| Literature DB >> 29845026 |
Marziyeh Vahid Dastjerdi1, Bita Eslami2, Maryam Alsadat Sharifi1, Ashraf Moini1, Leila Bayani3, Hoda Mohammad Khani4, Sadaf Alipour2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phytoestrogens treatment to relieve hot flushes in menopausal women was considered recently. However, the actual effectiveness and safety are not clear.Entities:
Keywords: Breast tissue; Endometrial thickness; Hot flushes; Isoflavone
Year: 2018 PMID: 29845026 PMCID: PMC5971175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Breast examination categorization
| Nodalarity | No | One Localized | Multiple Localized | Diffuse |
| Breast Thickenings | No | One Localized | Multiple Localized | Bilateral |
| Nipple Discharge | No | One duct | Multiple Ducts | Bilateral |
Fig. 1:CONSORT Flow diagram for patient recruitment
Basal characteristics of study population
| Age (yr) | 51.5±1.5 | 51.8±1.7 | 0.18 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7±2.3 | 25.1±2.1 | 0.20 |
| Age of menopause (yr) | 47.6±3.1 | 47.3±2.4 | 0.44 |
| Duration of menopause (yr) | 2.7±1.9 | 2.9±1.7 | 0.43 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P-value refers to student t-test
Clinical symptoms and sonographic evaluation of both group with 102 patients inT0 (baseline), T1 (after 6 wk), T2 (after 12 wk)
| - | 27 | 29 | 39 | 33 | 45 | 30 |
| - | 65 | 62 | 57 | 60 | 50 | 59 |
| - | 10 | 11 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 13 |
| 0.30 | ||||||
| - | 32 | 29 | 41 | 30 | 48 | 28 |
| - | 58 | 60 | 53 | 60 | 51 | 64 |
| - | 12 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 10 |
| 0.43 | ||||||
| 3.4±1.9 | 3.3±1.95 | 3.2±1.78 | 3.2±1.6 | 2.9±1.4 | 3.00±1.5 | |
| 0.23 | 0.36 | 0.73 | ||||
| - | 91 | 93 | 95 | 96 | 96 | 98 |
| - | 11 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.47 | 0.58 | 0.63 | ||||
Data are expressed as number. P-values refer to chi-square test, Fisher's exact test or student t-test when appropriate
Breast examination results in T0 (baseline), T1 (after 6 wk), T2 (after 12 wk)
| Normal | 86 | 89 | 90 | 89 | 92 | 91 |
| One localized | 9 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 8 |
| Multiple Localized | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Bilateral | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.32 | ||||
| No Nodule | 95 | 92 | 95 | 89 | 97 | 90 |
| One localized Nodule | 5 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 8 |
| Multiple Localized Nodules | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Bilateral Nodules | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.43 | ||||
| 90 | 92 | 93 | 91 | 96 | 91 | |
| Low Tenderness | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Medium Tenderness | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| High Tenderness | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.31 | ||||
| No Discharge | 88 | 90 | 91 | 89 | 91 | 93 |
| One Duct Discharge | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| Multiple Ducts Discharge | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Bilateral Discharge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.26 | ||||
Data are expressed as number. P-values refer to chi-square test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate