cope; Christopher B Umbricht
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.