Li Cheng1,2, Botao Tan3, Ying Yin3, Sanrong Wang3, Lang Jia3, Gerry Warner4, Gongwei Jia3, Wei Jiang3. 1. 1 Department of Respiratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 2. 2 Department of Health Management Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 3. 3 Department of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 4. 4 Department of Rehabilitation, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short- and long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central databases along with hand search of relevant papers were performed on 15 March 2018. REVIEW METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials of pulmonary rehabilitation in IPF patients. The outcomes were exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Two authors independently extracted data, assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan and STATA software. RESULTS: We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials (142 participants). At short-term follow-up, pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhanced 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD; weighted mean difference (WMD) = 38.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.64-72.12, I2 = 60.7%; P < 0.05), reduced St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)/IPF-specific SGRQ (SGRQ-I) total score (WMD = -8.40, 95% CI = -11.44 to -5.36, I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). At long-term follow-up, pulmonary rehabilitation could not enhance 6-MWD (WMD = 17.02, 95% CI = -26.87 to 60.81, I2 = 36.3%; P = 0.43) or reduce SGRQ/SGRQ-I total score (WMD = -3.45, 95% CI = -8.55 to 1.64, I2 = 38.3%; P = 0.088). CONCLUSION: In patients with IPF, pulmonary rehabilitation showed short-term effects in enhancing exercise capacity and health-related quality of life, while it had no detectable effects at long-term follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short- and long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central databases along with hand search of relevant papers were performed on 15 March 2018. REVIEW METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials of pulmonary rehabilitation in IPF patients. The outcomes were exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Two authors independently extracted data, assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan and STATA software. RESULTS: We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials (142 participants). At short-term follow-up, pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhanced 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD; weighted mean difference (WMD) = 38.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.64-72.12, I2 = 60.7%; P < 0.05), reduced St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)/IPF-specific SGRQ (SGRQ-I) total score (WMD = -8.40, 95% CI = -11.44 to -5.36, I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). At long-term follow-up, pulmonary rehabilitation could not enhance 6-MWD (WMD = 17.02, 95% CI = -26.87 to 60.81, I2 = 36.3%; P = 0.43) or reduce SGRQ/SGRQ-I total score (WMD = -3.45, 95% CI = -8.55 to 1.64, I2 = 38.3%; P = 0.088). CONCLUSION: In patients with IPF, pulmonary rehabilitation showed short-term effects in enhancing exercise capacity and health-related quality of life, while it had no detectable effects at long-term follow-up.
Authors: David Lang; Florentine Moazedi-Fürst; Judith Sautner; Helmut Prosch; Sabin Handzhiev; Klaus Hackner; Ivan Tancevski; Holger Flick; Hubert Koller; Hans Peter Kiener; Christian Prior; Bernd Lamprecht Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 1.704