| Literature DB >> 29844190 |
Balázs A Györffy1,2, Judit Kun1, György Török3, Éva Bulyáki1, Zsolt Borhegyi4, Péter Gulyássy5, Viktor Kis6, Péter Szocsics7, András Micsonai1, János Matkó8, László Drahos5, Gábor Juhász2,5,9, Katalin A Kékesi2,10, József Kardos11.
Abstract
C1q, a member of the immune complement cascade, is implicated in the selective pruning of synapses by microglial phagocytosis. C1q-mediated synapse elimination has been shown to occur during brain development, while increased activation and complement-dependent synapse loss is observed in neurodegenerative diseases. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying C1q-controlled synaptic pruning are mostly unknown. This study addresses distortions in the synaptic proteome leading to C1q-tagged synapses. Our data demonstrated the preferential localization of C1q to the presynapse. Proteomic investigation and pathway analysis of C1q-tagged synaptosomes revealed the presence of apoptotic-like processes in C1q-tagged synapses, which was confirmed experimentally with apoptosis markers. Moreover, the induction of synaptic apoptotic-like mechanisms in a model of sensory deprivation-induced synaptic depression led to elevated C1q levels. Our results unveiled that C1q label-based synaptic pruning is triggered by and directly linked to apoptotic-like processes in the synaptic compartment.Entities:
Keywords: apoptotic-like mechanisms; complement C1q; proteomics; synaptic pruning; synaptosome sorting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29844190 PMCID: PMC6004452 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1722613115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.Presence of C1q in the synaptosome fraction. (A) Confocal image of dispersed Syp-positive synaptosomes in SET buffer showing several points of colocalization with C1q (representative image of four independent experiments). (B) Western blot image and (C) bar graphs showing levels of the pre- and postsynaptic markers Syp and Psd95, respectively, and of C1q in pre- (PRE) and postsynaptic (PSD) membrane fractions (n = 6 biologically independent samples). Means ± SEM are shown. **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, two-tailed independent Student’s t test. (Scale bar in A, 5 µm.)
Fig. 2.Sorting of synaptosomes for the synaptic C1q tag. (A) Representative histograms illustrating the fluorescence intensity of C1q-immunolabeled synaptosomes (representative image of at least six independent experiments). The blue histogram in the front represents the negative control sample, labeled solely with the fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibody; the green histogram in the back depicts the fluorescence intensity of synaptosomes labeled with anti-C1qA primary antibody as well. G1 and G2 gates show the populations of untagged and C1q-tagged synaptosomes, respectively. (B) Representative Western blot image demonstrating the level of C1q in 6 million sorted untagged and 6 million sorted C1q-tagged synaptosomes complemented with an image of the corresponding total protein staining (SYPRO Ruby) (representative image of four independent experiments).
Fig. 3.Results of 2D-DIGE experiments. (A) The extent of protein level changes. As generally used in proteomics and adapted in the DeCyder 2D Differential Analysis software, the paired average ratio accounts for the ratio of protein levels in C1q-tagged and untagged samples in the case of increased protein levels and its negative reciprocal value in the case of decreased levels. (B) Functional classification of the proteins exhibiting altered levels. Arrows indicate the direction of level change of the corresponding protein spot. At the Bottom, color codes of the different functional classes are shown.
Fig. 4.The role of apoptotic-like mechanisms in the C1q tagging of synapses. (A–D) According to the gating criteria (Left in A and C; negative controls, solely labeled with the secondary antibody), a large proportion of C1q-tagged synaptosomes was also positive for cleaved caspase-3 (casp3) (Right in A and Left in B) and annexin V (A5) (Right in C and Left in D); the untagged synaptosomes were mostly negative for these apoptotic markers (Right in A and Right in B; Right in C and Right in D) as uncovered using flow cytometry. (E) Triple immunostaining of sagittal brain sections of mice (Upper) confirmed the presence of cleaved caspase-3 in C1q-tagged synapses in the molecular layer of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. On stimulated emission depletion (STED)/confocal combined microscopy images, circles indicate examples of colocalization between C1q (yellow) and the presynaptic and apoptotic markers synaptophysin (cyan) and cleaved caspase-3 (magenta), respectively. Moreover, the abundant colocalization of these three proteins was further confirmed on human brain sections (prepared from the temporal cortex) using the HyVolution 2 pseudosuperresolution confocal microscopy technique (Lower). Means ± SEM are shown; n = 4 mice per apoptotic marker. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001, two-tailed Student’s t test of paired samples. (Scale bar, 0.5 µm.)
Fig. 5.Sensory deprivation elevates synaptic C1q and cleaved caspase-3 levels in the affected brain region. (A) Schematic illustration of the connection between the whiskers and the primary somatosensory barrel cortex via the brainstem and the thalamus. In this experimental model, the whiskers on the right-hand side were removed, while the flow of sensory information from the left-hand side remained undisturbed. Molecular alterations between the affected (Left, contralateral) and unaffected (Right, ipsilateral) barrel cortices were compared. (B) Representative Western blot images showing levels of C1q, cleaved caspase-3, synaptophysin (Syp), and the loading control actin in homogenates of synaptosomes prepared from the barrel cortices of the corresponding hemispheres. (C) Synaptic C1q and cleaved caspase-3 levels were significantly elevated in the affected barrel cortex (normalized to Syp), while a decrease in the level of the presynaptic protein Syp (normalized to actin) suggests deterioration of presynaptic structures. Means ± SEM are shown; n = 6 (12 mice, pooled in groups of 2 before subcellular fractionation). Two-tailed Student’s t test of paired samples.