| Literature DB >> 29843704 |
Xi Zhou1, Qiang Zhang2, Wenhao Song3, Dongsheng Zhou4, Yu He5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures remains a challenging task for orthopedists because of malunion, fracture line absorption, and scar formation. Accurate osteotomy, interfragmentary release, and proper adaptation of plates are keys to successful surgery. Prevention of superior gluteal artery (SGA) injury induced by cleaning of the osteotylus and reduction of the sciatic notch is also important. Therefore, sufficient preoperative planning is essential. However, traditional planning methods do not readily provide direct visual and tactile feedback to surgeons. Rapid prototyping (RP) models have provided new opportunities in the preoperative planning of delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures. We hypothesized that a three-dimensional (3D) skeleton-arterial model would improve both preoperative planning in the management of fractures and arteries and intraoperative assistance during delayed reconstruction of complex acetabular fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Acetabular fractures; Delayed reconstruction; Preoperative plan; Rapid prototyping technique; Skeleton-arterial model
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29843704 PMCID: PMC5975535 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-018-0362-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.102
The detailed characteristics of patients
| Case | Age/gender | Classification | Associated Injuries | Days following injury (day) | Surgical approach | Surgical time (min) | Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | Matta’s method | d’Aubigné–Postel score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40–49/1 | Both columns | Chest and Craniocerebral injuries | 67 | Pararectus and Kocher–langenbeck approach | 420 | 2300 | Imperfect | Good |
| 2 | 30–39/1 | Both columns | Chest injuries | 45 | Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach | 285 | 1200 | Anatomic | Excellent |
| 3 | 20–29/1 | Transverse and posterior wall | Abdominal injuries, closed internal degloving injury | 42 | Kocher–langenbeck approach | 125 | 600 | Imperfect | Excellent |
| 4 | 30–39/1 | T shape | Craniocerebral and abdominal injuries | 36 | Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach | 160 | 1000 | Anatomic | Excellent |
| 5 | 40–49/1 | Both columns | Chest injuries | 64 | Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach | 310 | 1500 | Imperfect | Good |
| 6 | 30–39/2 | Both columns | Abdominal injuries | 54 | Ilio-inguinal and Kocher–langenbeck approach | 210 | 1900 | Imperfect | Good |
| 7 | 40–49/1 | Both columns | Craniocerebral and chest injuries | 29 | Ilio-inguinal approach | 150 | 800 | Anatomic | Excellent |
| 8 | 40–49/1 | Both columns | Craniocerebral injuries | 32 | Pararectus approach | 135 | 700 | Anatomic | Excellent |
Fig. 1A patient (age between 40 and 50) sustained a fracture of his left acetabulum after a fall. Due to thoracic and head trauma, the surgery was performed 67 days later when the patient was in stable general condition. a Preoperative anteroposterior radiographs and (b) computed tomography scans of the pelvis were performed. Ruptured and rotated fragments of the sciatic notch were suspected to be causing injury to the superior gluteal artery. c To obtain a clear diagnosis, the patient was examined with computed tomography angiography. d No obvious arterial damage was found on computed tomography angiography; however, geometric information regarding fractures and arteries cannot be obtained from two-dimensional images
Fig. 2The two-dimensional images and three-dimensional reconstruction data were presented on the user interface of Mimics v15 software
Fig. 3The details of the fractures were shown in the three-dimensional skeleton-arterial model. a, b The fracture characteristics and skeleton-arterial spatial relationships could be evaluated through different angles. The morphological observation, classification, and surgical approach were developed. c, d The superior gluteal artery was surrounded by several fracture fragments, and the sciatic notch was ruptured and rotated. Reduction of the sciatic notch was the key point in the surgical procedure (yellow star). However, simultaneous reduction of the sciatic notch and protection of the superior gluteal artery was not possible. We could not find a way to protect this artery in the preoperative plan; therefore, the need for ligation was determined intraoperatively. The free fragments were connected to the pelvis with a connecting rod to avoid changes in the spatial position (yellow arrow)
Fig. 4Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures was performed in the model. a, b Preoperative planning of the reduction sequence and scenario was performed, and (c, d) the implant placements were determined. The fracture of the iliac wing was not fixed because it was an old fracture with callus formation and stable fracture fragments
Fig. 5The models were applied to identify the operative landmarks and spatial relationships between the fracture fragments and arteries on the operating table
Fig. 6The indirect reduction technique and fixation were used with a pre-contoured construction plate during the operation
System of Merle d’Aubigné–Postel
| Pain | Score | Ability to walk | Score | Mobility | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No pain | 6 | Normal | 6 | Flexion of > 90°; abduction to 30° | 6 |
| Pain is mild and inconstant; normal activity | 5 | Without cane but with slight limp | 5 | Flexion between 80 and 90°; abduction of ≥15° | 5 |
| Pain is mild when walking; it disappears with rest | 4 | A long time with cane; short time without cane and with limp | 4 | Flexion between 60 and 80°; patient can reach his foot | 4 |
| Pain is tolerable with limited activity | 3 | With one cane, < 1 h; very difficult without a cane | 3 | Flexion between 40 and 60° | 3 |
| Pain is severe when walking; prevents any activity | 2 | Only with canes | 2 | Flexion under 40° | 2 |
| Pain is severe even at night | 1 | Only with crutches | 1 | No movement; pain or slight deformity | 1 |
| Pain is intense and permanent | 0 | None | 0 | Ankylosis with bad position of the hip | 0 |
The clinical grade was based on a modification of the system of Merle d’Aubigné–Postel and was determined by adding the points: excellent = 18, good = 15 to 17, fair = 13 or 14, and poor = < 13
Summary of preoperative and intraoperative management
| Case | Fixation | Superior gluteal artery | Manufacturing Time (h/model) | Cost (dollar/model) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planned | Actual Operation | Planned | Actual Operation | |||
| 1 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Ligate | Identical | 42 | 37 |
| A 4-hole plate with 3 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 4-hole plate with 2 screws | ||||||
| A 11-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| A 11-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| (Posterior) | (Posterior) | |||||
| A 8-hole plate with 4 screws | A 8-hole plate with 4 screws | |||||
| A 6-hole plate with 3 screws | A 6-hole plate with 3 screws | |||||
| A 5-hole plate with 4 screws | A 5-hole plate with 4 screws | |||||
| 1 screw | ||||||
| 2 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Reserve | Identical | 52 | 45 |
| A 6-hole plate with 4 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 14-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| 1 screw | ||||||
| (Posterior) | (Posterior) | |||||
| A 4-hole plate with 3 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 7-hole plate with 3 screws | ||||||
| 3 | (Posterior) | (Posterior) | Reserve | Identical | 43 | 37 |
| A 6-hole plate with 5 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 8-hole plate with 5 screws | ||||||
| 2 screws | ||||||
| 4 | (anterior) | (anterior) | ||||
| A 12-hole plate with 7 screws | Identical | |||||
| (Posterior) | (Posterior) | |||||
| A 8-hole plate with 5 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 6-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| 5 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Reserve | Identical | 45 | 40 |
| A 15-hole plate with 7 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 4-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| 1 screw | ||||||
| (Posterior) | (Posterior) | |||||
| A 6-hole plate with 4 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 8-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| 1 screw | ||||||
| 6 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Reserve | Identical | 42 | 37 |
| A 15-hole plate with 8 screws | Identical | |||||
| (Posterior) | (Posterior) | |||||
| A 6-hole plate with 4 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 8-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
| 7 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Reserve | Identical | 46 | 40 |
| A 12-hole plate with 6 screws | A 12-hole plate with 6 screws | |||||
| A 4-hole plate with 3 screws | A 4-hole plate with 3 screws | |||||
| A 4-hole plate with 4 screws | A 3-hole plate with 3 screws | |||||
| A 5-hole plate with 4 screws | A 5-hole plate with 4 screws | |||||
| 8 | (anterior) | (anterior) | Reserve | Identical | 50 | 45 |
| A 12-hole plate with 7 screws | Identical | |||||
| A 9-hole plate with 4 screws | ||||||
Fig. 7The pre-contoured plates selected for the models had a customized shape that perfectly matched the reconstructed acetabulum. The anterior (a) and posterior (b) implants were placed without difficulty, and no adjustments were required. However, there was a slight difference between the actual fixation management and the preoperative plan. One fragment was unreliably fixed by the plates, so a screw was unexpectedly required to enhance the fixation (yellow arrow)
Fig. 8a The anteroposterior radiographs, b computed tomography scan, and (c and d) three-dimensional reconstruction of the postoperative pelvis were performed. The accuracy of reduction was imperfect. The orientation and length of all screws were suitable, and no articular penetration occurred