| Literature DB >> 29844656 |
Tomoki Sato1, Takahiro Kawaji1, Akira Hirata2, Takanori Mizoguchi3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 360-degree suture trabeculotomy (360S-LOT) ab interno for treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Risk factors of surgical failure were examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 360S-LOT ab interno alone was performed for patients with uncontrolled OAG, and combined 360S-LOT ab interno/phacoemulsification was performed for patients with controlled OAG with a visually significant cataract between March 2014 and September 2015 at a single center. The patients were prospectively followed for 2 years. The main outcome measures included 2-year intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications used, postoperative complications, and predictive factors of surgical failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, with surgical success (with or without medication use) defined as postoperative IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20% (criterion A) or IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30% (criterion B). Predictive factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard ratios.Entities:
Keywords: 360-degree suture trabeculotomy ab interno; minimally invasive glaucoma surgery; open-angle glaucoma; phacoemulsification
Year: 2018 PMID: 29844656 PMCID: PMC5963827 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S161238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Preoperative demographic and ocular characteristics of patients undergoing 360S-LOT ab interno
| Characteristics | All patients | 360S-LOT ab interno | 360S-LOT ab interno with PEA + IOL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n, patients/eyes | 64/64 | 19/19 | 45/45 | NA |
| Age, years | 73.9 ± 8.7 (55–90) | 72.4 ± 8.3 (59–90) | 74.5 ± 8.9 (55–90) | 0.396 |
| Male/female | 27/37 | 7/12 | 20/25 | 0.390 |
| Preoperative IOP, mmHg | 18.3 ± 3.4 (11–31) | 18.9 ± 2.6 (13–24) | 18.1 ± 3.2 (11–31) | 0.376 |
| Number of medications | 1.6 ± 1.5 (0–4) | 3.3 ± 0.7 (2–4) | 0.9 ± 1.2 (0–4) | <0.001 |
| Phakic/pseudophakic | 58/6 | 13/6 | 45/0 | <0.001 |
| LogMAR BCVA | 0.28 ± 0.35 | 0.06 ± 0.16 | 0.38 ± 0.37 | 0.001 |
| Visual field MD, dB | −9.8 ± 6.7 | −11.0 ± 6.3 | −9.3 ± 6.9 | 0.358 |
| Corneal endothelial cell density, cells/mm2 | 2,578.1 ± 303.6 | 2,500.1 ± 344.9 | 2,609.3 ± 283.5 | 0.200 |
| Type of glaucoma, n (%) | 0.046 | |||
| POAG | 28 (44) | 11 (58) | 17 (38) | |
| NTG | 20 (31) | 2 (11) | 18 (40) | |
| XFG | 16 (25) | 6 (32) | 10 (22) | |
| Previous surgical or laser treatment, n (%) | 10 (16) | 9 (47) | 1 (2) | <0.001 |
| Cataract extraction | 6 (9) | 6 (32) | 0 (0) | |
| Scleral buckle | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | |
| Selective laser trabeculoplasty | 3 (5) | 3 (16) | 0 (0) |
Note: Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD (range).
Abbreviations: 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant; NA, not applicable; IOP, intraocular pressure; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; MD, mean deviation; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; NTG, normal tension glaucoma; XFG, exfoliation glaucoma.
IOP and number of anti-glaucoma medications used in patients who underwent 360S-LOT ab interno
| All patients | 360S-LOT ab interno alone | 360S-LOT ab interno with PEA + IOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n, patients/eyes | 50/50 | 17/17 | 33/33 | NA |
| IOP (mmHg) | ||||
| Before surgery | 18.4 ± 2.9 | 19.1 ± 2.2 | 18.1 ± 3.2 | 0.228 |
| 1 day | 17.8 ± 11.3 | 15.7 ± 6.4 | 18.9 ± 13.1 | 0.176 |
| 1 week | 16.6 ± 8.0 | 19.4 ± 9.0 | 15.2 ± 7.1 | 0.078 |
| 1 month | 13.5 ± 3.3 | 15.1 ± 4.0 | 12.7 ± 2.6 | 0.012 |
| 3 months | 13.3 ± 3.1 | 15.2 ± 3.4 | 12.3 ± 2.5 | 0.002 |
| 6 months | 13.0 ± 3.7 | 14.6 ± 4.1 | 12.1 ± 3.1 | 0.022 |
| 12 months | 13.4 ± 3.5 | 14.9 ± 3.0 | 12.7 ± 3.6 | 0.034 |
| 24 months | 13.4 ± 3.0 | 14.6 ± 2.9 | 12.7 ± 2.9 | 0.032 |
| 12-month IOP reduction | 26.7% ± 17.6% | 21.6% ± 15.8% | 29.3% ± 18.2% | 0.151 |
| 24-month IOP reduction | 26.9% ± 15.3% | 23.0% ± 14.7% | 28.9% ± 15.5% | 0.200 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma medications | ||||
| Before surgery | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | <0.001 |
| 12 months | 0.9 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | <0.001 |
| 24 months | 1.3 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 1.4 | 0.8 ± 1.3 | 0.002 |
Notes: The IOP and number of anti-glaucoma medications are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P-value for the IOP calculated using a paired t-test. P-value for number of anti-glaucoma medications calculated using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant; NA, not applicable.
Figure 1Plot of postoperative IOP at 24 months versus preoperative IOP in eyes that underwent the 360S-LOT ab interno procedure with (○) and without (●) PEA + IOL.
Notes: Most eyes had a reduction in IOP following surgery regardless of the procedure performed. Lines representing no IOP change (—), a 20% IOP reduction (….), and a 30% IOP reduction (----) are shown for reference.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival curves for surgical success using (A) criterion A (IOP between 6 and 15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%) and (B) criterion B (IOP between 6 and 12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%).
Notes: Criteria were applied independent of anti-glaucoma medication use. Two-years after surgery, the success rates using criteria A and B were 49.2% and 16.0%, respectively. Lines representing all patients (—) and 360S-LOT ab interno with (….) and without (----) PEA + IOL are shown for reference.
Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant.
Univariable analysis of risk factors for 360S-LOT ab interno
| Variable | No. of eyes | Criterion A for surgical success
| Criterion B for surgical success
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-Year probability of success | 2-Year probability of success | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.087 | 0.232 | |||
| >75 | 31 | 60.7 | 27.4 | ||
| ≤75 | 33 | 38.3 | 6.1 | ||
| Preoperative IOP (mmHg) | 0.644 | 0.702 | |||
| >18 | 32 | 52.5 | 20.3 | ||
| ≤18 | 32 | 46.3 | 12.5 | ||
| Number of anti-glaucoma medications | 0.027 | 0.165 | |||
| ≥2 | 33 | 36.1 | 15.2 | ||
| <2 | 31 | 63.5 | 17.5 | ||
| Sex | 0.110 | 0.352 | |||
| Male | 27 | 62.5 | 19.6 | ||
| Female | 37 | 40.1 | 13.5 | ||
| Type of glaucoma | 0.300 | 0.520 | |||
| POAG | 28 | 39 | 13.4 | ||
| NTG | 20 | 58.2 | 11.4 | ||
| XFG | 16 | 55.6 | 25 | ||
| Lens status | 0.465 | 0.618 | |||
| Phakia | 58 | 50.8 | 14.1 | ||
| Pseudophakia | 6 | 33.3 | 33.3 | ||
| Past history | 0.053 | 0.247 | |||
| None | 55 | 53.5 | 14.8 | ||
| Intraocular surgeries | 7 | 28.6 | 28.6 | ||
| Selective laser trabeculoplasty | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| With/without PEA + IOL | 0.043 | 0.070 | |||
| 360S-LOT ab interno alone | 19 | 31.6 | 10.5 | ||
| 360S-LOT ab interno with PEA + IOL | 45 | 56.4 | 18.2 | ||
Note: P-values were based on log-rank test.
Abbreviations: 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; IOP, intraocular pressure; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; NTG, normal tension glaucoma; XFG, exfoliation glaucoma; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant.
Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional HR model analysis for 360S-LOT ab interno (criterion A)
| Variable | Criterion A for surgical success
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk ratio | 95% CI | ||
| Age (years) | 0.97 | 0.94–1.01 | 0.143 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma medications | 1.34 | 0.98–1.83 | 0.077 |
| Sex | 0.255 | ||
| Male | 1 | ||
| Female | 1.57 | 0.73–3.58 | |
| Past history | 0.560 | ||
| None | 1 | ||
| Intraocular surgeries | 1.66 | 0.50–4.76 | 0.383 |
| Selective laser trabeculoplasty | 1.94 | 0.28–8.25 | 0.444 |
| With/without PEA + IOL | 0.560 | ||
| 360S-LOT ab interno alone | 1 | ||
| 360S-LOT ab interno with PEA + IOL | 1.38 | 0.47–3.92 | 0.546 |
Note: P-values are based on Cox proportional HR models.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant.
Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional HR model analysis for 360S-LOT ab interno (criterion B)
| Variable | Criteria B for surgical success
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk ratio | 95% CI | ||
| Age (years) | 0.97 | 0.94–1.00 | 0.060 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma medications | 1.09 | 0.84–1.39 | 0.505 |
| Past history | 0.604 | ||
| None | 1 | ||
| Intraocular surgeries | 0.69 | 0.22–1.83 | 0.467 |
| Selective laser trabeculoplasty | 1.57 | 0.24–6.04 | 0.584 |
| With/without PEA + IOL | 0.636 | ||
| 360S-LOT ab interno alone | 1 | ||
| 360S-LOT ab interno with PEA + IOL | 0.80 | 0.32–1.98 | 0.637 |
Note: P-values are based on Cox proportional HR models.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant.
Intraoperative and postoperative complications following 360S-LOT ab interno
| All patients | 360S-LOT ab interno alone | 360S-LOT ab interno + PEA + IOL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n, patients/eyes | 50/50 | 17/17 | 33/33 | NA |
| Intraoperative blood reflux, n (%) | 50 (100) | 17 (100) | 33 (100) | 1.000 |
| Hyphema, n (%) | 0.072 | |||
| Day 1 | 25 (50) | 12 (71) | 13 (39) | |
| Week 1 | 12 (24) | 7 (41) | 5 (15) | |
| Week 2 | 4 (8) | 2 (12) | 2 (6) | |
| Shallow chamber | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| Wound leaks | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
| IOP spike (>30 mmHg), n (%) | 14 (28) | 4 (24) | 10 (36) | 0.755 |
| Hypotony (IOP <5 mmHg) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
| Infection | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
| Corneal endothelial cell density reduction | 4.9% ± 7.6% | 5.2% ± 5.0% | 4.8% ± 8.6% | 0.859 |
| Anterior chamber washing out, n (%) | 2 (4) | 1 (6) | 1 (3) | 1.000 |
| Subsequent glaucoma surgery, n (%) | 1 (2) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0.340 |
Note: Corneal endothelial cell density reduction is expressed as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: 360S-LOT, 360-degree suture trabeculotomy; PEA + IOL, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant; NA, not applicable; IOP, intraocular pressure.