| Literature DB >> 29845930 |
Elísia Lopes1,2, Tânia Fernandes1,2, Miguel P Machado1, João André Carriço1, José Melo-Cristino1, Mário Ramirez1, Elisabete R Martins1.
Abstract
We characterised Lancefield group B streptococcal (GBS) isolates causing invasive disease among non-pregnant adults in Portugal between 2009 and 2015. All isolates (n = 555) were serotyped, assigned to clonal complexes (CCs) by multilocus sequence typing and characterised by surface protein and pilus island gene profiling. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by disk diffusion and resistance genotypes identified by PCR. Overall, serotype Ia was most frequent in the population (31%), followed by serotypes Ib (24%) and V (18%). Serotype Ib increased significantly throughout the study period (p < 0.001) to become the most frequent serotype after 2013. More than 40% of isolates clustered in the CC1/alp3/PI-1+PI-2a genetic lineage, including most isolates of serotypes Ib (n = 110) and V (n = 65). Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance rates were 35% and 34%, respectively, both increasing from 2009 to 2015 (p < 0.010) and associated with CC1 and serotype Ib (p < 0.001). The Ib/CC1 lineage probably resulted from acquisition of the type Ib capsular operon in a single recombination event by a representative of the V/CC1 macrolide-resistant lineage. Expansion of the new serotype Ib/CC1 lineage resulted in increased macrolide resistance in GBS, causing invasive disease among adults in Portugal. The presence of this clone elsewhere may predict more widespread increase in resistance.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus agalactiae; antimicrobial resistance; bacterial infections; epidemiology; invasive streptococcal infections; molecular methods
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29845930 PMCID: PMC6152215 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.21.1700473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Euro Surveill ISSN: 1025-496X
Figure 1Number of group B streptococcal invasive infections, Portugal (24 hospitals), 2009–2015 (n = 555)
Figure 2Serotype distribution of group B streptococcal isolates, Portugal (24 hospitals), 2009–2015 (n = 555)
Distribution of sequence types, serotypes, surface protein and pilus genes of group B streptococcal isolates within clonal complexes, Portugal (24 hospitals), 2009–2015 (n = 555)
| CC/ST (n) | Serotype (n) | Alp gene (n) | Pilus (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ib (110), V (77), Ia (12), IV (5), II (3), VI (2), NT (15) | PI-1+PI-2a (209), PI-2a (12), PI-1+PI-2b (5), PI-2b (2) | ||
| Ib (3), Ia (2), NT (1) | PI-1+PI-2a (5), PI-2b (1) | ||
| Ia (1) | PI-1+PI-2b (1) | ||
| Ib (20), Ia (5), II (5), V (2), NT (5) | PI-1+PI-2a (37) | ||
| III (31), IV (1) | PI-1+PI-2b (29), PI-2b (3) | ||
| III (37), II (27), V (10), Ia (1), IV (1), VIII (1), NT (2) | PI-1+PI-2a (74), PI-2a (4), PI-1+PI-2b (1) | ||
| Ia (146), V (5), II (2), III (2), IV (2) | PI-2a (149), PI-1+PI-2a (7), PI-2b (1) | ||
| V (7) | None (7) | PI-2a (7) | |
| Ia (2) | PI-2b (2) | ||
| IX (8) | PI-2a (8) | ||
| V (1) | PI-1+PI-2a (1) |
Alp: alpha/alpha-like protein; CC: clonal complex; NT: non-typeable; ST: sequence type.
Distribution of antimicrobial resistance across group B streptococcal serotypes, Portugal (24 hospitals), 2009–2015 (n = 555a)
| Serotype | Macrolides | Tetracycline | Streptomycin | Other (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotype (n) | Genotype (n) | Genotype (n) | Genotype (n) | ||
| Ia | cMLSB (9), iMLSB (2), M (6) | CHL (1), LEV (2) | |||
| Ib | cMLSB (110), iMLSB (4) | ND | CHL (4) | ||
| II | iMLSB (2) | None | |||
| III | cMLSB (6), iMLSB (10) | CHL (3) | |||
| IV | None | ND | ND | None | |
| V | cMLSB (25), iMLSB (10) | ND | CHL (1) | ||
| VI | None | ND | ND | ND | LEV (1) |
| VIII | None | ND | ND | None | |
| IX | M (1) | ND | ND | CHL (1) | |
| NT | cMLSB (8), iMLSB (2) | ND | None | ||
CHL: chloramphenicol; LEV: levofloxacin; M: resistance to macrolides; MLSB: resistance to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins B with the prefix letter referring to the constitutive (cMLSB) or inducible (iMLSB) expression of this phenotype; ND: not determined (resistance genotypes were not determined for the susceptible isolates); NT: non-typeable.
a Only the isolates resistant to tested antimicrobial drugs are listed (n = 490).
Figure 3Macrolide and lincosamide resistance rates of group B streptococcal isolates, Portugal (24 hospitals), 2009–2015 (n = 555)
Figure 4Genomic comparison of group B streptococcal isolates Ib/ST1 (SH5446) and V/ST1 (SH4916) to the SS1 genome