Chin-An Yang1,2,3, Hsi-Yuan Huang1, Cheng-Li Lin4, Jan-Gowth Chang5,6. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, #2 Yude Road, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan, ROC. 2. Division of General Pediatrics, China Medical University Children's Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. 3. College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. 4. Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, #2 Yude Road, Taichung, 40447, Taiwan, ROC. d6781@mail.cmuh.org.tw. 6. College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. d6781@mail.cmuh.org.tw.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) is a key enzyme preventing cells from oxidative damage and has been reported to have tumor-promoting roles. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive values of G6PD on brain tumor risk, prognosis and chemo-resistance. METHODS: A retrospective 13-year cohort study analyzing cancer risk using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (4066 G6PD deficiency patients and 16,264 controls) was conducted. Furthermore, RNAseq and clinical data of grade II-III glioma (LGG, n = 515) and glioblastoma (GBM, n = 155) were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and analyzed. Bioinformatics methods were applied to build a glioma prognostication model and to predict response to chemotherapy based on tumor G6PD-related gene expressions. The predicted results were validated in another glioma cohort GSE 16011 and in KALS1 cell line. RESULTS: G6PD-dificient patients were found to have an increased risk for cancers, especially for brain tumor (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 10.5, 95% CI 1.03-7.60). Furthermore, higher tumor G6PD expression was associated with poor patient survival in LGG, but not in GBM. A prognostication model using expression levels of G6PD and 9 related genes (PSMA2, PSMB8, SHFM1, GSS, GSTK1, MGST2, POLD3, MSH2, MSH6) could independently predict LGG patient survival. Boosted decision tree analysis on 213 cancer cell line database revealed predictive values of G6PD expression on response to gemcitabine and bortezomib. Knockdown of G6PD in KALS1 cell line enhanced its sensitivity to both chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that G6PD could be a marker predicting glioma risk, prognosis and chemo-sensitivity.
PURPOSE:Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) is a key enzyme preventing cells from oxidative damage and has been reported to have tumor-promoting roles. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the predictive values of G6PD on brain tumor risk, prognosis and chemo-resistance. METHODS: A retrospective 13-year cohort study analyzing cancer risk using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (4066 G6PD deficiencypatients and 16,264 controls) was conducted. Furthermore, RNAseq and clinical data of grade II-III glioma (LGG, n = 515) and glioblastoma (GBM, n = 155) were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and analyzed. Bioinformatics methods were applied to build a glioma prognostication model and to predict response to chemotherapy based on tumorG6PD-related gene expressions. The predicted results were validated in another glioma cohort GSE 16011 and in KALS1 cell line. RESULTS:G6PD-dificient patients were found to have an increased risk for cancers, especially for brain tumor (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 10.5, 95% CI 1.03-7.60). Furthermore, higher tumorG6PD expression was associated with poor patient survival in LGG, but not in GBM. A prognostication model using expression levels of G6PD and 9 related genes (PSMA2, PSMB8, SHFM1, GSS, GSTK1, MGST2, POLD3, MSH2, MSH6) could independently predict LGG patient survival. Boosted decision tree analysis on 213 cancer cell line database revealed predictive values of G6PD expression on response to gemcitabine and bortezomib. Knockdown of G6PD in KALS1 cell line enhanced its sensitivity to both chemotherapeutic agents. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that G6PD could be a marker predicting glioma risk, prognosis and chemo-sensitivity.
Authors: Michelle M Kim; Sandra Camelo-Piragua; Matthew Schipper; Yebin Tao; Daniel Normolle; Larry Junck; Aaron Mammoser; Bryan L Betz; Yue Cao; Christopher J Kim; Jason Heth; Oren Sagher; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina I Tsien Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Klaus Felix; Lynne D Rockwood; Walter Pretsch; Jagadeesan Nair; Helmut Bartsch; Georg Wilhelm Bornkamm; Siegfried Janz Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Zhen Yang; Yi Shen; Hisashi Oishi; Eric L Matteson; Lu Tian; Jörg J Goronzy; Cornelia M Weyand Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Yiping Huang; Lauren N Bell; Jun Okamura; Myoung Soo Kim; Robert P Mohney; Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Edward A Ratovitski Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Sophie E M Veldhuijzen van Zanten; Fatma E El-Khouly; Marc H A Jansen; Dewi P Bakker; Esther Sanchez Aliaga; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Nicole I Wolf; C Michel Zwaan; W Peter Vandertop; Dannis G van Vuurden; Gertjan J L Kaspers Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.130