Literature DB >> 29809267

Real-World Simulation of an Alternative Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening System in Thailand: A Pilot Study.

S Grace Prakalapakorn, Sharon F Freedman, Amy K Hutchinson, Piyada Saehout, Mine Cetinkaya-Rundel, David K Wallace, Kittisak Kulvichit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate an alternative retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening system that identifies infants meriting examination by an ophthalmologist in a middle-income country.
METHODS: The authors hypothesized that grading posterior pole images for the presence of pre-plus or plus disease has high sensitivity to identify infants with type 1 ROP that requires treatment. Part 1 of the study evaluated the feasibility of having a non-ophthalmologist health care worker obtain retinal images of prematurely born infants using a non-contact retinal camera (Pictor; Volk Optical, Inc., Mentor, OH) that were of sufficient quality to grade for pre-plus or plus disease. Part 2 investigated the accuracy of grading these images to identify infants with type 1 ROP. The authors prospectively recruited infants at Chulalongkorn University Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand). On days infants underwent routine ROP screening, a trained health care worker imaged their retinas with Pictor. Two ROP experts graded these serial images from a remote location for image gradability and posterior pole disease.
RESULTS: Fifty-six infants were included. Overall, 69.4% of infant imaging sessions were gradable. Among gradable images, the sensitivity of both graders for identifying an infant with type 1 ROP by grading for the presence of pre-plus or plus disease was 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 1.0) for grader 1 and 1.0 (95% CI: 0.40 to 1.0) for grader 2. The specificity was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.99) for grader 1 and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.88) for grader 2.
CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible for a trained non-ophthalmologist health care worker to obtain retinal images of infants using the Pictor that were of sufficient quality to identify infants with type 1 ROP. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(4):245-253.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29809267      PMCID: PMC6482815          DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20180327-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  3 in total

Review 1.  The current state of retinopathy of prematurity in India, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, Romania, Thailand, and Venezuela.

Authors:  Theodore Bowe; Lily Nyamai; Dupe Ademola-Popoola; Atchara Amphornphruet; Rachelle Anzures; Linda A Cernichiaro-Espinosa; Roseline Duke; Fahir Duran; Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos; Prabhujot Kaur Multani; Cristina E Nitulescu; Tapas Ranjan Padhi; Boontip Tipsuriyaporn; R V Paul Chan; J Peter Campbell; Yoshihiro Yonekawa
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-12

2.  Evaluating a Portable, Noncontact Fundus Camera for Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening by Nonophthalmologist Health Care Workers.

Authors:  S Grace Prakalapakorn; Sharon F Freedman; Amy K Hutchinson; David K Wallace; Sandra S Stinnett; J Wayne Riggins; Keith J Gallaher
Journal:  Ophthalmol Retina       Date:  2018-01-10

3.  Key factors in a rigorous longitudinal image-based assessment of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Tatiana R Rosenblatt; Marco H Ji; Daniel Vail; Cassie A Ludwig; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Malini Veerappan Pasricha; Natalia F Callaway; Jochen Kumm; Darius M Moshfeghi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.