Literature DB >> 2984128

Characterization of hydroxyl radical-induced damage after sparsely and densely ionizing irradiation.

R Roots, A Chatterjee, P Chang, L Lommel, E A Blakely.   

Abstract

The extent of hydroxyl radical mediated cell inactivation was measured for a variety of particle beams ranging from 8.5 Me V/u neon ions to 570 Me V/u argon ions. In general, the fraction of the total radiosensitivity caused by OH decreases from close to 60 per cent at low ionization density or low linear energy transfer (low LET) to close to 25 per cent at high LET for aerobically irradiated mammalian cells. The extent of OH induced cell lethality can be explained in terms of LET infinity only for low energy or low atomic number particles where fragmentations and complicated track structures do not contaminate the characteristic particle LET. For example, at a calculated LET infinity of 100 ke V/micron, the OH mediated fraction of the total radiation damage is about 25 per cent for low energy carbon but close to 40 per cent for high energy carbon ions. For low energy charged nuclei of approximately the same energy, as the 5.4-13.4 MeV/u He, Li, C and Ne ions in this report, there is a predictable diminution of the OH mediated effect with increasing LET infinity; however, the biological effect cannot be predicted accurately from calculated LET infinity values for high energy particle irradiation, nor indeed from a variety of low energy charged particles of quite different energies (incident velocities). This illustrates the unsuitability of using LET as a unifying parameter, except under specific circumstances. As more is learned about the energy deposition for energized charged particles in terms of track structure (core and penumbra), it may be possible to characterize the radiobiological data with a better physical parameter than LET infinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2984128     DOI: 10.1080/09553008514550231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med        ISSN: 0020-7616


  9 in total

1.  LNT RIP: It is time to bury the linear no threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  Christopher L Hansen; Rittu Hingorani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Radioprotective efficacy of dieckol against gamma radiation-induced cellular damage in hepatocyte cells.

Authors:  Velayutham Sadeeshkumar; Arul Duraikannu; Thiyagarajan Aishwarya; Prithi Jayaram; Samuthrapandian Ravichandran; Raghunathan Ganeshamurthy
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Effects of radiation quality on interactions between oxidative stress, protein and DNA damage in Deinococcus radiodurans.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Protection by DMSO against cell death caused by intracellularly localized iodine-125, iodine-131 and polonium-210.

Authors:  A Bishayee; D V Rao; L G Bouchet; W E Bolch; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by charged particles for Future Vaccine Production Applications: A Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Payman Rafiepour; Sedigheh Sina; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.776

6.  Radioprotection against lethal damage caused by chronic irradiation with radionuclides in vitro.

Authors:  R W Howell; S M Goddu; A Bishayee; D V Rao
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  New approaches to radiation protection.

Authors:  Eliot M Rosen; Regina Day; Vijay K Singh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Mitochondrial stress controls the radiosensitivity of the oxygen effect: Implications for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Richard B Richardson; Mary-Ellen Harper
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-19

9.  The Lowest Radiation Dose Having Molecular Changes in the Living Body.

Authors:  Noriko Shimura; Shuji Kojima
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.658

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.