Literature DB >> 2983601

Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy.

M J Aminoff, D S Goodin, N M Barbaro, P R Weinstein, M L Rosenblum.   

Abstract

We examined scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerves and to stimulation in the L5 and S1 dermatomes in 19 patients with unilateral radiculopathies involving these segments. For the dermatomal studies at least two trials of 512 responses were recorded from the vertex with reference to both the midfrontal and contralateral parietal electrodes, using an averaging technique. Findings on the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides were compared in each patient. We found that peroneal SSEPs were normal in all patients. Dermatomal SSEPs correctly identified the lesion in 5 patients. In 1 patient dermatomal SSEPs lateralized the lesion correctly but localized it to the adjacent root. In 10 cases dermatomal SSEPs gave misleading information, indicating an abnormality on the asymptomatic side in 1 patient and no abnormality in 9. In the remaining 3 patients, both SSEPs and radiological contrast studies failed to identify any lesion, although the radiculopathy was confirmed by electromyography. These findings raise doubt about the ultimate utility of these evoked potential techniques in the evaluation of patients with suspected radiculopathies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2983601     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410170211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  8 in total

1.  Increases in voltage may produce false-negatives when using transcranial motor evoked potentials to detect an isolated nerve root injury.

Authors:  Russ Lyon; Anthony Gibson; Shane Burch; Jeremy Lieberman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Sensory deficits of a nerve root lesion can be objectively documented by somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by painful infrared laser stimulations: a case study.

Authors:  J Lorenz; H C Hansen; K Kunze; B Bromm
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Evaluation of the dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential in the diagnosis of lumbo-sacral root compression.

Authors:  H A Katifi; E M Sedgwick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbosacral root compression.

Authors:  M J Aminoff; D S Goodin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials of the lumbar and cervical roots. Method and normal values.

Authors:  P H Pop; C T Oepkes; S L Notermans; N M Vlek; D F Stegeman
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1988

6.  A Comparison of Interside Asymmetries of Lower Extremity Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Patients with Unilateral Lumbosacral Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Qing Yue; Tyson Hale; Aaron Knecht
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17

7.  Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis.

Authors:  Zhenxing Zhang; Yi Wang; Tao Luo; Huaguang Qi; Lin Cai; Yang Yuan; Jingfeng Li
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Changes in Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials according to Stimulation Intensity and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Soo-Youn Sohn; Jeong-Hwan Seo; Yong Min; Min-Ho Seo; Jong-Pil Eun; Kyung-Jin Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-05-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.