BACKGROUND: Renal nerve denervation (RDN) is developed as a potential treatment for hypertension. Recently, we reported the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to localize sympathetic nerve tissue for subsequent selective RDN. The effects of RNS on arterial pressure dynamics remain unknown. The current study aimed to describe the acute changes in arterial pressure dynamics response to RNS before and after RDN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty six patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia before and after RDN. We continuously monitored heart rate (HR) and invasive femoral blood pressure (BP). Augmentation pressure (AP) and index (Aix), pulse pressure (PP), time to reflected wave, maximum systolic BP and dicrotic notch were calculated. Systolic and diastolic BP at site of maximum response significantly increased in response to RNS (120 ± 16/62 ± 9 to 150 ± 22/75 ± 15 mmHg) (p < 0.001/< 0.001), whereas after RDN no RNS-induced BP change was observed (p > 0.10). RNS increased Aix (29 ± 11 to 32 ± 13%, p = 0.005), PP (59 ± 14 to 75 ± 17 mmHg, p < 0.001), time to reflected wave (63 ± 18 to 71 ± 25 ms, p = 0.004) and time to maximum systolic pressure (167 ± 36 to 181 ± 46 ms, p = 0.004) before RDN, whereas no changes were observed after RDN (p > 0.18). All changes were BP dependent. RNS had no influence on HR or the time to dicrotic notch (p > 0.12). CONCLUSION: RNS induces temporary rises in Aix, PP, time to maximum systolic pressure and time to reflected wave. These changes are BP dependent and were completely blunted after RDN.
BACKGROUND:Renal nerve denervation (RDN) is developed as a potential treatment for hypertension. Recently, we reported the use of renal nerve stimulation (RNS) to localize sympathetic nerve tissue for subsequent selective RDN. The effects of RNS on arterial pressure dynamics remain unknown. The current study aimed to describe the acute changes in arterial pressure dynamics response to RNS before and after RDN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty six patients with drug-resistant hypertension referred for RDN were included. RNS was performed under general anesthesia before and after RDN. We continuously monitored heart rate (HR) and invasive femoral blood pressure (BP). Augmentation pressure (AP) and index (Aix), pulse pressure (PP), time to reflected wave, maximum systolic BP and dicrotic notch were calculated. Systolic and diastolic BP at site of maximum response significantly increased in response to RNS (120 ± 16/62 ± 9 to 150 ± 22/75 ± 15 mmHg) (p < 0.001/< 0.001), whereas after RDN no RNS-induced BP change was observed (p > 0.10). RNS increased Aix (29 ± 11 to 32 ± 13%, p = 0.005), PP (59 ± 14 to 75 ± 17 mmHg, p < 0.001), time to reflected wave (63 ± 18 to 71 ± 25 ms, p = 0.004) and time to maximum systolic pressure (167 ± 36 to 181 ± 46 ms, p = 0.004) before RDN, whereas no changes were observed after RDN (p > 0.18). All changes were BP dependent. RNS had no influence on HR or the time to dicrotic notch (p > 0.12). CONCLUSION:RNS induces temporary rises in Aix, PP, time to maximum systolic pressure and time to reflected wave. These changes are BP dependent and were completely blunted after RDN.
Authors: Ian B Wilkinson; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Sian Tyrrell; Ian R Hall; David J Webb; Vince E Paul; Terry Levy; John R Cockcroft Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Lee Stoner; James Faulkner; Andrew Lowe; Danielle M Lambrick; Joanna M Young; Richard Love; David S Rowlands Journal: J Atheroscler Thromb Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.928
Authors: Mark R de Jong; Ahmet Adiyaman; Pim Gal; Jaap Jan J Smit; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Jan-Evert Heeg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Elizabeth O Y Lau; Alexandre Persu; Jan A Staessen; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Jonathan S Steinberg; Arif Elvan Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Mark R de Jong; Annemiek F Hoogerwaard; Ahmet Adiyaman; Jaap Jan J Smit; Jan-Evert Heeg; Boudewijn A A M van Hasselt; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Arif Elvan Journal: Blood Press Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.835
Authors: Isla S Mackenzie; Carmel M McEniery; Zahid Dhakam; Morris J Brown; John R Cockcroft; Ian B Wilkinson Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Matias Wilenius; Antti J Tikkakoski; Anna M Tahvanainen; Antti Haring; Jenni Koskela; Heini Huhtala; Mika Kähönen; Tiit Kööbi; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Mark Lipphardt; Michael J Koziolek; Luca-Yves Lehnig; Ann-Kathrin Schäfer; Gerhard A Müller; Stephan Lüders; Manuel Wallbach Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Manuel Wallbach; Ellen Born; Deborah Kämpfer; Stephan Lüders; Gerhard A Müller; Rolf Wachter; Michael J Koziolek Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Lucas Lauder; L Boyce Moon; Catherine A Pipenhagen; Sebastian Ewen; Jeffrey M Fish; Renu Virmani; James A Jensen; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 6.138