Literature DB >> 29846017

Long-term prognostic impact of surgical complications in the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94.

T Sprenger1, T Beißbarth2, R Sauer3, J Tschmelitsch4, R Fietkau3, T Liersch1, W Hohenberger5, L Staib6, J Gaedcke1, H-R Raab7, C Rödel8, M Ghadimi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of postoperative complications on survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing combined modality treatment is debatable. This study evaluated the impact of surgical complications on oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated within the randomized CAO/ARO/AIO-94 (Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society) trial.
METHODS: Patients were assigned randomly to either preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) or postoperative CRT between 1995 and 2002. Anastomotic leakage and wound healing disorders were evaluated prospectively, and their associations with overall survival, and distant metastasis and local recurrence rates after a long-term follow-up of more than 10 years were determined. Medical complications (such as cardiopulmonary events) were not analysed in this study.
RESULTS: A total of 799 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had anterior or intersphincteric resection had better 10-year overall survival than those treated with abdominoperineal resection (63·1 versus 51·3 per cent; P < 0·001). Anastomotic leakage was associated with worse 10-year overall survival (51 versus 65·2 per cent; P = 0·020). Overall survival was reduced in patients with impaired wound healing (45·7 versus 62·2 per cent; P = 0·009). At 10 years after treatment, patients developing any surgical complication (anastomotic leakage and/or wound healing disorder) had impaired overall survival (46·6 versus 63·8 per cent; P < 0·001), a lower distant metastasis-free survival rate (63·2 versus 72·0 per cent; P = 0·030) and more local recurrences (15·5 versus 6·4 per cent; P < 0·001). In a multivariable Cox regression model, lymph node metastases (P < 0·001) and surgical complications (P = 0·008) were the only independent predictors of reduced overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Surgical complications were associated with adverse oncological outcomes in this trial.
© 2018 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846017     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  15 in total

1.  "Watch and wait" approach in rectal cancer patients following complete clinical response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not compromise oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Ali Eba Demirbağ; Hasan Cem Mısırlıoğlu; Semih Sezer
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Does anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection worsen long-term oncologic outcome?

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Takeru Matsuda; Akira Arimoto; Kimihiro Yamashita; Masayasu Nishi; Nobuhisa Takase; Masayoshi Hosono; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The impact of anastomotic leak on long-term oncological outcomes after low anterior resection for mid-low rectal cancer: extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Quoc Riccardo Bao; Gianluca Pellino; Gaya Spolverato; Angelo Restivo; Simona Deidda; Giulia Capelli; Cesare Ruffolo; Francesco Bianco; Dajana Cuicchi; Elio Jovine; Raffaele Lombardi; Claudio Belluco; Antonio Amato; Filippo La Torre; Corrado Asteria; Aldo Infantino; Tania Contardo; Paola Del Bianco; Paolo Delrio; Salvatore Pucciarelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  New Anastomosis Technique to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Especially Upper Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Koji Ando; Naotaka Kuriyama; Yoshiaki Fujimoto; Tomoko Jogo; Kentaro Hokonohara; Qingjiang Hu; Yuichi Hisamatsu; Ryota Nakanishi; Yuichiro Nakashima; Yasue Kimura; Eiji Oki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  MRI pelvimetry-based evaluation of surgical difficulty in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for male rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jianhua Chen; Yanwu Sun; Pan Chi; Bin Sun
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Endovascular management of life threatening bleeding from a radiation induced internal iliac artery branch pseudoaneurysm.

Authors:  Abhijit Salaskar; Philip Blumenfeld; Joseph Calandra; Michael Hamblin
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2019-08-27

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative infective complications on oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  J Lawler; M Choynowski; K Bailey; M Bucholc; A Johnston; M Sugrue
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-06-11

8.  Early and late morbidity of local excision after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  B Teste; P Rouanet; J-J Tuech; A Valverde; B Lelong; M Rivoire; J-L Faucheron; M Jafari; G Portier; B Meunier; I Sielezneff; M Prudhomme; F Marchal; A Dubois; M Capdepont; Q Denost; E Rullier
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  Short-Course Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Maria Cambray; Javier Gonzalez-Viguera; Miguel Angel Berenguer; Miquel Macià; Ferran Losa; Gemma Soler; Ricard Frago; J Castellví; E Guinó
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Lei Niu; Jin Wang; Peng Zhang; Xiaomu Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.