| Literature DB >> 29844687 |
Pablo Mandó1, Manglio Rizzo2, María Paula Roberti1, Estefanía Paula Juliá1, María Betina Pampena1, Constanza Pérez de la Puente2, Carlos Martín Loza2, Carolina Ponce2, Jorge Nadal2, Federico Andres Coló2, José Mordoh1,2,3, Estrella Mariel Levy1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease presenting a broad range of clinical and molecular characteristics. In the past years, a growing body of evidence demonstrated that immune response plays a significant role in cancer outcome. However, immune prognostic markers are not completely validated in clinical practice in BC patients.Entities:
Keywords: breast neoplasm; lymphocytes; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; prognostic factors
Year: 2018 PMID: 29844687 PMCID: PMC5961634 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S160911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristics | Number (%) |
|---|---|
| Number of patients | 85 |
| Follow-up (months) | 38.6 (29.4–60.1) |
| Age (years) | 56 (44–66) |
| Breast tumor size (cm) | 1.7 (1.15–2.9) |
| Stage at diagnosis | |
| I | 49 (57.7) |
| II | 29 (34.1) |
| III | 7 (8.2) |
| Histologic subtypes | |
| Ductal | 67 (78.8) |
| Lobular | 12 (14.1) |
| Ductolobular | 5 (5.9) |
| Other | 1 (1.2) |
| Histologic grade | |
| 1 | 19 (22.4) |
| 2 | 45 (52.9) |
| 3 | 21 (24.7) |
| Hormonal receptors | |
| Estrogen receptor | 67 (43–88) |
| Progesterone receptor | 50 (5–70) |
| Ki67 (n:76) | 9 (5–16) |
| High (>20) | 11 (14.5) |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 51 (59.3) |
| Tumor phenotype | |
| Luminal A | 50 (58.8) |
| Luminal B | 20 (23.5) |
| Luminal HER2 | 6 (7.1) |
| HER2 | 4 (4.7) |
| Triple negative | 5 (5.9) |
| Lymph nodes metastasis | 32 (37.6) |
| Postsurgical treatment | |
| Hormonotherapy | 70 (82.4) |
| Chemotherapy | 47 (55.3) |
Note:
Median number (interquartile range).
Univariate analysis of clinical and pathological characteristics associated with recurrence
| Characteristic | RR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Positive axillary lymph nodes | 3.53 (1.19–10.43) | 0.014 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 8.25 (1.12–60.76) | 0.007 |
| TNM stage (2–3 vs 1) | 3.23 (1.09–9.60) | 0.024 |
| Tumor size (≤2 cm vs >2 cm) | 2.08 (0.78–5.59) | 0.14 |
| Histologic grade (3 vs 1–2) | 1.78 (0.66–4.82) | 0.26 |
| Luminal phenotype | 1.33 (0.33–5.38) | 0.68 |
| Ki67 (≥20% vs <20%) | 1.81 (0.56–5.85) | 0.39 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
Figure 1Total lymphocytes and T lymphocytes differences in R and NR patients.
Notes: Bars show median PB cells absolute number (upper panel) and percentage (lower panel), from R (gray) and NR (white) patients. Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed. Significant p-values are shown in the graph.
Abbreviations: NR, nonrelapsed; PB, peripheral blood; R, relapsed.
Figure 2NLR association with DFS.
Notes: NLR variable was dichotomized as high (≥2) or low (<2). Patients with a NLR ≥2 presented a significantly lower DFS (5-year DFS: 100% vs 69.55%, p=0.048) and a tendency toward higher recurrence risk (p=0.058). Significant p-value is shown in the graph. Low NLR is depicted with a red line and high NLR with a black line.
Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 3NK cells analysis in R and NR patients.
Notes: (A) Bars show median NK cells and NKT cells absolute number (up) and percentage (down) from R (gray) and NR (white) patients. There is no difference between R and NR patients. (B) Patients were classified as CD69 “high” or “low” expression in relation to population median (1.7%). NK cells from R patients expressed lower CD69 than NR (p=0.047). This association was also reflected in DFS (5-year DFS high 87.70% vs low 63.75%, p=0.045). χ2 and log rank test were performed, respectively. Significant p-value is shown in the graph. In Kaplan–Meier curve, CD69 high was depicted with a red line and CD69 low with a black one.
Abbreviations: DFS, disease-free survival; NK, natural killer; NR, nonrelapsed; R, relapsed.