| Literature DB >> 29846100 |
Carmine Pinto1, Nicola Normanno2, Armando Orlandi3, Francesca Fenizia2, Angela Damato1, Evaristo Maiello4, Emiliano Tamburini5, Francesco Di Costanzo6, Giuseppe Tonini7, Domenico Bilancia8, Domenico Corsi9, Salvatore Pisconti10, Francesco Ferrau11, Stefania Gori12, Bruno Daniele13, Alberto Zaniboni14, Héctor Soto Parra15, Giovanni Luca Frassinetti16, Rosario Vincenzo Iaffaioli17, Antonio Cassata17, Maria Giulia Zampino18, Lazzaro Repetto19, Maria Alessandra Calegari3, Carlo Barone3.
Abstract
The optimal duration and intensity of first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients once they have achieved an objective response is controversial. In a molecularly selected RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) population, this concern is amplified. Once disease control has been achieved with a combination therapy including an anti-EGFR antibody, further exposure both to cytotoxic drugs and targeted therapy might result only in increased toxicity. In unresectable metastatic RAS and BRAF wt colorectal cancer patients, a deintensified therapy could represent a valuable option that might preserve quality of life. We designed a study to compare FOLFIRI/cetuximab to FOLFIRI/cetuximab for eight cycles followed by cetuximab alone in first-line treatment of RAS and BRAF (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: RAS and BRAF wild-type; cetuximab; colorectal cancer; de-escalation therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29846100 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Future Oncol ISSN: 1479-6694 Impact factor: 3.404