| Literature DB >> 29844303 |
Yue Xiao1, Feng Wang2, Peide Cui3, Lei Lei4, Juntao Lin5, Mingwei Yi6,7.
Abstract
Micro-surfacing is a widely used pavement preventive maintenance technology used all over the world, due to its advantages of fast construction, low maintenance cost, good waterproofness, and skid-resistance performance. This study evaluated the fine aggregate morphology and surface texture of micro-surfacing by AIMS (aggregate image measurement system), and explored the effect of aggregate morphology on skid-resistance of single-grade micro-surfacing. Sand patch test and British pendulum test were also used to detect skid-resistance for comparison with the image-based method. Wet abrasion test was used to measure skid-resistance durability for feasibility verification of single-grade micro-surfacing. The results show that the effect of Form2D on the skid-resistance of micro-surfacing is much stronger than that of angularity. Combining the feasibility analysis of durability and skid-resistance, 1.18⁻2.36 grade micro-surfacing meets the requirements of durability and skid-resistance at the same time. This study also determined that, compared with British pendulum test, the texture result obtained by sand patch test fits better with results of image method.Entities:
Keywords: aggregate image measurement system; aggregate morphology; micro-surfacing; skid-resistance; surface texture
Year: 2018 PMID: 29844303 PMCID: PMC6025100 DOI: 10.3390/ma11060920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Fine aggregate basic characteristics.
| Properties | Unit | Technical Requirements | Tested Value | Specification Used | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basalt | Limestone | Steel Slag | ||||
| Sand equivalent | % | ≥60 | 68 | 71 | 75 | ASTM D 2419 [ |
| Soundness | % | ≥12 | 15.7 | 15.1 | 13.6 | ASTM C 88 [ |
| Apparent relative density | — | ≥2.5 | 2.978 | 2.708 | 2.872 | ASTM C 128 [ |
| Angularity | s | ≥30 | 42 | 45 | 43 | ASTM C 1252 [ |
Composition of modified emulsified asphalt.
| Materials | Modified Emulsified Asphalt | Asphalt | Water | SBR | Emulsifier | Calcium Chloride | PVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 500 | 300 | 177 | 12 | 10 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Ratio (%) | 100 | 60 | 35.4 | 2.4 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Basic characteristics of modified emulsified asphalt.
| Properties | Unit | Technical Requirements | Tested Value | Specification Used | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sieve residue (1.18) | % | ≤0.1 | 0.04 | ASTM D 244 [ | |
| Charge | — | + | + | ASTM D 244 [ | |
| Rotary viscosity | Pa · s | — | 98 | ASTM D 4402 [ | |
| Evaporated residue content | % | ≥60 | 62.5 | ASTM D 244 [ | |
| Evaporated residue properties | Penetration | 0.1 mm | 40–100 | 57.3 | ASTM D 5 [ |
| Softening point | °C | ≥53 | 54.8 | ASTM D 36 [ | |
| Ductility | cm | ≥20 | 56 | ASTM D 113 [ | |
| Solubility | % | ≥97.5 | 99.3 | ASTM D 2042 [ | |
| Storage stability | 1 day | % | ≤1 | 0.1 | ASTM D 244 [ |
| 5 day | % | ≤5 | 1.2 | ||
Figure 1Gradation curves of MS-2 used in this work.
Composition of 10 types of micro-surfacing.
| Mixture Types | Limestone | Basalt | Steel Slag | MS-2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | ||
| Thickness (mm) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Cement (%) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Water (%) | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 10 |
| Asphalt-aggregate ratio (%) | 7.5 | 7 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 7 | 6.5 | 10 |
Figure 2Instruments (a) for preparing micro-surfacing specimens (b).
Figure 3Aggregate image measurement system (a) and the tested fine aggregates placed on a tray (b).
Figure 4Illustration of Form2D and angularity.
Morphological properties of fine aggregates.
| Properties | Limestone | Basalt | Steel Slag | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | 0.6–1.18 | 1.18–2.36 | 2.36–4.75 | |
| Angularity | 3285 | 3050 | 2923 | 3706 | 3502 | 3327 | 3789 | 4124 | 4546 |
| Form2D | 7.35 | 7.89 | 7.20 | 7.71 | 7.85 | 7.64 | 7.69 | 7.92 | 8.33 |
Figure 5Texture depths of micro-surfacing.
Figure 6BPN of micro-surfacing.
Figure 7Height’s variance of micro-surfacing.
Figure 8WTAT of micro-surfacing.
Figure 9Correlation between aggregate morphology and texture depth.
Figure 10Correlation between aggregate morphology and British pendulum number (BPN).
Figure 11Correlation between aggregate morphology and variances of heights.
Figure 12Correlation between traditional test and digital image method for skid-resistance.