Literature DB >> 29845330

Changes in arterial pressure hemodynamics in response to renal nerve stimulation both before and after renal denervation.

Annemiek F Hoogerwaard1, Ahmet Adiyaman1, Mark R de Jong1, Jaap Jan J Smit1, Peter Paul H M Delnoy1, Jan-Evert Heeg2, Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt3, Anand R Ramdat Misier1, Michiel Rienstra4, Arif Elvan5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal nerve denervation (RDN) is developed as a potential treatment for hypertension. Recently, we reported the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to localize sympathetic nerve tissue for subsequent selective RDN. The effects of RNS on arterial pressure dynamics remain unknown. The current study aimed to describe the acute changes in arterial pressure dynamics response to RNS before and after RDN. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty six patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia before and after RDN. We continuously monitored heart rate (HR) and invasive femoral blood pressure (BP). Augmentation pressure (AP) and index (Aix), pulse pressure (PP), time to reflected wave, maximum systolic BP and dicrotic notch were calculated. Systolic and diastolic BP at site of maximum response significantly increased in response to RNS (120 ± 16/62 ± 9 to 150 ± 22/75 ± 15 mmHg) (p < 0.001/< 0.001), whereas after RDN no RNS-induced BP change was observed (p > 0.10). RNS increased Aix (29 ± 11 to 32 ± 13%, p = 0.005), PP (59 ± 14 to 75 ± 17 mmHg, p < 0.001), time to reflected wave (63 ± 18 to 71 ± 25 ms, p = 0.004) and time to maximum systolic pressure (167 ± 36 to 181 ± 46 ms, p = 0.004) before RDN, whereas no changes were observed after RDN (p > 0.18). All changes were BP dependent. RNS had no influence on HR or the time to dicrotic notch (p > 0.12).  
CONCLUSION: RNS induces temporary rises in Aix, PP, time to maximum systolic pressure and time to reflected wave. These changes are BP dependent and were completely blunted after RDN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial pressure dynamics; Augmentation index; Renal nerve denervation; Renal nerve stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29845330     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-018-1287-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  28 in total

1.  Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness.

Authors:  Ian B Wilkinson; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Sian Tyrrell; Ian R Hall; David J Webb; Vince E Paul; Terry Levy; John R Cockcroft
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 2.  Should the augmentation index be normalized to heart rate?

Authors:  Lee Stoner; James Faulkner; Andrew Lowe; Danielle M Lambrick; Joanna M Young; Richard Love; David S Rowlands
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.928

3.  Blood pressure and autonomic responses to electrical stimulation of the renal arterial nerves before and after ablation of the renal artery.

Authors:  Masaomi Chinushi; Daisuke Izumi; Kenichi Iijima; Katsuya Suzuki; Hiroshi Furushima; Osamu Saitoh; Yui Furuta; Yoshifusa Aizawa; Mitsuya Iwafuchi
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Renal Nerve Stimulation-Induced Blood Pressure Changes Predict Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response After Renal Denervation.

Authors:  Mark R de Jong; Ahmet Adiyaman; Pim Gal; Jaap Jan J Smit; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Jan-Evert Heeg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Elizabeth O Y Lau; Alexandre Persu; Jan A Staessen; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Jonathan S Steinberg; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Renal nerve stimulation identifies aorticorenal innervation and prevents inadvertent ablation of vagal nerves during renal denervation.

Authors:  Mark R de Jong; Annemiek F Hoogerwaard; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jaap Jan J Smit; Jan-Evert Heeg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Arif Elvan
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population.

Authors:  J P Gerber; G N Williams; C R Scoville; R A Arciero; D C Taylor
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Selective proximal renal denervation guided by autonomic responses evoked via high-frequency stimulation in a preclinical canine model.

Authors:  Jiayi Lu; Zhenglong Wang; Tingquan Zhou; Shaojie Chen; Weijie Chen; Huaan Du; Zhen Tan; Hanxuan Yang; Xinyu Hu; Chang Liu; Zhiyu Ling; Zengzhang Liu; Bernhard Zrenner; Kamsang Woo; Yuehui Yin
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Comparison of the effects of antihypertensive agents on central blood pressure and arterial stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  Isla S Mackenzie; Carmel M McEniery; Zahid Dhakam; Morris J Brown; John R Cockcroft; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Pulse pressure, arterial stiffness and wave reflections (augmentation index) as cardiovascular risk factors in hypertension.

Authors:  Michel E Safar
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-02

10.  Central wave reflection is associated with peripheral arterial resistance in addition to arterial stiffness in subjects without antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  Matias Wilenius; Antti J Tikkakoski; Anna M Tahvanainen; Antti Haring; Jenni Koskela; Heini Huhtala; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of baroreflex activation therapy on renal sodium excretion in patients with resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Mark Lipphardt; Michael J Koziolek; Luca-Yves Lehnig; Ann-Kathrin Schäfer; Gerhard A Müller; Stephan Lüders; Manuel Wallbach
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Long-term effects of baroreflex activation therapy: 2-year follow-up data of the BAT Neo system.

Authors:  Manuel Wallbach; Ellen Born; Deborah Kämpfer; Stephan Lüders; Gerhard A Müller; Rolf Wachter; Michael J Koziolek
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  A drug-induced hypotensive challenge to verify catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation in an obese hypertensive swine model.

Authors:  Lucas Lauder; L Boyce Moon; Catherine A Pipenhagen; Sebastian Ewen; Jeffrey M Fish; Renu Virmani; James A Jensen; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.