| Literature DB >> 29845023 |
Yat Yen1,2, Yumin Shi1, Bunly Soeung3, Rathny Suy1, Muhammad Tayyab Sohail4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined the current prevalence of substance abuse and sexual behaviors among junior high school students and the relationships between substance abuse, sexual behaviors, and victimization using multiple mediations.Entities:
Keywords: Cambodia; Sexual behaviors; Substance abuse; Victimization
Year: 2018 PMID: 29845023 PMCID: PMC5971172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig. 1:The conceptual models of mediated pathways of AL to SB and Vict
Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents
| 755 (44.3) | 948 (55.7) | 1703 (100) | 1.56 | 2.00 | .497 | ||
| Grade | 7 | 319 (44.7) | 393 (55.3) | 712 (41.8) | 1.85 | 8.00 | .814 |
| 8 | 236 (43.9) | 301 (56.1) | 537 (31.5) | ||||
| 9 | 200 (44.1) | 254 (55.9) | 454 (26.7) | ||||
| Age (yr) | ≤11 | 2 (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 6 (0.4) | 14.46 | 14.00 | 1.344 |
| 12 | 12 (19.0) | 51 (81.0) | 63 (3.7) | ||||
| 13 | 153 (42.7) | 204 (57.3) | 357 (21.0) | ||||
| 14 | 225 (43.5) | 292 (56.5) | 517 (30.4) | ||||
| 15 | 185 (44.3) | 233 (55.7) | 418 (24.5) | ||||
| 16 | 98 (46.0) | 115 (54.0) | 213 (12.5) | ||||
| 17 | 50 (61.7) | 31 (38.3) | 81 (4.8) | ||||
| ≥18 | 30 (62.5) | 18 (37.5) | 48 (2.8) | ||||
Note: N= total samples, %=percentage of male or female students for each grade and age category, Mean= mean value, Md=median, SD=standard deviation
Proportions of AL, SB, Drug, and Vict categorized by age, grade, and gender
| Had alcohol | No | 5 | 58 | 318 | 449 | 341 | 170 | 61 | 30 | 619 | 449 | 364 | 585 | 847 | 1432 (84.09) | 1.00 | 1.14 | .349 |
| Yes | 1 | 5 | 39 | 68 | 77 | 43 | 20 | 18 | 93 | 88 | 90 | 170 | 101 | 271 (15.91) | ||||
| Had ever used drugs | No | 5 | 63 | 350 | 499 | 404 | 204 | 80 | 46 | 689 | 515 | 447 | 727 | 924 | 1651 (96.95) | 1.00 | 1.11 | .318 |
| Yes | 1 | 0 | 7 | 18 | 14 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 22 | 7 | 28 | 24 | 52 (3.05) | ||||
| Ever had sex | No | 5 | 58 | 322 | 455 | 364 | 177 | 73 | 37 | 623 | 463 | 405 | 639 | 852 | 1491 (87.55) | 1.00 | 1.02 | .155 |
| Yes | 1 | 5 | 35 | 62 | 54 | 36 | 8 | 11 | 89 | 74 | 49 | 116 | 96 | 212 (12.45) | ||||
| Victim of bullying in past 30 d | No | 4 | 52 | 281 | 398 | 325 | 170 | 58 | 37 | 548 | 419 | 358 | 580 | 745 | 1325 (77.80) | 1.00 | 1.21 | .406 |
| Yes | 2 | 11 | 76 | 119 | 93 | 43 | 23 | 11 | 164 | 118 | 96 | 175 | 203 | 378 (22.20) | ||||
| Victim of attacks in past 12 months. | No | 4 | 51 | 277 | 407 | 341 | 169 | 59 | 38 | 541 | 436 | 369 | 564 | 782 | 1346 (79.04) | 1.00 | 1.19 | .396 |
| Yes | 2 | 12 | 80 | 110 | 77 | 44 | 22 | 10 | 171 | 101 | 85 | 191 | 166 | 357 (20.96) | ||||
| Victim of fights in past 12 months | No | 5 | 55 | 297 | 447 | 362 | 183 | 62 | 44 | 584 | 475 | 396 | 612 | 843 | 1455 (85.44) | 1.00 | 1.14 | .345 |
| Yes | 1 | 8 | 60 | 70 | 56 | 30 | 19 | 4 | 128 | 62 | 58 | 143 | 105 | 248 (14.56) | ||||
| Victim of injuries in past 12 months | No | 6 | 54 | 295 | 412 | 323 | 158 | 57 | 35 | 565 | 406 | 369 | 578 | 762 | 1340 (78.68) | 1.00 | 1.20 | .401 |
| Yes | 0 | 9 | 62 | 105 | 95 | 55 | 24 | 13 | 147 | 131 | 85 | 177 | 186 | 363 (21.32) | ||||
| Victim of suicide attempt in past 12months | No | 6 | 63 | 344 | 488 | 399 | 193 | 74 | 44 | 675 | 511 | 425 | 721 | 890 | 1611 (94.60) | 1.00 | 1.05 | .214 |
| Yes | 0 | 0 | 12 | 25 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 32 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 53 | 86 (5.05) | ||||
Note: Md=median, M=mean, SD=standard deviation. N (%) = a total response that respondents answered “yes/no” to each question
Multiple mediators of effects of AL on SB and Vict through Drug
| (H1) | AL→Drug | 0.086 | 0.015 | 5.882 | 0.0000 | 0.023 | 3.160 | 0.011–0.040 | 0.031–0.104 | 24.10 | |
| Drug→SB | 0.271 | 0.071 | 3.799 | 0.0001 | |||||||
| ALind.→SB | 0.073 | 0.019 | 3.975 | 0.0001 | |||||||
| ALdir.→SB | 0.097 | 0.019 | 5.069 | 0.0000 | |||||||
| (H2) | AL→Drug | 0.086 | 0.015 | 5.882 | 0.0000 | 0.017 | 3.092 | 0.008–0.030 | 0.017–0.060 | 10.80 | |
| Drug→Vict | 0.198 | 0.054 | 3.687 | 0.0002 | |||||||
| ALind.→Vict | 0.140 | 0.014 | 9.724 | 0.0000 | |||||||
| ALdir.→Vict | 0.157 | 0.014 | 10.912 | 0.0000 | |||||||
| (H3) | AL→SB | 0.097 | 0.019 | 5.069 | 0.0000 | 0.014 | 2.495 | 0.006–0.023 | 0.013–0.048 | 8.80 | |
| SB→Vict | 0.143 | 0.049 | 2.922 | 0.0003 | |||||||
| ALind.→Vict | 0.143 | 0.014 | 9.979 | 0.0000 | |||||||
| ALdir.→Vict | 0.157 | 0.014 | 10.912 | 0.0000 | |||||||
Note: PM is a ratio of indirect effect to total effects of X→Y. s.e=Standard deviation Error; Est=Estimated effect that is deducted from direct effect by indirect effect; Dir. and Ind.= Direct and indirect effects; t= t-value; P=P-value (*.P<.05; **.P<.01; ***. P<.001); BC=bias corrected; BCa=bias corrected accelerated; 5000 bootstrap samples
Fig. 2:Mediations illustration: a, bAL predicted SB and Vict indirectly mediated by Drug; cAL predicted Vict indirectly mediated by SB. **. P<.01; ***, P<.001