David J Glasscock1, Ole Carstensen2, Vita Ligaya Dalgaard2. 1. Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital West Jutland-University Research Clinic, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark. davgla@rm.dk. 2. Department of Occupational Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Regional Hospital West Jutland-University Research Clinic, Gl. Landevej 61, 7400, Herning, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing work-related stress indicate that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is more effective than other interventions. However, definitions of study populations are often unclear and there is a lack of interventions targeting both the individual and the workplace. The aim of this study was to determine whether a stress management intervention combining individual CBT and a workplace focus is superior to no treatment in the reduction of perceived stress and stress symptoms and time to lasting return to work (RTW) in a clinical sample. METHODS:Patients with work-related stress reactions or adjustment disorders were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 57, 84.2% female) or a control group (n = 80, 83.8% female). Subjects were followed via questionnaires and register data. The intervention contained individual CBT and the offer of a workplace meeting. We examined intervention effects by analysing group differences in score changes on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30). We also tested if intervention led to faster lasting RTW. RESULTS:Mean baseline values of PSS were 24.79 in the intervention group and 23.26 in the control group while the corresponding values for GHQ were 21.3 and 20.27, respectively. There was a significant effect of time. 10 months after baseline, both groups reported less perceived stress and improved mental health. 4 months after baseline, we found significant treatment effects for both perceived stress and mental health. The difference in mean change in PSS after 4 months was - 3.09 (- 5.47, - 0.72), while for GHQ it was - 3.91 (- 7.15, - 0.68). There were no group differences in RTW. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to faster reductions in perceived stress and stress symptoms amongst patients with work-related stress reactions and adjustment disorders. 6 months after the intervention ended there were no longer differences between the groups.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions aimed at reducing work-related stress indicate that cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is more effective than other interventions. However, definitions of study populations are often unclear and there is a lack of interventions targeting both the individual and the workplace. The aim of this study was to determine whether a stress management intervention combining individual CBT and a workplace focus is superior to no treatment in the reduction of perceived stress and stress symptoms and time to lasting return to work (RTW) in a clinical sample. METHODS:Patients with work-related stress reactions or adjustment disorders were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 57, 84.2% female) or a control group (n = 80, 83.8% female). Subjects were followed via questionnaires and register data. The intervention contained individual CBT and the offer of a workplace meeting. We examined intervention effects by analysing group differences in score changes on the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30). We also tested if intervention led to faster lasting RTW. RESULTS: Mean baseline values of PSS were 24.79 in the intervention group and 23.26 in the control group while the corresponding values for GHQ were 21.3 and 20.27, respectively. There was a significant effect of time. 10 months after baseline, both groups reported less perceived stress and improved mental health. 4 months after baseline, we found significant treatment effects for both perceived stress and mental health. The difference in mean change in PSS after 4 months was - 3.09 (- 5.47, - 0.72), while for GHQ it was - 3.91 (- 7.15, - 0.68). There were no group differences in RTW. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention led to faster reductions in perceived stress and stress symptoms amongst patients with work-related stress reactions and adjustment disorders. 6 months after the intervention ended there were no longer differences between the groups.
Authors: Ligaya Dalgaard; Anita Eskildsen; Ole Carstensen; Morten Vejs Willert; Johan Hviid Andersen; David J Glasscock Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Vita Ligaya Dalgaard; Kirstin Aschbacher; Johan Hviid Andersen; David John Glasscock; Morten Vejs Willert; Ole Carstensen; Karin Biering Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2017-06-26 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Carl Strömberg; Emmanuel Aboagye; Jan Hagberg; Gunnar Bergström; Malin Lohela-Karlsson Journal: Value Health Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Petra C Koopmans; Ute Bültmann; Corné A M Roelen; Rob Hoedeman; Jac J L van der Klink; Johan W Groothoff Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Marit Knapstad; Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit Sæther; Gunnel Hensing; Otto Robert Frans Smith Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anthony Venning; Tassia K Oswald; Jeremy Stevenson; Nicci Tepper; Leva Azadi; Sharon Lawn; Paula Redpath Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295